Wargame as a combined method of qualitative and quantitative studies

Open access


Wargames are important methods for military planning, education and research. Qualitative models have a long tradition in wargaming for improving and practising the military skills as well as enhancing the military planning based on the experiences and understanding of the experts. Quantitative models are included in simulations and technical studies. Traditionally, the relations between the qualitative and quantitative research have been described as opposites. We shall consider both the approaches, their challenges and possibilities, and their combination for producing more exhaustive wargame and for answering to the criticism of wargame as a mainly qualitative method.

Our main research question is: How to combine quantitative and qualitative approaches and methods to improve quality of results of military wargames? Our main objective is to clarify and illustrate how qualitative and quantitative methods can be combined through the wargame. We shall emphasize the importance of the model selection at the beginning as it limits and guides the form (not the content) of the obtained results. We shall illustrate a combined wargame within different steps and the modelling themes of the game. Our results and findings should be useful for improving and focusing wargames to answer given research questions.

Bruun R. S., Hämäläinen J. S., Lappi E. I. And Lesnowicz Jr E. J. (2010). Data Farming with SANDIS Software Applied to Mortar Vehicle Support for Convoys, Scythe, Proceedings of the International Data Farming Workshop 21: 18-21, Lisbon.

Creswell J. W. (2003). Research Design - Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches, 2003.

Eskola, J. and Suoranta, J. Johdatus laadulliseen tutkimukseen, Vastapaino, 1998.

Flood R. L. and Carson. E. R. (1993). Dealing with Complexity 2nd ed., Plenum Press.

Golafshani N. (2003). Understanding Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research, The Qualitative Report 8(4): 597-607 (http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR8-4/golafshani.pdf.).

Hausken K. and Zhuang J. (2011). Governments’ and Terrorists- Defence and Attack in a T-period Game, Decision Analysis, 8(1): 46-70.

Horne G.E. and Meyer T.E. (2004), Data farming: discovering surprise, Proceedings of the 2004 Winter Simulation Conference, Washington.

Huhtinen A. & Rantapelkonen J. (2001). Taistelut, kokemus ja tieto. Näkemys sotatieteellisestä viestitaktiikasta. Viestikoulu, Loimaa.

Hämäläinen J. S. (2008). Hierarchic parameter structures for military operational analysis, Proceedings of 2nd Nordic Military Analysis Symposium, Stockholm.

Hämäläinen J. S. (2011). Focus group: data farming in support of strategic operational analysis, Scythe: Proceedings of International Data Farming Workshop 23, : 29-32, Riihimäki.

Kasputis S., and Ng H.C. (2000), Composable simulations, Proceedings of the 2000 Winter Simulation Conference, Washington:. 1577-1584.

Kress M. and Szechtman R. (2009). Why Defeating Insurgencies Is Hard: The Effect of Intelligence in Counterinsurgency Operations -A Best-Case Scenario, Operations Research 57(3): 578-585

Lanchester F. W., Aircraft in Warfare: the Dawn of the Fourth Arm (1916)

Lappi E. (2012). Computational methods for tactical simulations, Doctor of Military Science thesis, National Defence University, Department of Tactics and Operations Art, Publications.

Lincoln, Y.S. and Guba, E.G. Fourth Generation Evaluation, SAGE Publications, 1989.

Metteri J. (2006). Kvantitatiiviset tutkimusmenetelmät operaatiotaidon ja taktiikan tutkimuksessa, Maanpuolustuskorkeakoulu, Helsinki.

Miles M. B. and Huberman M. A. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis, 2nd ed., 1994.

Perttula J. (2006). Kokemus ja kokemuksen tutkimus: Fenomenologisen erityistieteen tieteenteoria. p. 115-163 in Perttula, Juha - Latomaa, Timo (toim.) Kokemuksen tutkimus: Merkitys - tulkinta − ymmärtäminen. Helsinki: Dialogia Oy.

Saunders M., Lewis P. and Thornhill A. (2012), Research Methods for Business Student, 6th.

Tashakkori A. and Teddlie C. (1998). Mixed methodology - Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches, Applied Social Method,. 46.

Vargas, L.G. and Whittaker, R.W. (Eds) (1990). Decision making by the analytic hierarchy process: Theory and applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 48(1): 1-173.

Varto, Juha (2005). Laadullisen tutkimuksen metodologia. Elan Vital.

Journal Information


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 132 131 8
PDF Downloads 77 76 7