Improving the Efficiency of the Center for Medical Biochemistry, Clinical Center NiŠ, by Applying Lean Six Sigma Methodology

Open access


Laboratories that are part of clinical centers are faced with the inevitability that their efficiency must be on a high level. Most of the biochemical laboratories are automated, but they are still underperforming. The best approach to increase the efficiency or to improve the processes today is the Lean Six Sigma methodology. This methodology extracts many benefits from automated processes. A lean process in the laboratory focuses on the time cycle to obtain results and reduce costs, or both components at the same time. Six Sigma methodology provides that the processes take place in the laboratory without delays and defects. The process that takes place at the Center for Medical Bio - chemistry (CMB) can be divided into two parts: the first part takes place in the receiving infirmary (pre-analytics) and the second part takes place at the offices of the CMB from the receipt of samples (analytics) to obtained results. The paper observes both processes, identifies critical areas where they come to a halt, defines access and reviews the results obtained using the Lean Six Sigma methodology. By applying Lean tools, the places that do not add value and those that significantly increase the cycle time were identified. This paper presents the results obtained without going into detail about the application of these Lean tools.

1. Kruse-Jarres JD. Labormedizin 2000 - Versuch einer Prognose. Lab Med 1994; 18: 213.

2. Felder RA, Graves S, Mifflin T. Reading the future. The increased relevance of laboratory medicine in the next century. MLO Med Lab Obs 1999; 31: 20-6.

3. Arthur J. Lean simplified: The Power Laws of Speed. Denver: LifeStar, 2006: 24 pp.

4. Jimmeerson C, Weber D, Sobek DK II. Reducing waste and errors: piloting lean principles at Intermountain Healthcare. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2005; 5: 249-57.

5. Plebani M. Pre-analytical errors and patient safety. J Med Biochem 2012; 31: 265-70.

6. Serteser M, Coskun A, Inal TC, Unsal I. How ISO-15189 laboratory accreditation assures patient safety? J Med Biochem 2012; 31: 271-80.

7. Liker JK. The Toyota Way. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2004.

8. Shankar R. Process Improvement Using Six Sigma. A DMAIC Guide, ASQ Quality Press, 2009.

9. Kubiak TM, Benbow DW. The Certified Six Sigma Black Belt, Handbook, Second Edition. ASQ Quality Press, 2009.

10. George ML. Lean Six Sigma for Service. McGraw - Hill, New York, 2003.

11. Mladenović S, Milosavljević P. Put ka Lean Six Sigma preduzeću. International Journal »Total Quality Manage ment & Excellence« 2010; 38, No. 3: 71-8.

12. Halwachs-Baumann G. Concepts for Lean Laboratory organization. J Med Biochem 2010; 29: 330-8.

13. Villa D. Automation, Lean, Six Sigma Synergies for improving laboratory efficiency. J Med Biochem 2010; 29: 339-48.

14. Stoiljković V, Milosavljević P, Ranđelović S. Six Sigma Con - cept within Banking System. African Journal of Business Management 2010; 4: 1480-93.

15. Stoiljković V, Trajković J, Stoiljković B. Lean Six Sigma Sample Analysis Process in a Microbiology Laboratory. Journal of Medical Biochemistry 2011; 30: 346-53.

16. Masaaki I. Kaizen: The key to Japan’s competitive success. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill: 1986.

17. Stoiljković V, Stoiljković P, Stoiljković B. Implementation of Lean Six Sigma concept in manufacturing and service organizations. Total Quality Management & Excellence 2009; 37: 499-503.

Journal of Medical Biochemistry

The Journal of Society of Medical Biochemists of Serbia

Journal Information

IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 1.378
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.704

CiteScore 2017: 1.05

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.307
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.532

Cited By


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 120 117 8
PDF Downloads 79 75 6