A Note on Dual System Population Size Estimator

Open access

Abstract

Several countries are currently investigating the possibility of replacing the costly population census with a Population Data set derived from administrative sources, in combination with a purposely designed Population Coverage Survey. We formulate the assumptions of the dual system estimator in this context, and contrast them to the situation involving a census and a Census Coverage Survey.

Di Cecco, D., M. Di Zio, D. Filipponi, and I. Rocchetti. 2018. “Population Size Estimation Using Multiple Incomplete Lists with Overcoverage.” Journal of Official Statistics 34: 557–572. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/JOS-2018-0026.

Ding, Y. and S.E. Fienberg. 1994. “Dual System Estimation of Census Undercount in the Presence of Matching Error.” Survey Methodology 20: 149–158.

Di Consiglio, L. and T. Tuoto. 2015. “Coverage Evaluation on Probabilistically Linked Data.” Journal of Official Statistics 31: 415–429. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/JOS-2015-0025.

Nirel, R. and H. Glickman. 2009. “Sample Surveys and Censuses.” In Sample Surveys: Design, Methods and Applications, Vol 29A, edited by D. Pfeffermann and C.R. Rao: 539–565.

ONS-M8. 2013. Beyond 2011: Producing Population Estimates Using Administrative Data: In Theory. Avaiable at: https://www.ons.gov.uk/census/censustransformationprogramme/beyond2011censustransformationprogramme/reportsandpublications.

Wolter, K. 1986. “Some Coverage Error Models for Census Data.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 81: 338–346. Doi: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2289222.

Zhang, L.-C. 2015. “On Modelling Register Coverage Errors.” Journal of Official Statistics 31: 381–396. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/JOS-2015-0023.

Zhang, L.-C. and J. Dunne. 2017. “Trimmed Dual System Estimation.” In Capture Recapture Methods for the Social and Medical Sciences, edited by D. Böhning, J. Bunge, and P.v.d. Heijden: 239–259. Chapman and Hall/CRC.

Journal of Official Statistics

The Journal of Statistics Sweden

Journal Information


IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 0.662
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.113

CiteScore 2017: 0.74

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 1.158
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.860

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 143 143 143
PDF Downloads 154 154 154