The Role of Carotid Ultrasonography in Patients with High Risk of Atherosclerosis

Open access

Abstract

Atherosclerosis is a systemic disease that most often affects the carotid arteries. Being usually asymptomatic in its early stages, it is diagnosed only in advanced stages, when treatment is more difficult and prognosis is poor. Carotid ultrasound (US) is the most commonly used method for diagnosing carotid artery disease and represents a proper method for screening in patients with cardiovascular (CV) risk factors. This paper shows the methodology and necessity of carotid imaging methods in patients at high risk of developing atherosclerotic lesions. We also review the findings that underline the need of carotid screening in patients with ischemic heart disease or with ischemic arteriopathy, showing that the carotid arteries are like ‘mirrors’ of the arterial system, which need to be assessed in every patient with CV risk factors, regardless of the presence or absence of symptoms.

1. Steg PG, Bhatt DL, Wilson PW, et al. One-year cardiovascular event rates in outpatients with atherothrombosis. JAMA. 2007;291:1197-1206.

2. McGill Jr, Henry C. Risk factors for atherosclerosis. The Thrombotic Process in Atherogenesis. Springer. 1978;104:273-280.

3. Vrselja Z, Brkic H, Mrdenovic S, Radic R, Curic G. Function of circle of Willis. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2014;34:578-584.

4. Willeit J, Stefan K. Prevalence and risk factors of asymptomatic extracranial carotid artery atherosclerosis. A population-based study. Arterioscler Thromb. 1993;13;661-668.

5. Piotr S, Joshua B. Carotid Artery Disease. Circulation. 2006;114:244-247.

6. Walker M, Marler R, Goldstein M, et al. Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. JAMA. 1995;273:1421-1428.

7. Griggs R, Bluth E. Noninvasive risk assessment for stroke: special emphasis on carotid atherosclerosis, sex-related differences, and the development of an effective screening strategy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196:259-264.

8. Kakisis, JD, Avgerinos ED, Antonopoulos CN, et al. The European society of vascular surgery guidelines for carotid intervention: an updated independent assessment and literature review. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2012;44:238-243.

9. Moore WS, Barnett HJ, Beebe HG et al. Guidelines for carotid endarterectomy. A multidisciplinary consensus statement from the Ad Hoc Committee, American Heart Association. Circulation. 1995;91:566-579.

10. Adla T, Adlova R. Multimodality Imaging of Carotid Stenosis. Int J Angiol. 2015;24:179-184.

11. Loizou CP. A review of ultrasound common carotid artery image and video segmentation techniques. Springer. 2014;52:1073-1093.

12. Adla T, Adlova R. Multimodality Imaging of Carotid Stenosis. Int J Angiol. 2015;24:179-184.

13. Serena J, Irimia P, Calleja S, Blanco M, Vivancos J, Ayo-Martín Ó. Cuantificación ultrasonográfica de la estenosis carotídea: recomendaciones de la Sociedad Española de Neurosonología. Neurología. 2013;28:435-442.

14. AbuRahma AF, Wulu Jr JT, Crotty B. Carotid plaque ultrasonic heterogeneity and severity of stenosis. Stroke. 2002;33:1772-1775.

15. Polak JF, Shemanski L, O’Leary DH, et al. Hypoechoic plaque at US of the carotid artery: an independent risk factor for incident stroke in adults aged 65 years or older. Cardiovascular Health Study. Radiology. 1998;208:649-654.

16. Prabhakaran S, Rundek T, Ramas R, et al. Carotid Plaque Surface Irregularity Predicts Ischemic Stroke The Northern Manhattan Study. Stroke. 2006;37:2696-2701.

17. Rothwell PM, Gibson R, Warlow CP. Interrelation between plaque surface morphology and degree of stenosis on carotid angiograms and the risk of ischemic stroke in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis. Stroke. 2000;31:615-621.

18. Brinjikji W, Huston III J, Rabinstein A, et al. Contemporary carotid imaging: from degree of stenosis to plaque vulnerability. J Neurosurg. 2016;124:27-42.

19. Lee W. General principles of carotid Doppler ultrasonography. Ultrasonography. 2014;33:11-17.

20. Sitzer M, Fürst G, Fischer H, et al. Between-method correlation in quantifying internal carotid stenosis. Stroke. 1993;24:1513-1518.

21. Alexandrov A, Brodie DS, McLean A, et al. Correlation of peak systolic velocity and angiographic measurement of carotid stenosis revisited. Stroke. 1997;28:339-342.

22. Grant EG, Benson CB, Moneta GL, et al. Carotid artery stenosis: grayscale and Doppler ultrasound diagnosis – Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound consensus conference. Radiology. 2003;229:340-346.

23. Oates CP, Naylor AR, Hartshorne T, et al. Joint recommendations for reporting carotid ultrasound investigations in the United Kingdom. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2009;37:251-261.

24. Evans NS. Carotid Artery Stenosis. Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine. 2016;24:47-56.

25. Brott TG, Halperin JL, Abbara S, et al. 2011 ASA/ACCF/AHA/AANN/AANS/ACR/ASNR/CNS/SAIP/SCAI/SIR/SNIS/SVM/SVS guideline on the management of patients with extracranial carotid and vertebral artery disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines, and the American Stroke Association, American Association of Neuroscience Nurses, American Association of Neurological Surgeons, American College of Radiology, American Society of Neuroradiology, Congress of Neurological Surgeons, Society of Atherosclerosis Imaging and Prevention, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery, Society for Vascular Medicine, and Society for Vascular Surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57:16-94.

26. Tahmasebpour HR, Buckley AR, Cooperberg PL, Fix CH. Sonographic examination of the carotid arteries. Radiographics. 2005;25:1561-1575.

27. Boontje AH. External carotid artery revascularization: indications, operative techniques and results. J Cardiovasc Surg. 1992;33:315-318.

28. Päivänsalo MJ, Siniluoto TM, Tikkakoski TA, Myllylä V, Suramo IJ. Duplex US of the external carotid artery. Acta Radiologica. 1996;37:41-45.

29. Ricotta A, AbuRahma E, Ascher M, et al. Society for Vascular Surgery. Updated Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines for management of extracranial carotid disease. J Vasc Surg. 2011;54:1-3.

30. Cosottini M, Pingitore A, Puglioli M, et al. Contrast-enhanced three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography of atherosclerotic internal carotid stenosis as the noninvasive imaging modality in revascularization decision making. Stroke. 2003;34:660-664.

31. Randoux B, Marro B, Koskas F, et al. Carotid artery stenosis: prospective comparison of CT, three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR, and conventional angiography. Radiology. 2001;220:179-185.

32. Josephson SA, Bryant SO, Mak HK, et al. Evaluation of carotid stenosis using CT angiography in the initial evaluation of stroke and TIA. Neurology. 2004;63:457-460.

33. Cumming MJ, Morrow IM. Carotid artery stenosis: a prospective comparison of CT angiography and conventional angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994;163:517-522.

34. Mester A, Oltean-Péter B, Rodean I, et al. Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Myocardial Function Following Intracoronary and Intramyocardial Stem Cell Injection. Journal of Interdisciplinary Medicine. 2017;2:112-116.

35. Inzitari D, Eliasziw M, Gates P, et al. The causes and risk of stroke in patients with asymptomatic internal-carotid-artery stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1693-1700.

36. Fox Allan J. How to measure carotid stenosis. Radiology. 1993;186:316-318.

37. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:445-453.

38. European Carotid Surgery Trialists Collaborative Group. MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial: interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70–99%) or with mild (0–29%) carotid stenosis. Lancet. 1991;337:1235-1243.

39. Rothwell PM, Gibson RJ, Slattery J, et al. Prognostic value and reproducibility of measurements of carotid stenosis. A comparison of three methods on 1001 angiograms. European Carotid Surgery Trialists’ Collaborative Group. Stroke. 1994;25:2440-2444.

40. Saba L, Giorgio M. A comparison between NASCET and ECST methods in the study of carotids: evaluation using Multi-Detector-Row CT angiography. Eur J Radiol. 2010;76:42-47.

41. Staikov IN, Arnold M, Mattle H, et al. Comparison of the ECST, CC, and NASCET grading methods and ultrasound for assessing carotid stenosis. J Neurol. 2000;247:681-686.

42. Craven TE, Ryu JE, Espeland MA, et al. Evaluation of the associations between carotid artery atherosclerosis and coronary artery stenosis. A case-control study. Circulation. 1990;82:1230-1242.

43. Salonen JT, Riitta S. Ultrasonographically assessed carotid morphology and the risk of coronary heart disease. Arterioscler Thromb. 1991;11:1245-1249.

44. Jashari F, Ibrahimi P, Nicoll R. Coronary and carotid atherosclerosis: similarities and differences. Atherosclerosis. 2013;227:193-200.

45. Hodis HN, Mack WJ, LaBree L, et al. The role of carotid arterial intima-media thickness in predicting clinical coronary events. Ann Intern Med. 1998;128:262-269.

46. Kablak-Ziembicka A, Tracz W, Przewlocki T, et al. Association of increased carotid intima-media thickness with the extent of coronary artery disease. Heart. 2004;90:1286-1290.

47. Lester SJ, Eleid MF, Khandheria BK, Hurst RT. Carotid Intima-Media Thickness and Coronary Artery Calcium Score as Indications of Subclinical Atherosclerosis. Mayo Clin Proc. 2009;84:229-233.

48. Ikeda N, Kogame N, Iijima R, Nakamura M, Sugi K. Impact of carotid artery ultrasound and ankle-brachial index on prediction of severity of SYNTAX score. Circ J. 2013;77:712-716.

49. Oei HH, Vliegenthart R, Hak AE, et al. The association between coronary calcification assessed by electron beam computed tomography and measures of extracoronary atherosclerosis: the Rotterdam Coronary Calcification Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39:1745-1751.

Journal Information

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 18 18 9
PDF Downloads 15 15 5