Why Managers Want to Be Mentors? The Role of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation and the Anticipated Costs of Mentoring for the Propensity to Mentor by Managers in Formal Mentoring in Organizations

Open access

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the research was to find out the correlation between the motivation and costs of internal or external locus of control and the propensity to mentor. Investment of time and personal energy was regarded as factors with an internal locus of control, whereas a lack of mentee’s achievement, problems caused by a mentee, unhealthy or unfriendly relation, and a risk to be replaced by a mentee were regarded as factors with an external locus of control. In the case of internal factors, their locus of control is the mentor him/herself while, in external factors, their locus is outside of the mentor and lies in a situation or an environment.

Methodology: A quantitative cross-sectional study among Polish managers.

Findings: First, the results show that uniquely intrinsic motivation relates to the propensity to mentor, while extrinsic motivation has no importance. Second, before deciding to mentor, managers estimate the costs of mentoring: the higher they are the lower the propensity to mentor. Third, the costs related to the internal locus of control – time and personal energy invested by a mentor in mentoring – are most important when deciding to mentor. The risk of destroying a mentor’s reputation, problems caused by a mentee, unfriendly or unhealthy relationship and a risk to be replaced by a mentee emerged as of little importance. Fourth, previous experience as a mentor or mentee positively influences the propensity to mentor.

Value: The study contributes to existing research, theory, and practice in the field of organizational behavior in the context of mentoring. The findings shed light on decision patterns in managers’ propensity to mentor and thoroughly explore the role of the anticipated cost of mentoring.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Ajzen I. (1991). The theory of planned behaviour. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes50 179–211 https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

  • Ajzen I. (2005). Attitudes personality and behaviour. Berkshire England: McGraw Hill International.

  • Allen T.D. Poteet M.L. Russell J.E.A. and Dobbins G.H. (1997). A field study of factors related to willingness to mentor others. Journal of Vocational Behaviour50 1–2 https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1995.1525

  • Allen T.D. (2004). Protégé selection by mentors: contributing individual and organizational factors Journal of Vocational Behaviour65 469–483 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2003.07.003

  • Batson C.D. and Show L.L. (1991). Encouraging words concerning the evidence for altruism Psychological Inquiry2 159–168 https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0202_17

  • Clutterbuck D. (2016). What about mentee competences 72–83. In: G. Lane and D. Clutterbuck (eds.) The Situational Mentor. London and New York: Routledge.

  • Ehrich L.C. Hansford B. and Tennent L. (2004). Formal mentoring programs in education and other professions: A review of the literature. Educational Administration Quarterly40 518–540 https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X04267118

  • Halatin T.J. and Knotts R.E. (1982). Becoming a mentor: are the risk worth the rewards? Supervisory Management27(20) 27–29.

  • Higgins M.C. and Kram K.E. (2001). Reconceptualising mentoring at work: a developmental network perspective. Academy of Management Review26(2) 264–288 https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.4378023

  • Homans G.C. (1961). Social behaviour: its elementary forms. Oxford Harcourt.

  • Kalbfleisch P.J. (2007). Mentoring enactment theory: describing explaining and predicting communication in mentoring relationship. In: B.R. Ragins and K.E. Kram Handbook in mentoring at work. Sage: Thousand Oaks https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412976619.n20

  • Kram K.E. (1985). Mentoring at work. University Press of America Maryland

  • Kram K.E. and Ragins B.R. (2007). The landscape of mentoring in the 21st century. In: B.R. Ragins and K.E. Kram (2007) (eds.) The handbook of mentoring at work: theory research and practice. Thousand Oaks: Sage https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412976619.n27

  • Lane G. and Clutterbuck D. (eds.) (2016). The Situational Mentor. London and New York: Routledge https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315552873

  • Małota W. (2017). Motivational factors to be a mentor in formal mentoring in organisations. The role of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in propensity to mentor. Journal of Management and Business Administration. Central Europe25(4) 119–143 https://doi.org/10.7206/jmba.ce.2450-7814.210

  • Murray M. (2006). Innovations in performance improvement with mentoring. In: J. Pershing (ed.) Handbook of human performance technology. San Francisco: Pfeiffer.

  • Newby T.J. and Heide A. (1992). The value of mentoring. Performance Improvement Quarterly5(4) 2–15 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1937-8327.1992.tb00562.x

  • Ragins B.R. (1997). Antecedents of diversified mentoring relationships. Journal of Vocational Behavior51 90–109 https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1997.1590

  • Ragins B.R. and Kram K.E. (eds.) (2007) The handbook of mentoring at work: theory research and practice. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

  • Ragins B.R. and Scandura T.A. (1999). Burden or blessing? Expected costs and benefits of being a mentor. Journal of Organisational Behaviour20 493–509 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199907)20:4<493::AID-JOB894>3.0.CO;2-T

  • Ryan R. and Deci E.L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: classic definitions and new directions Contemporary Educational Psychology25 54–67 https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020

  • Standing G. (2014). A Precariat Charter. From Denizens to Citizens. Bloomsbury. Kindle edition https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198728863.003.0005

  • Turban D.B. and Lee F.K. (2007). The role of personality in mentoring relationships: formation dynamics and outcome. In: B.R. Ragins and K.E. Kram (eds.) The handbook of mentoring at work: theory research and practice. Thousand Oaks: Sage California https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412976619.n2

  • Wernimont P.F. and Campbell J.P. (1968). Signs samples and criteria Journal of Applied Psychology52(5) 372–376 https://doi.org/10.1037/h0026244

  • Young A.M. and Perrewe P.L. (2004). The role of expectations in the mentoring exchange: analysis of mentor and protégé expectations in relation to perceived support. Journal of Managerial Issues16(1) 103–125.

  • www.parp.gov.plMentoring w praktyce polskich przedsiębiorstw (2014).

Search
Journal information
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 42 42 21
PDF Downloads 35 35 16