From Research to Clinical Application Multi-Parameter Testing: Marker Panels for the Early Detection of Complex Diseases

Open access

From Research to Clinical Application Multi-Parameter Testing: Marker Panels for the Early Detection of Complex Diseases

Multi Parameter Analysis can open novel diagnostic opportunities for the early diagnosis and screening of multimodal diseases like cancer. Single proteins have so far failed to describe such complex diseases. Being able to screen with a set of analytes is one promising way to overcome the present limitations. Various marker identification tools including proteomics approaches have been successfully applied to identify new screening markers for early detection of colorectal cancer (CRC). CRC is one of the most incident cancers worldwide and early detection is clearly a key factor in reducing mortality from CRC. Several screening methods are recommended, including colonoscopy, fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) and fecal DNA analysis. Of these annual stool testing with the guaiac based FOBT is most often applied, in spite of limitations such as low sensitivity and dietary influences. Though proce dures with improved performance eg. immunolo gical FOBT are available, a screening assay for CRC in serum that could easily be integrated in any health check-up would be highly welcome. A positive result of such a test would trigger a follow-up colonoscopy for an exact diagnosis. In this review we will cover aspects of marker identification strategies and describe a well structured marker validation process that is based on clinically characterized sample materials. Finally the value of analytical multi-parameter platforms enabling the combination of multi markers in routine diagnostics settings is outlined. An appropriate multi-parameter immunochemistry platform concept, currently developed under the working name »IMPACT« will be introduced.

Schmidt A, Kellermann J, Lottspeich F. A novel strategy for quantitative proteomics using isotope-coded protein labels. Proteomics 2005; 5: 4-15.

Haab BB, Geierstanger BH, Michailidis G, Vitzthum F, Forrester S, Okon R, Saviranta P, Brinker A, Sorette M, Perlee L, Suresh S, Drwal G, Adkins JN, Omenn GS. Immunoassay and antibody microarray analysis of the HUPO Plasma Proteome Project reference specimens: systematic variation between sample types and calibration of mass spectrometry data. Proteomics 2005; 5: 3278-91.

Wild N, Karl J, Grunert VP, Schmitt RI, Garczarek U, Krause F, Hasler F, Van Riel PLCM, Bayer PM, Thun M, Mattey DLM, Sharif M, Zolg W. Diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis: multivariate analysis of biomarkers. Biomarker 2008; 13 (1): 88-105.

Globocan. Cancer incidence, mortality and prevalence worldwide. 2000;

Mandel JS, Bond JH, Church TR, Snover DC, Bradley GM, Schuman LM, Ederer F. Reducing mortality from colorectal cancer by screening for fecal occult blood. Minnesota Colon Cancer Control Study. N Engl J Med 1993; 328: 1365-71.

Karl J, Wild N, Tacke M, Andres H, Garczarek U, Rollinger W, Zolg W. Improved Diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer Using a Combination of Fecal Occult Blood and Novel Fecal Protein Markers. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology 2008; 6: 1122-8.

Morikawa T, Kato J, Yamaji Y, et al. A comparison of the immunochemical fecal occult blood test and total colonoscopy in the asymptomatic population. Gastroenterology 2005; 129: 422-8.

Zolg WJ, Langen H. How industry is approaching the search for New Diagnostic Markers and Biomarkers. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics 2004; 3.4: 345-54.

Wingren C, Borrebaeck CA. Antibody microarrays: current status and key technological advances. OMICS 2006; 10: 411-27.

Nielsen UB, Geierstanger BH. Multiplexed sandwich assays in microarray format. J Immunol Methods 2004; 290: 107-20.

Saviranta P, Okon R, Brinker A, Warashina M, Eppinger J, Geierstanger BH. Evaluating sandwich immunoassays in microarray format in terms of the ambient analyte regime. Clin Chem 2004; 50: 1907-20.

Claudon A, Vergnaud P, Valverde C, Mayr A, Klause U, Garnero P. New Automated Multiplex Assay for Bone Turnover Markers in Osteoporosis. Clin Chem 2008; 54: 1554-63.

Journal of Medical Biochemistry

The Journal of Society of Medical Biochemists of Serbia

Journal Information

IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 1.378
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.704

CiteScore 2017: 1.05

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.307
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.532


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 120 108 7
PDF Downloads 42 40 3