Testing of IQ™ 200 Automated Urine Analyzer Analytical Performances in Comparison with Manual Techniques

Open access

Testing of IQ™ 200 Automated Urine Analyzer Analytical Performances in Comparison with Manual Techniques

Automation is necessary in laboratory systems. It enables reduction of time required for sample analysis, as well as standardization of methods. However, automation of urine control in laboratories is much less common than in hematological analyses. Not long ago, the necessary automated systems for urine analysis have also been developed. The objective of this study is a comparison of the IQ™ 200 automated system for urine analyzing with standardized manual urine analyzing techniques. Comparative analysis of 300 samples was performed by the IQ™ 200 system and by the standardized methods of manual microscopy and chemical urine analysis. The results acquired point to very high compatibility between urine analyses by manual techniques and by the automated system IQ™ 200, and in some analyses IQ™ 200 showed higher sensitivity. It can be concluded, with the aim of standardization and shortening of time required for urine analysis, that utilization of automated urine analyzing systems is recommendable, especially in institutions with a large number of daily analyses. This is also supported by the fact that operation procedure on automated systems is much more simple in comparison to manual techniques.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Lalić N Ilić M. Klinički značaj analize urina: atlas sedimenta urina. Beograd: Društvo medicinskih biohemičara Srbije i Crne Gore 2005: 5 pp.

  • Kouri TT Gant VA Fogazzi GB. Towards European urinanalysis guidelines: introduction of a project under European Confederation of Laboratory Medicine. Clin Chim Acta 2000; 297: 305-11.

  • Diendoerfer FH Gangwer JR Laird CW Ringold RR. The ≫Yellow IRIS≪ urinalysis workstation: the first commercial application of ≫automated intelligent microscopy≪. Clin Chem 1985; 31: 1491-9.

  • Keijzer de MH Brandts RW. Flow cytometry and urine laboratory: Field evaluation of the Sysmex UF-1000. Sysmex J Int 1997; 7: 117-22.

  • Hyodo T Kumano K Haga M Sakai T. Detection of glo merular and non-glomerular red blood cells by automated urinary sediment analyzer. Nippon Jinzo Gakai Shi 1995; 37: 35-43.

  • Sikirica M Bobetić-Vranić T. Analitička procjena automatskog mikroskopskog analizatora IRIS IQ 200 u kvalitativnoj analizi mokraće. Biochem Med 2004; 3-4: 83-90.

  • Bland JM Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Biochim Clin 1987; 11: 399-404.

  • Aslan D Sandberg S. Simple statistics in diagnostic tests. Journal of Medical Biochemistry 2006; 26: 309-13.

  • European Confederation of Laboratory Medicine. European urinanalysis guidelines: Summary. Scand J Clin Invest 2000; 60: suppl 231: 1-96.

  • Lamchiagdase P Preechaborisutkul K Lomsomboon P Srisuchart P Tantiniti P Khan-u-Ra N et al. Urine sediment examination: A comparison between the manual method and the IQ200 automated urine microscopy analyzer. Clin Chim Acta 2005; 358: 167-74.

  • Wah D Wises P Butch A. Analytic performance of the IQ200 automated urine microscopy analyzer and comparison with manual counts using Fuchs-Rosenthal cell chambers. Am J Clin Pathol 2005; 123: 290-6.

Journal information
Impact Factor

IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 2,000
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1,075

CiteScore 2018: 1.47

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.523
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.581

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 202 134 6
PDF Downloads 87 67 3