The Principal Threats to the Standing Water Habitats in the Continental Biogeographical Region of Central Europe

Open access

Abstract

This paper discusses threats of standing water habitats of high importance to the European Community in the Continental Biogeographical Region (CBR) of Europe, specifically in Poland, as a reference. The study covers five standing water habitats types distinguished in Natura 2000: 3110, 3130, 3140, 3150, 3160, occurring in 806 Special Areas of Conservation (SACs) in Poland. The most significant threats to standing water habitats in the Continental biogeographical region, result from human-induced changes in hydrological conditions that have modified whole natural systems. Based on multivariate analysis, we found that significant differences in the conservation status of the standing water habitats resulted from a variety of threats, pressures, and activities, among which the most significant are decreased and unstable water resources (3110, 3130, 3140, 3150, 3160), fishing and harvesting aquatic resources (3110, 3130, 3140, 3150, 3160), pollution from use of the catchment (3130, 3140, 3150), improper management and use of the agricultural catchment (3110, 3130, 3140, 3150, 3160) and forest catchment (3110, 3140, 3160), urbanisation, residential and commercial development (3150, 3140), transportation and service corridors (3140> 3160 > 3110, 3150), including parking areas (3140), changes in biocenotic evolution, succession, plant species composition (3110, 3130, 3140, 3150, 3160), succession of invasive species (3130), and more intense touristic exploration (3110, 3130, 3140, 3150, 3160). Only in the case of habitats 3110, 3130, 3140 changes in their conservation status have been associated with climate change.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Agnoletti M. (2014). Rural landscape nature conservation and culture: some notes on research trends and management approaches from a (southern) European perspective. Landsc. Urban Plan. 126 66–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.02.012.

  • Alkemade R. Oorschot M. Miles L. Nellemann C. Bakkenes M. & ten Brink B. (2009). GLOBIO3: a framework to investigate options for reducing global terrestrial biodiversity loss. Ecosystems 12(3) 374–390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-009-9229-5.

  • Amici V. Landi S. Frascaroli F. Rocchini D. Santi E. & Chiarucci A. (2015). Anthropogenic drivers of plant diversity: perspective on land use change in a dynamic cultural landscape. Biodivers. Conserv. 24 3185–3199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-015-0949-x.

  • Amoros C. & Bornette G. (2002). Connectivity and biocomplexity in waterbodies of riverine floodplains. Freshwater Biol. 47 761–776. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2427.2002.00905.x.

  • Babai D. Toth A. Szentirmai I. Biro M. Mate A. Demeter L. Szepligeti M. Varga A. Molnar A. Kun R. & Molnar Z. (2015). Do conservation and agri-environmental regulations effectively support traditional small-scale farming in East-Central European cultural landscapes? Biodivers. Conserv. 24 3305–3327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-015-0971-z.

  • Beilin R. Lindborg R. Stenseke M. Pereira H. M. Llausa`s A. Slatmo E. Cerqueira Y. Navarro L. Rodrigues P. Reichelt N. Munro N. & Queiroz C. (2014). Analysing how drivers of agricultural land abandonment affect biodiversity and cultural landscapes using case studies from Scandinavia Iberia and Oceania. Land Use Policy 36 60–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.07.003.

  • Blackwell M. S. A. & Pilgrim E. S. (2011). Ecosystem services delivered by small-scale wetlands. Hydrolog. Sci. J. 56 1467–1484. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2011.630317.

  • Blicharska M. Orlikowska E. H. Roberge J. M. & Grodzinska-Jurczak M. (2016a). Contribution of social science to large scale biodiversity conservation: A review of research about the Natura 2000 network. Biol. Conserv. 199 110–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.05.007.

  • Blicharska M. Orlikowska E. H. Roberge J. M. & Grodzińska-Jurczak M. (2016b). What can social science tell us about conservation? Review of the Natura 2000 research. Biol. Conserv. 199 110–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.05.007.

  • Bornette G. Amoros C. & Lamouroux N. (1998). Aquatic plant diversity in riverine wetlands: The role of connectivity. Freshwater Biol. 39 267–283. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2427.1998.00273.x.

  • Brooker R. Young J. C. & Watt A. D. (2007). Climate change and biodiversity: impacts and policy development challenges—a European case study. International Journal of Biodiversity Science Ecosystem Services & Management 3 12–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/17451590709618159.

  • Buhk C. Retzer V. Beierkuhnlein C. & Jentsch A. (2007). Predicting plant species richness and vegetation patterns in cultural landscapes using disturbance parameters. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 122 446–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2007.02.010.

  • Catford J.A. Vesk P.A. White M.D. & Wintle B.A. (2011). Hotspots of plant invasion predicted by propagule pressure and ecosystem characteristics. Divers. Distrib. 17 1099–1110. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2011.00794.x.

  • Catford J. A. & Downes B. J. (2010). Using multi-scale species distribution data to infer drivers of biological invasion in riparian wetlands. Divers. Distrib. 16(1) 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2009.00631.x.

  • Chen I. C. Hill J. K. Ohlemuller R. Roy D. B. & Thomas C. D. (2011). Rapid range shifts of species associated with high levels of climate warming. Science 333 1024–1026. http://science.sciencemag.org/content/333/6045/1024.full.

  • Čížková H. Květ J. Comín F. A. Laiho R. Pokorný J. & Pitchart D. (2013). Actual state of European wetlands and their possible future in the context of global climate change. Aquat Sci 75 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-011-0233-4.

  • Čuda J. Rumlerová Z. Brůna J. Skálová H. & Pyšek P. (2017). Floods affect the abundance of invasive Impatiens glandulifera and its spread from river corridors. Divers. Distrib. 23 342–354. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12524.

  • Cvitanovica C McDonaldab J Hobdayac AJ. (2016). Geographic range-scale assessment of species conservation status: A framework linking species and landscape features. J. Environ. Manag. 183(3):864-874 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecon.2018.01.001.

  • Davis M. Naumann S. McFarland K. Graf A. & Evans D. (2014). Literature Review: The Ecological Effectiveness of the Natura 2000 Network. ETC/BD report to the EEA p. 30. Retrieved December 20 2018 from https://bd.eionet.europa.eu/Reports/ETCBDTechnicalWorkingpapers/The_ecological_effectiveness_of_the_Natura_2000_Network.

  • EC (1992). Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the Conservation of Natural Habitats and of Wild Fauna and Flora. Consolidated Version of 13 May 2013. European Commission Brussels. Retrieved December 20 2018 from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:01992L0043-20130701qid=1483906296626from=EN.

  • EC (2009). Directive 2009/147/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009 on the Conservation of Wild Birds (codified Version). Consolidated Version of 13 May 2013. European Commission Brussels. Retrieved December 20 2018 from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:02009L0147-20130701&qid=1484682657634from=EN.

  • EC (2009). White paper - Adapting to climate change: towards a European framework for action. Retrieved December 20 2018 from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/GA/TXT/?uri=celex:52009DC0147.

  • EC (2013). The Economic Benefits of the Natura 2000 Network. Synthesis Report. Publications Office of the European Union Luxembourg p. 76. Retrieved December 20 2018 from http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/natura2000/financing/docs/ENV-12-018_LR_Final1.pdf.

  • EC (2016). Natura 2000. Nature and Biodiversity Newsletter No. 40–July 2016. European Commission Brussels. Retrieved December 20 2018 from http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/info/pubs/docs/nat2000newsl/nat40_en.pdf.

  • EEA (2018). Natura 2000 barometer statistics. Retrieved December 20 2018 from https://www.eea.europa.eu/themes/biodiversity/document-library/natura-2000/natura-2000-network-statistics/natura-2000-barometer-statistics/statistics/barometer-statistics#tab-based-on-data.

  • Eigenbrod F. Hecnar S. J. & Fahrig L. (2009). Quantifying the roadeffect zone: threshold effects of a motorway on anuran populations in Ontario. Ecology and Society14(1) 24. https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/181359

  • Eionet (2018a). Reference Portal for Natura 2000. Retrieved December 20 2018 from https://bd.eionet.europa.eu/activities/Natura_2000/reference_portal.

  • Eionet (2018b). Reporting under Article 17 of the Habitats Directive. Retrieved December 20 2018 from https://bd.eionet.europa.eu/activities/Reporting/Article_17.

  • Ellis E. C. & Ramankutty N. (2008). Putting people in the map: anthropogenic biomes of the world. Front. Ecol. Environ. 6(8) 439–447. https://doi.org/10.1890/070062

  • Estreguil Ch. Caudullo J. & de Rigo D. (2014). A proposal for an integrated modelling framework to characterise habitat pattern. Environ. Modell. Softw. 52 176-191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.10.011

  • Foley J. A. DeFries R. Asner G. P. Barford C. Bonan G. Carpenter S. R. Chapin F. S. Coe M. T. Daily G.C. Gibbs H.K. Helkowski J. H. Holloway T. Howard E.A. Kucharik C. J. Monfreda C. Patz J.A. Prentice I. C. Ramankutty N. & Snyder P. K. (2005). Global consequences of land use. Science 22 570–574. http://doi.org/10.1126/science.1111772

  • Forman R. T. T. & Deblinger R. D. (2000). The ecological road-effect zone of a Massachusetts (USA) suburban highway. Conserv. Biol. 14(1) 36–46. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.99088.x

  • Foxcroft L. C. Rouget M. & Richardson D. M. (2007). Risk assessment of riparian plant invasions into protected areas. Conserv. Biol. 21 412–421. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00673.x

  • Freudenberger L. Hobson P. R. Rupic S. Peer G. Schluck M. Sauermann J. Kreft S. Selva N. & Ibisch P. L. (2013). Spatial road disturbance index (SPROADI) for conservation planning: a novel landscape index demonstrated for the State of Brandenburg Germany. Landscape Ecol. 28 1353–1369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-013-9887-8

  • Garniel A. (2000). Schutzkonzept für gefährdete Wasserpflanzen der Fließgewässer und Gräben Schleswig-Holsteins. Teil C. Gräben. Landesamt für Natur und Umwelt Schleswig-Holstein Kiel.

  • GDEP (2017). General Directorate for Environmental Protection in Poland. Platforma informacyjno-komunikacyjna. Retrieved December 20 2018 from http://pzo.gdos.gov.pl.

  • GDEP (2018). General Directorate for Environmental Protection in Poland. Standard Data Form. Retrieved December 20 2018 from http://natura2000.gdos.gov.pl/wyszukiwarka-n2k.

  • Geertsema W. & Sprangers J. T. C. M. (2002). Plant distribution patterns related to species characteristics and spatial and temporal habitat heterogeneity in a network of ditch banks. Plant Ecology 162(1) 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020336908907

  • GIEP (2018). General Inspection of Environmental Protection in Poland. Monitoring of species and natural habitats. Retrieved December 20 2018 from http://siedliska.gios.gov.pl/pl/.

  • Grzybowski M. (2014). Determinants of the diversity of macrophytes in natural lakes affected by land use in the catchment water chemistry and morphometry lakes. J. Elementol. 19(2) 401-422. http://doi.org/10.5601/jelem.2014.19.1.447

  • Guerrero A. M. Mcallister R. R. & Wilson K. A. (2015). Achieving cross-scale collaboration for large scale conservation initiatives. Conservation Letters 8 107–117. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12112

  • Gustafsson L. Felton A. Felton A.M. Brunet J. Caruso A. Hjältén J. Lindbladh M. Ranius T. Roberge J. M. & Weslien J. (2015). Natural versus national boundaries: the importance of considering biogeographical patterns in forest conservation policy. Conservation Letters 8 50–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12087

  • Harrison P. A. Vandewalle M. Sykes M.T. Berry P. M. Bugter R. de Bello F. Feld C.K. Grandin U. Harrington R. Haslett J.R. Jongman R. H. G. Luck G. W. da Silva P. M. Moora M. Settele J. Sousa J. P. & Zobel M. (2010). Identifying and prioritizing services in European terrestrial and freshwater ecosystems. Biodivers. Conserv. 19 2791–2821. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-010-9789-x

  • Hawbaker T. J. & Radeloff V. C. (2004). Roads and landscape pattern in northern Wisconsin based on a comparison of four road data sources. Conserv. Biol. 18(5) 1233–1244. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00231.x

  • Hefting M. M. van den Heuvel R.N. Verhoeven J. T. A. (2013). Wetlands in agricultural landscapes for nitrogen attenuation and biodiversity enhancement: opportunities and limitations. Ecol. Eng. 56 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.05.001

  • Hein T. Schwarz U. Habersack H. Nichersu J. Preiner S. Willby N. Weigelhofer G. 2016. Current status and restoration options for floodplains along the Danube River. Sci. Total Environ. 543 778–790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.09.073

  • Hermoso V. Clavero M. Villero D. & Brotons L. (2017). EU’s conservation efforts need more strategic investment to meet continental commitments. Conservation Letters 10(2) 231–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12248

  • Herzon I. & Helenius J. (2008). Agricultural drainage ditches their biological importance and functioning. Biol. Conserv. 141 1171–1183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.03.005

  • Hobbs R. J. & Huenneke L. F. (1992). Disturbance Diversity and Invasion: Implications for Conservation. Conserv. Biol. 6 324–337. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1992.06030324.x

  • Houghton R. A. (1994). The worldwide extent of land-use change. BioScience. 44 305–309. https://doi.org/10.2307/1312380

  • Janssen J. A. M. Rodwell J. S. Garcia Criado M. Gubbay S. Haynes T. Nieto A. Sanders N. Landucci F. Loidi J. Ssymank A. Tahvanainen T. Valderrabano M. Acosta A. Aronsson M. Arts G. Attorre F. Bergmeier E. Bijlsma R-J Bioret F. Bita-Nicole C. Biurrun I. Calix M. Capelo J. Carni M. Chytry M. Dengler J. Dimopoulos P. Essl F. Gardjfell H. Gigante D. Giusso del Galdo G. Hajek M. Jansen F. Kapfer J. Mickolajczak A. Molina J.A. Molnár Z. Paternoster D. Piernik A. Poulin B. Renaux B. Schaminee J. H. J. Sumberova K. Toivonen H. Tonteri T. Tsiripidis I. Tzonev R. & Valachovic M. (2016). European Red List of Habitats Part 2: Terrestrial and freshwater habitats. EU p 44. https://doi.org/10.2779/091372

  • Kreft H. & Jetz W. (2010). A framework for delineating biogeographical regions based on species distributions. J. Biogeogr. 37(11) 2029 – 2053. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2010.02375.x

  • Lambdon P. W. Pyšek P. Basnou C. Hejda M. Arianoutsou M. Essl F. Jarošík V. Pergl J. Winter M. Anastasiu P. Andriopoulos P. Bazos I. Brundu G. Celesti-Grapow L. Chassot P. Delipetrou P. Josefsson M. Kark S. Klotz S. Kokkoris Y. Kühn I. Marchante H. Perglová I. Pino J. Vilà M. Zikos A. Roy David & Hulme P. E. (2008). Alien flora of Europe: species diversity temporal trends geographical patterns and research needs. Preslia 80 (2) 101-149.

  • Lambin E. F. Turner B. L. Geist H.J. Agbola S. B. Angelsend A. Brucee J. W. Coomes O. T. Dirzog R. Fischer G. Folke C. George P.S. Homewood K. Imbernon J. Leemans R. Lin X. Moran E. F. Mortimore M. Ramakrishnan P. S. Richardsr J. F. Skane H. Steffen W. Stone G. D. Svedin U. Veldkamp T. A. Vogel C. & Xu J. (2001). The causes of land-use and land-cover change: moving beyond the myths. Global Environ. Chang. 11 261–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-3780(01)00007-3

  • Lepers E. Lambin E. F. Janetos A. C. DeFries R. Achard F. Ramankutty N. & Scholes R. J. (2005). A synthesis of information on rapid land-cover change for the period 1981–2000. BioScience 55 115–124. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055 [0115:ASOIOR]2.0.CO;2

  • Lepš J. & Šmilauer P. (2014). Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data using CANOCO 5. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139627061

  • Lososová Z. Chytrý M. Kühn I. Hájek O. Horáková V. Pyšek P. & Tichý L. (2006). Patterns of plant traits in annual vegetation of man-made habitats in central Europe. Perspect. Plant. Ecol. 8 69–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppees.2006.07.001

  • Maes J. Paracchini M. L. Zulian G. Dunbar M. B. & Alkemade R. (2012). Synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem service supply biodiversity and habitat conservation status in Europe. Biol. Conserv. 155 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2012.06.016

  • Maffi L. & Woodley E. (2010). Biocultural diversity conservation. A Global Sourcebook Earthscan.

  • Manhoudt A. G. E. Visser A. J. & De Snoo G. R. (2007). Management regimes and farming practices enhancing plant species richness on ditch banks. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 119 353–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2006.08.004

  • Martina J. L. Marisa V. Simberloffb D. S. (2016). The need to respect nature and its limits challenges society and conservation science. PNAS 113(22) 6105–6112. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1525003113

  • Meier M. Gerlach R. Schirmel J. & Buhk C. (2017). Plant diversity in a water-meadow landscape: the role of irrigation ditches. Plant Ecol. 218 971–981. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-017-0744-8

  • Middleton B. A. (2012). Rediscovering traditional vegetation management in preserves: trading experiences between cultures and continents. Biol. Conserv. 158 271–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2012.10.003

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment [MEA]. (2005). Ecosystems and Human Wellbeing: Synthesis. Washington (DC) Island Press.

  • Mitsch W. J. Zhang L. Stefanik K. C. Nahlik A. M. Anderson C. J. Bernal B. Hernandez M. & Song K. (2012). Creating wetlands: primary succession water quality changes and self-design over 15 years. BioScience 62 237–250. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2012.62.3.5

  • Mölder A. & Schneider E. (2011). On the beautiful diverse Danube? Danubian floodplain forest vegetation and flora under the influence of river eutrophication. River Res. Appl. 27 881–894. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.1403

  • Molina-Navarro E. Andersen H. E. Nielsen A. Thodsen H. & Trolle D. (2018). Quantifying the combined effects of land use and climate changes onstream flow and nutrient loads: A modelling approach in the Odense Fjord catchment (Denmark). Sci. Total Environ. 621 253-264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.251

  • Morelli T. L. Daly C. Dobrowski S.Z. Dulen D. M. Ebersole J.L. Jackson S. T. Lundquist J. D. Millar C. I. Maher S. P. Monahan W. B. Nydick K. R. Redmond K. T. Sawyer S. C. Stock S. & Beissinger S. R. (2016). Managing Climate Change Refugia for Climate Adaptation. PLoS ONE. 12(1): e0169725.36. Retrieved January 5 2018 from https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169725.

  • Mróz W. (2017). Monitoring of natural habitats. Methodological guide. Introduction. Library of Environmental Monitoring. Inspection of Environmental Protection. Warsaw.

  • Müller I. B. Buhk C. Lange D. Entling M.H. & Schirmel J. (2016). Contrasting effects of irrigation and fertilization on plant diversity in hay meadows. Basic Appl. Ecol. 17 576–585. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2016.04.008

  • Orlikowska E. H. Roberge J. M. Blicharska M. & Mikusiński G. (2016). Gaps in ecological research on the world’s largest internationally coordinated network of protected areas: A review of Natura 2000. Biol. Conserv. 200 216–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.06.015

  • Ortmann-Ajkai A. Csicsek G. Hollós R. Magyaros V. Wágner L. & Lóczy D. (2018). Twenty-Years’ Changes of Wetland Vegetation: Effects of Floodplain-Level Threats. Wetlands 38: 591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-018-1002-0

  • Palang H. Printsmann A. Konkoly-Gyuro E. Urbanc M. Skowronek E. & Woloszyn W. (2006). The forgotten rural landscapes of Central and Eastern Europe. Landscape Ecol. 21 347–357. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.baae.2016.04.008

  • Pallemearts M. Parker C. N. Shukla P. R. & Van Schaik L. G. (2005). The Greenland dialogue on climate change: a policy discussion paper.

  • Parris K. M. & Schneider A. (2009). Impacts of traffic noise and traffic volume on birds of roadside habitats. Ecology and Society 14(1) 29. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-02761-140129

  • Pataki B. Zsuffa I. & Hunyady A. (2013). Vulnerability assessment for supporting the revitalization of river floodplains. Environ. Sci. Policy 34 69–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2012.08.010

  • Percic V. Horvatic J. Has-Schön E. & Bogut I. (2009). Changes in N and P limitation induced by water level fluctuations in Nature Park Kopacki Rit (Croatia): nutrient enrichment bioassay. Aquat. Ecol. 43 27–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10452-007-9156-5

  • Plieninger T. Höchtl F. & Spek T. (2006). Traditional land-use and nature conservation in European rural landscapes. Environ. Sci. Policy 9 317–321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2006.03.001

  • Pluess T. Jarošík V. Pyšek P. Cannon R. Pergl J. Breukers A. & Bacher S. (2012). Which factors affect the success or failure of eradication campaigns against alien species? PLoS One. 7:e48157. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0048157

  • Popescu V. D. Rozylowicz L. Niculae I. M. Cucu A. L. & Hartel T. (2014). Species habitats society: an evaluation of research supporting EU’s Natura 2000 network. PLoS One. 9 13-22. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0113648

  • Pretty J. Adams B. Berkes F. de Athayde S. Dudley N. Hunn E. Maffi L. Milton K. Rapport D. Robbins P. Sterling E. Stolton S. Tsing A. Vintinnerk E. & Pilgrim S. (2009). The intersections of biological diversity and cultural diversity: towards integration. Conservation and Society 7 100–112. http://doi.org/10.4103/0972-4923.58642

  • Rattisab L. Dobrovolskic R. Talebid M. & Loyolae R. (2018). Geographic range-scale assessment of species conservation status: A framework linking species and landscape features. PECON. 16 (2) 97-104. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecon.2018.01.001

  • RDEP 2018. Regional Directorate for Environmental Protection in Poland. Retrieved January 5 2018 from bialystok.rdos.gov.pl; bydgoszcz.rdos.gov.pl; gdansk.rdos.gov.pl; gorzow.rdos.gov.pl; katowice.rdos.gov.pl kielce.rdos.gov.pl krakow.rdos.gov.pl lublin.rdos.gov.pl; lodz.rdos.gov.pl olsztyn.rdos.gov.pl opole.rdos.gov.pl poznan.rdos.gov.pl rzeszow.rdos.gov.pl szczecin.rdos.gov.pl warszawa.rdos.gov.pl wroclaw.rdos.gov.pl.

  • Řepka R. Šebesta J. Maděra P. & Vahalík P. (2015). Comparison of the floodplain forest floristic composition of two riparian corridors: species richness alien species and the effect of water regime changes. Biologia 70(2): 208-217. https://doi.org/10.1515/biolog-2015-0021.

  • Revenga C. Campbell I. Abell R. de Villiers P. & Bryer M. (2005). Prospects for monitoring freshwater ecosystems towards the 2010 targets. Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society B Biological Sciences 360 397-413. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2004.1595.

  • Richardson D. M. Holmes P.M. Esler K. J. Galatowitsch S. M. Stromberg J. C. Kirkman S. P. Pyšek P. & Hobbs R. J. (2007). Riparian vegetation: degradation alien plant invasions and restoration prospects. Divers. Distrib. 13 126–139. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1366-9516.2006.00314.x.

  • Rodrigues A. S. L. Andelman S. J. Bakarr M. I. Boitani L. Brooks T. M. Cowling R. M. Fishpool L. D. C. da Fonseca G. A. B. Gaston K. J. Hoffmann M. Long J. S. Marquet P. A. Pilgrim J. D. Pressey R. L. Schipper J. Sechrest W. Stuart S. N. Underhill L. G. Waller R. W. Watts M. E. J. & Yan X. (2004). Effectiveness of the global protected area network in representing species diversity. Nature 428 640–643. http://doi.org/10.1038/nature02422.

  • Royal Society (2017). Climate Updates: What have we learnt since the IPCC 35 th Assessment Report? https://royalsociety.org/topics-policy/publications/2017/climate-updates/.

  • Sanderson E. W. Jaiteh M. Levy M. A. Redford K. H. Wannebo A. V. & Woolmer G. (2002). The human footprint and the last of the wild. Bioscience. 52(10) 891–904. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0891:THFATL]2.0.CO;2.

  • Sandom C. J. Hughes J. & Macdonald D. W. (2013). Rewilding the Scottish highlands: do wild boar sus scrofa use a suitable foraging strategy to be effective ecosystem engineers? Restor. Ecol. 21 336–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.2012.00903.x.

  • Schindler S. O’Neill F. H. Biró M. Damm C. Gasso V. Kanka R. van der Sluis T. Krug A. Lauwaars S. Sebesvari Z. Pusch M. Baranovsky B. Ehlert T. Neukirchen B. Martin J. R. Euller K. Mauerhofer V. & Wrbka T. (2016). Multifunctional floodplain management and biodiversity effects: a knowledge synthesis for six European countries. Biodivers. Conserv. 25 1349–1382. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-016-1129-3.

  • Schnitzler A. E. Hale B. W. & Alsum E. (2005). Biodiversity of floodplain forests in Europe and eastern North America: a comparative study of the Rhine and Mississipi Valleys. Biodivers. Conserv. 14 97–117. http://http:/doi.org/10.1007/s10531-005-4056-2

  • Selva N. Kreft S. Kati V. Schluck M. Jonsson B. Mihok B. Okarma H. & Ibisch P. L. (2011). Roadless and low-traffic areas as conservation targets in Europe. Environ Manage. 48(5) 865–877. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-011-9751-z.

  • Stępniewska M. Zwierzchowska I. & Mizgajski A. (2018). Capability of the Polish legal system to introduce the ecosystem services approach into environmental management. Ecosystem Services 29 271–281. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.02.025.

  • Strayer D. L. & Dudgeon D. (2010). Freshwater biodiversity conservation: Recent progress and future challenges. J. N. Am Benthol. Soc. 29 344–358. https://doi.org/10.1899/08-171.1.

  • ter Braak C. J. F. & Smilauer P. (1998). Canoco Reference Manual and User’s Guide to Canoco forWindows: Software for Canonical Community Ordination Version 4. New York Microcomputer Power Ithaca.

  • ter Braak C. J. F. & Verdonschot P. F. M. (1995). Canonical correspondence analysis and related multivariate methods in aquatic ecology. Aquat Sci 57 255–289. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00877430.

  • Tockner K. & Stanford J. A. (2002). Riverine floodplains: present state and future trends. Environ Conserv. 29 308–330. http://doi.org/10.1017/S037689290200022X.

  • Toomey A. H. Knight A. T. Barlow J. (2017). Navigating the Space between Research and Implementation in Conservation. Conservation Letters 10(5) 619–625. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12315.

  • UNEP-WCMC IUCN (2016). Protected Planet Report 2016. UNEP-WCMC and IUCN Cambridge UK and Gland Switzerland.

  • Ustaoglu E. & Williams B. (2017). Determinants of Urban Expansion and Agricultural Land Conversion in 25 EU Countries. Environ Manage. 60 717–746. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-017-0908-2.

  • Van Eetvelde V. & Antrop M. (2004). Analyzing structural and functional changes of traditional landscapes—two examples from southern France. Landsc. Urban Plan. 67 79–95. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(03)00030-6.

  • Van Geest G. J. Wolters H. Roozen F. C. J. M. Coops H. Roijackers R. M. M. Buijse A. D. & Scheffer M. (2005). Water-level fluctuations affect macrophyte richness in floodplain lakes. Hydrobiologia 539 239–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-004-4879-y.

  • Van Strien A. J. Van der Burg T. Rip W. T. M. & Strucker R. C. W. (1991). Effects of mechanical ditch management on the vegetation of ditch banks in Dutch peat areas. J Appl Ecol. 28 501–513. http://doi.org/10.2307/2404564.

  • Vardarman J. Berchová-Bímová K. & Pěknicová J. (2018). The role of protected area zoning in invasive plant management. Biodivers. Conserv. 27 1811–1829. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-018-1508-z.

  • Von Der Lippe M. & Kowarik I. (2007). Long-distance dispersal of plants by vehicles as a driver of plant invasions. Conserv. Biol. 21 986–996. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00722.x.

  • Voulvoulis N. Arpon K. D. & Giakoumis T. (2017). The EU Water Framework Directive: From great expectations to problems with implementation. Sci. Total Environ. 575 358-366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.228

  • Ward J. V. & Stanford J. A. (1995). Ecological connectivity in alluvial river ecosystems and its disruption by flow regulation. River Res. Appl. 11 105–119. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrr.3450110109.

  • Wuebbles D. J. Easterling D. R Hayhoe K. Knutson T. Kopp R. E. Kossin J. P. Kunkel K. E. LeGrande A. N. Mears C. Sweet W. V. Taylor P. C. Vose R. S. & Wehner M. F. (2017). Our globally changing climate. Climate Science Special Report: Fourth National Climate Assessment Volume I. In. D. J. Wuebbles D. W. Fahey K. A. Dokken D. J. Hibbard B. C. Stewart & T. K. Maycock (Eds.) U.S. Global Change Research Program (pp. 35-72). USA: Washington DC. http://doi.org/10.7930/J08S4N35.

  • Zorilla-Miras P. Palomo I. Gomes-Baggenthun E. Martin-Lopez B. Lomas P. L. Montes P. (2014). Effects of land-use change on wetland ecosystem services: a case study in the Donana marshes (SWSpain). Landscape Urban Plan. 122 60–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.09.013.

Search
Journal information
Impact Factor
CiteScore 2018: 0.45

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.183
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.233

Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 49 49 15
PDF Downloads 46 46 12