Automation, Lean, Six Sigma: Synergies for Improving Laboratory Efficiency

Open access

Automation, Lean, Six Sigma: Synergies for Improving Laboratory Efficiency

The Pathology Services worldwide, surrounded by products are today requesting solutions. The approach aims towards the brain-to-brain cycle between caregivers and laboratory professionals. Despite budgets limited to 2-3% of total healthcare expenses, Laboratories are providing information for > 70% of medical actions. »Perianalytics« is becoming the focus; understanding information and sample flow in the whole journey and processes. Process analysis is the main component to understand and shape the best combination of components in designing a truly cost-effective Laboratory solution. Methodologies like Lean (or Toyota Production System) and Six Sigma have started recently to be adopted also in healthcare and in the Laboratory environment. Those techniques showed already successful implementations in healthcare, after their development in other sectors. Their tools are addressing the definition of »value«, »waste«, »flow« as key drivers to improve performances. The synergy among the methods allows decision makers to identify the degree of automation really necessary in their laboratory, with streamlined processes. The different platforms made available by industries, for in vitro diagnostic testing, could become not cost-effective or efficient without a careful assessment of needs, pathways and value-related variables. Total laboratory automation or stand-alone islands for systems can be identified and chosen after process mapping and recommendations deployed with Lean and Six Sigma techniques. This article highlights some key concepts of Lean and their fit in laboratory organization, as methodologies to be implemented before selecting and adopting automated systems.

Liker JK. The Toyota Way. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2004.

Jimmeerson C, Weber D, Sobek DK II. Reducing waste and errors: piloting lean principles at Intermountain Healthcare. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2005; 5: 249-57.

Spear SJ. Fixing healthcare from the inside today. Harvard Bus Rev 2005; 83: 78-91.

Weber DO. Toyota-style management drives Virginia Mason. Physician Exec January-February 2006; 32: 12-17.

Pearsoon TJ, Zaleski S, Frerichs J. Improving preanalytic processes using the principles of lean production (Toyota Production System). Am J Clin Pathol 2006; 125: 16-25.

Graban M, Padgett S. Lean laboratories: competing with methods from Toyota. Lab Med 2008; 39: 6450-648.

Novis DA, Konstantakos G. Reducing errors in the practices of pathology and laboratory medicine. Am J Clin Pathol 2006; 126 (suppl 1): S30-S35.

Jason A. Coons, Techsolve, Beginning the Lean improvement journey in the Clinical Laboratory, white paper 2007.

Nelson L, others. Mayo Clinic, Lean principles in the Laboratory, white paper 2008.

Plebani M, Piva E. Medical errors: Pre-analytical issue in patient safety. Journal of Medical Biochemistry 2010; 29: 310-4.

Halwachs-Baumann. Concepts for Lean laboratory organization. Journal of Medical Biochemistry 2010; 29: 330-8.

Joseph TP. Design of a Lean work-cell. 2006 MLO, 24-32.

Journal of Medical Biochemistry

The Journal of Society of Medical Biochemists of Serbia

Journal Information

IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 1.378
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.704

CiteScore 2017: 1.05

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.307
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.532

Cited By


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 492 457 22
PDF Downloads 268 253 15