Relationship Between Texture Sensory Profiles and Optical Properties Measured by Time-Resolved Reflectance Spectroscopy During Post-Storage Shelf Life of ‘Braeburn’ Apples

Open access


‘Braeburn’ apples from three harvests after 6-month storage in controlled atmosphere were measured at 670 nm by time-resolved reflectance spectroscopy (TRS), ranked on decreasing μa670 (increasing maturity), classified as less (LeM), medium and more mature (MoM), randomised into three batches per harvest and analysed after 1, 8 and 14 days of shelf life. LeM and MoM apples were measured in the 630-900 nm range by TRS, and analysed for sensory profile (firm, crispy, juicy, mealy) and pulp mechanical characteristics (firmness, stiffness, energy-to-rupture). All data were processed by Principal Component Analysis (PCA). According to sensory intensity scores, fruits were either divided into five classes (very low – VL; low – L; medium – M; high – H; very high – VH) separately for every attribute, or clustered into four groups, each one representing a specific sensory profile. The absorption spectra showed a maximum at 670 nm (chlorophyll-a) and μa670 was higher in the VH class for firm, crispy and juicy and in the VL and L classes for mealy. The scattering spectra had a decreasing trend with the wavelength increase, and μs’ values were lower in the VH class for firm and crispy, and higher in the VH class for mealy and in the VL ones for juicy. PCA underlined that μs’ values were negatively related to firmness and μa670, and that μa690, μa730, μa830, μa850 and μa900 were opposed to mealiness. PC scores differed among the four sensory profiles and increased from VL to VH classes for firmness, crispiness and juiciness and from VH to VL classes for mealiness.

Bianchi G., Eccher Zerbini P., Rizzolo A. 2009. Short-term training and assessment for performance of a sensory descriptive panel for the olfactometric analysis of aroma extracts. J. Sens. Stud. 24: 149–165. DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-459X.2008.00200.x.

Chen L., Opara U.L. 2013. Texture measurement approaches in fresh and processed foods. A review. Food Res. Int. 51: 823-835. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2013.01.046.

Cubeddu R., D’Andrea C., Pifferi A., Taroni P., Torri–celli A., Valentini G. et al. 2001. Time-resolved reflectance spectroscopy applied to the non-de–structive monitoring of the internal optical proper–ties in apples. Appl. Spectrosc. 55: 1368-1374.

Huang M., Zhu Q., Wang B., Lu R. 2012. Analysis of hyperspectral scattering images using locally linear embedding algorithm for apple mealiness classification. Comput. Electron. Agric. 89: 175–181. DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2012.09.003.

Martelli F., Del Bianco S., Ismaelli A., Zaccanti G. 2009. Light propagation through biological tissue and other diffusive media: theory, solutions and soft–ware. SPIE, Washington, USA.

Mehinagic E., Royer G., Bertrand D., Symoneaux R., Laurens F., Jourjon F. 2003. Relationship between sensory analysis, penetrometry and visible-NIR spectroscopy of apple belonging to different cultivars. Food Qual. Prefer. 14: 473-484. DOI: 10.1016/S0950-3293(03)00012-0.

Mehinagic E., Royer G., Symoneaux R., Bertrand D., Jourjon F. 2004. Prediction of the sensory quality of apples by physical measurements. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 34: 257-269. DOI: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2004.05.017.

Rizzolo A., Vanoli M., Spinelli L., Torricelli A. 2010. Sensory characteristics, quality and opti–cal properties measured by time-resolved re–flectance spectroscopy in stored apples. Post-harvest Biol. Technol. 58: 1-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2010.05.003.

Saeys W., Velazco-Roa M.A., Thennadil S.N., Ra–mon H., Nicolai B.M. 2008. Optical properties of apple skin and flesh in the wavelength range from 350 to 2200 nm. Appl. Opt. 47: 908-919. DOI: 10.1364/AO.47.000908.

Szczesniak A.S. 2002. Texture is a sensory property. Food Qual. Prefer. 13: 215-225. DOI: 10.1016/S0950-3293(01)00039-8.

Torricelli A., Spinelli L., Contini D., Vanoli M., Rizzolo A., Eccher Zerbini P. 2008. Time-resolved reflec–tance spectroscopy for non-destructive assessment of food quality. Sens. Instrum. Food Qual. Saf. 2: 82-89. DOI: 10.1007/s11694-008-9036-2.

Valero C., Barreiro P., Ruiz-Altisent M., Cubeddu R., Pifferi A., Taroni P. et al. 2005. Mealiness detec–tion in apples using time-resolved reflectance spec–troscopy. J. Texture Stud. 36: 439-458. DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-4603.2005.00026.x.

Vanoli M., Zerbini P.E., Rizzolo A., Spinelli L., Torri–celli A. 2010. Time-resolved reflectance spectros-copy for the non-destructive detection of inner attri–butes and defects of fruit. Acta Hort. 877: 1379-1386.

Vanoli M., Rizzolo A., Grassi M., Farina A., Pifferi A., Spinelli L., Torricelli A. 2011. Time-resolved reflec–tance spectroscopy non-destructively reveals struc–tural changes in ‘Pink Lady®’ apples during stor–age. Procedia Food Sci. 1: 81-89. DOI: 10.1016/j.profoo.2011.09.014.

Vanoli M., Rizzolo A., Zanella A., Grassi M., Spinelli L., Cubeddu R., Torricelli A. 2013. Apple texture in relation to optical, physical and sensory properties. Proceedings “InsideFood Sym–posium”, Leuven, Belgium.

Journal Information

CiteScore 2017: 0.53

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.196
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.494

Cited By


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 113 113 7
PDF Downloads 35 35 2