Comparison of real evapotranspiration measured by weighing lysimeters with simulations based on the Penman formula and a crop growth model

Open access

Abstract

Although the quantification of real evapotranspiration (ETr) is a prerequisite for an appropriate estimation of the water balance, precision and uncertainty of such a quantification are often unknown. In our study, we tested a combined growth and soil water balance model for analysing the temporal dynamics of ETr. Simulated ETr, soil water storage and drainage rates were compared with those measured by 8 grass-covered weighable lysimeters for a 3-year period (January 1, 1996 to December 31, 1998). For the simulations, a soil water balance model based on the Darcy-equation and a physiological-based growth model for grass cover for the calculation of root water uptake were used. Four lysimeters represented undisturbed sandy soil monoliths and the other four were undisturbed silty-clay soil monoliths. The simulated ETr-rates underestimated the higher ETr-rates observed in the summer periods. For some periods in early and late summer, the results were indicative for oasis effects with lysimeter-measured ETr-rates higher than corresponding calculated rates of potential grass reference evapotranspiration. Despite discrepancies between simulated and observed lysimeter drainage, the simulation quality for ETr and soil water storage was sufficient in terms of the Nash-Sutcliffe index, the modelling efficiency index, and the root mean squared error. The use of a physiological-based growth model improved the ETr estimations significantly.

Budagovskyi, A.I., Novák, V., 2011a. Theory of evapotranspiration: 1.Transpiration and its quantitative description. J. Hydrol. Hydromech., 59, 1, 3-23.

Budagovskyi, A.I., Novák, V., 2011b. Theory of evapotranspiration: 2. Soil and intercepted water evaporation. J. Hydrol. Hydromech., 59, 2, 73-84.

Castellvi, F., Snyder, R.L., 2010. A comparison between latent heat fluxes over grass using a weighing lysimeter and surface renewal analysis. J. Hydrol., 381, 213-220.

Crush, J.R., Waller, J.E., Care, D.A., 2005. Root distribution and nitrate interception in eleven temperate forage grasses. Grass Forage Sci., 60, 385-392.

Diestel, H., Zenker, T., Schwartengraeber, R., Schmidt, M., 2007. The Lysimeter Station at Berlin-Dahlem. In: Kersebaum, K.C., Hecker, J.M., Mirschel, W., Wegehenkel, M. (Eds.): Modelling Water and Nutrient Dynamics in Soil Crop Systems. Springer, 259-267.

Durner, W., 2000. SHYPFIT 0.22 Users manual. Research Report 95.1, Department of Hydrology, University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth.

Faharani, H.J., Howell, T.A., Shuttleworth, W.J., Bausch, W.C., 2007. Evapotranspiration; Progress in measurement and modelling in agriculture. T. ASABE, 50(5), 1627-1638.

FAO-Unesco, 1988. Soil Map of the World. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rom., 119 pp.

Ficklin, D.L., Luedelinga, E., Zhang, M., 2010. Sensitivity of groundwater recharge under irrigated agriculture to changes in climate, CO2 concentrations and canopy structure. Agr. Water Manage., 97, 1039-1050.

Herbst, M., Fialkiewicz, W., Chen, T., Pütz, T., Thiery, D., Mouvet, C., Vachaud, G., Vereecken, H., 2005. Intercomparison of flow and transport models applied to vertical drainage in cropped lysimeters. VZJ, 4, 240-254.

Jansson, P.E., Karlberg, L., 2004. Coupled heat and mass transfer model for soil-plant-atmosphere systems. ftp://www.lwr.kth.se/CoupModel/CoupModel.pdf. Royal Institute of Technology, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stockholm.

Jiang, J., Zhang, Y., Wegehenkel, M., Yu, Q., Xia, J., 2008. Estimation of soil water contents and evapotranspiration from irrigated cropland on the North China Plain. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sc., 171, 751-761.

Koitzsch, R., Günther, R., 1990. Simulation model for the calculation of continuous time series of evapotranspiration and soil moisture of agricultural fields. Arch. Acker Pfl. Boden., 24, 717-725. (In German.)

Kroes, J.G., van Dam, J.C. (Eds.), 2003. Reference Manual SWAP version 3.0.4. Wageningen, Alterra, Green World Research, Alterra-Report, 773, Wageningen, The Netherlands, 211 pp.

Legates, D.R., McCabe, G.J., 1999. Evaluating the use of “goodness of fit” measures in hydrologic and hydroclimatic model evaluation. Water Resources Research, 35, 233-241.

Loos, C., Gayler, S., Priesack, S., 2007. Assessment of water balance simulations for large scale weighing lysimeters. J. Hydrol., 335(3-4), 259-270.

Luo, Y., Sophocleous, M., 2010. Seasonal groundwater contribution to crop-water use assessed with lysimeter observations and model simulations. J. Hydrol., 389, 325-335.

Moriasi, D.N., Arnold, J.G., van Liew, M.W., Bingner, R.L., Harmel, R.D., Veith, T.L., 2007. Model Evaluation Guidelines for Systematic Quantification of Accuracy in Watershed Simulations. T. ASABE, 50(3), 885-900.

Mualem,Y., 1976. A new model for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated porous media. Water Resour. Res., 12(3), 513-522.

Nash, J.E., Sutcliffe, L.V. 1970. Riverflow forecasting through conceptual model. J. Hydrol., 273, 282-290.

Press, W.H., Teukolksky, S.A., Vetterling, W.T., Flannery, B.P., 1992. Numerical Recipes in Fortran - The art of scientific computing. Cambridge University Press, 934 pp.

Rana, G., Katerij, N., 2000. Measurement and estimation of actual evapotranspiration in the field under Mediterranean Climate: a review. Eur. J. Agron., 13, 125-153.

Soylu, M.E., Istanbulluoglu, E., Lenters, J.D., Wang, T., 2011. Quantifying the impact of groundwater depth on evapotranspiration in a semi-arid grassland region. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sc., 15, 787-806.

Stenitzer, E., Diestel, H., Zenker, Th., Schwartengräber, R. 2007. Assessment of capillary rise from shallow groundwater by the simulation model SIMWASER using either estimated pedotransfer functions or measured hydraulic properties. Water Resour. Manag., 21, 1567-1584.

Supit, I., Hooijer, A.A., van Diepen, C.A., 1994. System Description of the Wofost 6.0 Crop Simulation Model Implemented in CGMS, Vol. 1: Theory and Algorithms. Joint Research Centre, Commission of the European Communities, EUR 15956 EN, Luxembourg, 146 pp.

Ten Berge, H.F.M, Metselaar, K., Jansen, M.J.W, San Agustin, E.M., Woodhead, T., 1995. The Sawah riceland hydrology model. Water Resour. Res., 31, 2721-2731.

Van Genuchten, M., 1980. A closed form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 44, 892-898.

Van Ittersum, M.K., Leffelaar, P.A., van Keulen, H., Kropff, M.J., Bastiaans, L., Goudriaan, J., 2003. On approaches and applications of the Wageningen crop models. Eur. J. Agron., 18, 201-234.

Wegehenkel, M., 2005. Validation of a soil water balance model using soil water content and pressure head data. Hydrol. Process., 19, 1139-1164.

Wegehenkel, M., Zhang, Y., Zenker, Th., Diestel, H., 2008. The use of lysimeter data for the test of two soil water balance models: A case study. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sc., 171, 762-776.

Willmott, C.J., 1982. Some comments on the evaluation of model performance. B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 64, 1309-1313.

Wohlfahrt, G., Ischick, Chr., Thalinger, B., Hörtnagl, L., Obojes, N., Hammerle, A., 2010. Insights from independent evapotranspiration estimates for closing the energy balance: A grassland case study. VZJ, 9, 1025-1033.

Zenker, T., 2003. Grass reference evapotranspiration and bulk surface resistance. An analysis of the Penman-Monteith approach using lysimeter data obtained from a station located in Berlin. PhD thesis. Technical University of Berlin, pp. 147. (In German with English abstract.) http://edocs.tuberlin.de/diss/2003/zenker_thomas.pdf

Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics

The Journal of Institute of Hydrology SAS Bratislava and Institute of Hydrodynamics CAS Prague

Journal Information


IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 1.714
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.639



CiteScore 2017: 1.91

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.599
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 1.084

Cited By

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 180 179 13
PDF Downloads 62 62 4