A large single-ring infiltrometer test was performed in order to characterize the saturated hydraulic conductivity below an infiltration basin in the well field of Lyon (France). Two kinds of data are recorded during the experiment: the volume of water infiltrated over time and the extension of the moisture stain around the ring. Then numerical analysis was performed to determine the saturated hydraulic conductivity of the soil by calibration.
Considering an isotropic hydraulic conductivity, the saturated hydraulic conductivity of the alluvial deposits is estimated at 3.8 10−6 m s−1. However, with this assumption, we are not able to represent accurately the extension of the moisture stain around the ring. When anisotropy of hydraulic conductivity is introduced, experimental data and simulation results are in good agreement, both for the volume of water infiltrated over time and the extension of the moisture stain. The vertical saturated hydraulic conductivity in the anisotropic configuration is 4.75 times smaller than in the isotropic configuration (8.0 10−7 m s−1), and the horizontal saturated hydraulic conductivity is 125 times higher than the vertical saturated hydraulic conductivity (1.0 10−4 m s−1).
Al-Muttair, F.F., Al-Turbak, A.S., 1991. Modeling of infiltration from an artificial recharge basin with a decreasing ponded depth. J. King Saud Univ. Eng. Sci., 3, 89–100.
Babaeian, E., Homaee, M., Montzka, C., Vereecken, H., Norouzi, A.A., van Genuchten, M.T., 2016. Soil moisture prediction of bare soil profiles using diffuse spectral reflectance information and vadose zone flow modeling. Remote Sensing of Environnement, 187, 218–229.
Bouwer, H., 2002. Artificial recharge of groundwater: hydrogeology and engineering. Hydrogeology Journal, 10, 121–142. DOI: 10.1007/s10040-001-0182-4.
Dusek, J., Dohnal, M., Vogel, T., 2009. Numerical analysis of ponded infiltration experiment under different experimental conditions. Soil and Water Research, 4, S22–S27.
ISO 14688-2:2004. Reconnaissance et essais géotechniques – Dénomination, description, classification des sols.
Loizeau, S., 2013. Amélioration de la compréhension des fonctionnements hydrodynamiques du champ captant de Crépieux-Charmy. Thèse à l’Université de Grenoble, 220 p.
Mertens, J., Madsen, H., Kristensen, M., Jacques, D., Feyen, J., 2005. Sensitivity of soil parameters in unsaturated zone modeling and the relation between effective, laboratory and in situ estimates. Hydrol. Process., 19, 1611–1633.
Mualem, Y., 1976. A new model for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated porous media. Water Resour. Res., 12, 513–522.
Richards, L.A., 1931. Capillary conduction of liquids through porous mediums. Physics, 1, 318–333.
van Genuchten, M.T., 1980. A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soils Sci. Soc. Am. J., 44, 892–898.
White, I., Sully, M.J., Perroux, K.M., 1992. Measurement of surface-soil hydraulic properties. Disk permeameters, tension infiltrometers and other techniques. In: Topp, C.G., Reynolds, W.D., Green, R.E. (Eds.): Advances in Measurement of Soil Physical Properties: Bringing Theory into Practice. Soil Sci. Soc. Am., Madison, WI.
Willmott, C.J., 1981. On the validation of models. Physical Geography, 2, 184–194.