The Bases of Postmodernism in Harold Pinter’s play “The Homecoming”

Open access


The modern world, in which we live, is regarded as the period of postmodernism. In this period it is hard to perceive the reality in a right way. So are Harold Pinter’s plays. Mostly they are somewhere between reality and absurdity. Based on his writings, he is considered to be, one of the first postmodernist authors. The simplicity of the dialogues makes the feeling that the play is easy to understand, but after reading/watching all the relationships between the characters you feel a bit confused. Nothing is real, and exactly this is the reality of their world, not to be real. And not only the relationships but the characters themselves do not know who they are in reality and it is hard for them to identify their own personality. As it has been already mentioned above, in Pinter’s plays, we can easily find the elements of postmodernism. In the given papers this idea will be expressed depending on the play “The Homecoming”, where Pinter presents us so-called “family”, the group of people, and shows us their emptiness from the family relationships. Even relationships between father and sons, and wife and husband are not real. All this are presented with the very simple language and this is also the essential characteristic of the postmodern world, also the difficulty of understanding each other, and almost meaningless words. Pinter uses other forms of communication such as pauses and silences, in a manner typical of postmodernism. There should be also noted that “the homecoming” the title itself, makes the reader/audience confused, the expectation about perceiving the title at the beginning does not coincide the perception of it in the ending part. The aim of this paper is to highlight the key elements of postmodernism in Harold Pinter’s play “The Homecoming” and to show us once again, that Pinter’s works are really important in our postmodern world.

Billington, M. (2017). An Introduction to The Homecoming. Discovering Literature: 20th Century. Available at:

Burkman, K. H. (1971). The Dramatic World of Harold Pinter: Its Bases in Ritual. Ohio State University Press.

Carner, K. (2012). I Laughed Until I Cried: The Tragicomedy of Harold Pinter’s “The Homecoming”. Clemson University. Tiger Prints. Available at:

Coe, R. M. (1975). Logic, Paradox, and Pinter’s “Homecoming”. The Johns Hopkins University Press.

Cohen, F. M. (2011). Deconstructing Derrida: Review of “Structure, Sign and Discourse in the Human Sciences”. CyberSeminar: The Continental Origins of Postmodernism (1999). Available at:

Derrida, J. (1993). Structure, sign, and play in the discourse of the human sciences. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Free, J. W. (1969). Treatment of character in Harold Pinter’s “The Homecoming”. South Atlantic Modern Language Association.

Kluckhohn, C. & Murray, H. (1948). Personality: in Nature, Society and Culture. New York: Alfred A Knopf. Inc.

Lahr, J. (2007). Demolition Man: Harold Pinter and “The Homecoming”. The New Yorker. Available at:

Patterson, M. (2007). Oxford guide to play analysis. Oxford University Press.

Pinter, H. (1965). The Homecoming. New York: Grove Press, Inc.

Pinter, H. (2005). Art, Truth & Politics. Nobel Lecture, December 7. The Nobel Foundation. Available at:

Prentice, P. (1980). Ruth: Pinter’s The Homecoming Revisited. Twentieth Century Literature, 26(4), 458-478.

Quigley, A. E. (1975). The Pinter Problem. Princeton University Press.

Raby, P. (2009). The Cambridge Companion to Harold Pinter. Cambridge University Press.

Warner, John M. (1970). The Epistemological Quest in Pinter’s “The Homecoming”. Contemporary Literature. University of Wisconsin Press.

Journal Information


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 122 122 32
PDF Downloads 57 57 26