Cardiac Magnetic Resonance and Myocardial Viability: Why Is It so Important?

Open access


For a better assessment of ischemic heart diseases, myocardial viability should be quantified. Current studies underline the importance and the evolution of several techniques and methods used in the evaluation of myocardial viability. Taking into account these considerations, the aim of this manuscript was to present the recent points of view regarding myocardial viability and its clinical significance in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathies and left ventricular dysfunction. On the other hand, the manuscript points out the role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), one of the most useful noninvasive imaging techniques, in the assessment of myocardial viability. By comparing the advantages and disadvantages of cardiac MRI, its usefulness can be better appreciated by the clinician. In the following years, it is considered that MRI will be an indispensable imaging tool in the assessment of ischemic heart disease, guiding interventions for revascularization and long-term risk stratification in patients with stable angina or myocardial infarction.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • 1. Florian A Jurcut R Ginghina C Bogaret J. Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Ischemic Heart Disease – A Clinical Review. J Med Life. 2011;4:330-345.

  • 2. Saeed M Van TA Krug R Hetts SW Wilson MW. Cardiac MR imaging: current status and future direction. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2015;5:290-310.

  • 3. Partington SL Kwong RY Dorbala S. Multimodality imaging in the assessment of myocardial viability. Heart Fail Rev. 2011;16:381-395.

  • 4. Bhat A Gan GC Tan TC Hsu C Denniss AR. Myocardial Viability: From Proof of Concept to Clinical Practice. Cardiol Res Pract. 2016;2016:1020818.

  • 5. Kim EK Song YB Chang SA et al. Is cardiac magnetic resonance necessary for prediction of left ventricular remodeling in patients with reperfused ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction? Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017. doi: 10.1007/s10554-017-1206-z. [Epub ahead of print]

  • 6. Richardson WJ Clarke SA Quinn TA Holmes JW. Physiological Implications of Myocardial Scar Structure. Compr Physiol. 2016;5:1877-1909.

  • 7. Mester A Oltean-Péter B Rodean I et al. Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Myocardial Function Following Intracoronary and Intramyocardial Stem Cell Injection. Journal of Interdisciplinary Medicine. 2017;2:112-116.

  • 8. Bax JJ Delgado V. Myocardial viability as integral part of the diagnostic and therapeutic approach to ischemic heart failure. J Nucl Cardiol. 2015;22:229-245.

  • 9. Saeed M Liu H Liang CH Wilson MW. Magnetic resonance imaging for characterizing myocardial diseases. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017. doi: 10.1007/s10554-017-1127-x. [Epub ahead of print]

  • 10. Buckert D Kelle S Buss S et al. Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction and Presence of Myocardial Necrosis Assessed by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Correctly Risk Stratify Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease: A Multi-Center All-Comers Trial. Clin Res Cardiol. 2016;106:219-229.

  • 11. Hassanein AS Khalifa AM Ibrahim el-SH. Cine Viability Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Heart Without Increased Scan Time. Magn Reson Imaging. 2015;34:183-190.

  • 12. Souto ALM Souto RM Teixeira ICR Nacif MS. Myocardial Viability on Cardiac Magnetic Resonance. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2017;108:458-469.

  • 13. Masci PG Bogaert J. Post myocardial infarction of the left ventricle: the course ahead seen by cardiac MRI. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2012;2:113-127.

  • 14. Shabana A El-Menyar A. Myocardial Viability: What We Knew and What Is New. Cardiol Res Pract. 2012;2012:607486.

  • 15. Bordi L Kovacs I Bajka B et al. New Imaging-based Tools for the Assessment of Ventricular Function in Ischemic Heart Diseases. Journal of Interdisciplinary Medicine. 2017;2:31-35.

  • 16. West AM Kramer CM. Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Myocardial Infarction Viability and Cardiomyopathies. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2010;35:176-220.

  • 17. Perrone-Filardi P Bacharach SL Dilsizian V et al. Metabolic evidence of viable myocardium in regions with reduced wall thickness and absent wall thickening in patients with chronic ischemic left ventricular dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;20:161-168.

  • 18. Bove CM DiMaria JM Voros S Conaway MR Kramer CM. Dobutamine response and myocardial infarct transmurality: functional improvement after coronary artery bypass grafting—initial experience. Radiology. 2006;240:835-841.

  • 19. Health Quality Ontario. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the assessment of myocardial viability: an evidence-based analysis. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2010;10:1-45.

  • 20. Arai AE. The cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) approach to assessing myocardial viability. J Nucl Cardiol. 2011;18:1095-1102.

  • 21. Schinkel AF Poldermans D Elhendy A Bax JJ. Assessment of myocardial viability in patients with heart failure. J Nucl Med. 2007;48:1135-1146.

  • 22. Kim RJ Albert TSE Wible JH et al. Performance of delayed-enhancement myocardial resonance imaging with gadoversetamide contrast for the detection and assessment of myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2008;117:629-637.

  • 23. Jimenez JL Crean AM Wintersperger BJ. Late gadolinium enhancement imaging in assessment of myocardial viability: techniques and clinical applications. Radiol Clin North Am. 2015;53:397-411.

  • 24. Ahmed N Carrick D Layland J Oldroyd KG Berry C. The role of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Heart Lung Circ. 2013;22:243-255.

  • 25. Rubenstein JC Lee DC Wu E et al. A comparison of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging peri-infarct border zone quantification strategies for the prediction of ventricular tachyarrhythmia inducibility. Cardiol J. 2013;20:68-77.

  • 26. Ortiz-Perez JT Rodriguez J Meyers SN Lee DC Davidson C Wu E. Correspondence between the 17-segment model and coronary arterial imaging using contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol Img. 2008;1:282-293.

  • 27. Lund GK Stork A Saeed M et al. Acute myocardial infarction: evaluation with first-pass enhancement and delayed enhancement MR imaging compared with 201Tl SPECT imaging. Radiology. 2004;232:49-57.

  • 28. Saeed M Hetts SW Jablonowski R Wilson MW. Magnetic resonance imaging and multi-detector computed tomography assessment of extracellular compartment in ischemic and non-ischemic myocardial pathologies. World J Cardiol. 2014;6:1192-1208.

  • 29. Bodi V Sanchis J Nunez J et al. Prognostic value of a comprehensive cardiac magnetic resonance assessment soon after a first ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol Img. 2009;2:835-842.

  • 30. Wu E Ortiz JT Tejedor P et al. Infarct size by contrast enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance is a stronger predictor of outcomes than left ventricular ejection fraction or end-systolic volume index: prospective cohort study. Heart. 2008;94:730-736.

  • 31. Buckert D Dewes P Walcher T et al. Intermediate-term prognostic value of reversible perfusion deficit diagnosed by adenosine CMR: a prospective follow-up study in a consecutive patient population. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;6:56-63.

  • 32. Zemrak F Petersen SE. Late gadolinium enhancement CMR predicts adverse cardiovascular outcomes and mortality in patients with coronary artery disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2011;54:215-229.

  • 33. Rizzi PB Nacif M Volpe GJ et al. Quantification of myocardial scar assessed by late gadolinium enhancement CMR in the multi-ethnics study of atherosclerosis: comparisons of 7 different methods. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2013;15:O49.

  • 34. Reimer KA Jennings RB. The changing anatomic reference base of evolving myocardial infarction. Underestimation of myocardial collateral blood flow and overestimation of experimental anatomic infarct size due to tissue edema hemorrhage and acute inflammation. Circulation. 1979;60:866-876.

  • 35. Choi CJ Haji-Momenian S DiMaria JM et al. Infarct involution and improved function during healing of acute myocardial infarction: the role of microvascular obstruction. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2004;6:917-925.

  • 36. Wu KC Kim RJ Bleumke DA et al. Quantification and time course of microvascular obstruction by contrast-enhanced echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging following acute myocardial infarction and reperfusion. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;32:1756-1764.

  • 37. Lima JAC Judd RM Bazille A et al. Regional Heterogeneity of Human Myocardial Infarcts Demonstrated by Contrast-Enhanced MRI. Circulation. 1995;92:1117-1125.

  • 38. Rogers WJ Jr Kramer CM Geskin G et al. Early contrast-enhanced MRI predicts late functional recovery after reperfused myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1999;99:744-750.

  • 39. Kramer CM. The prognostic significance of microvascular obstruction after myocardial infarction as defined by cardiac magnetic resonance. Eur Heart J. 2005;26:532-533.

  • 40. Tarantini G Cacciavillani L Corbetti F et al. Duration of ischemia is a major determinant of transmurality and severe microvascular obstruction after primary angioplasty: a study performed with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:1229-1235.

  • 41. Deneke T Muller KM Lemke B et al. Human histopathology of electroanatomic mapping after cooled-tip radiofrequency ablation to treat ventricular tachycardia in remote myocardial infarction. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2005;16:1246-1251.

  • 42. Roes SD Kelle S Kaandorp TA et al. Comparison of myocardial infarct size assessed with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and left ventricular function and volumes to predict mortality in patients with healed myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 2007;100:930-936.

  • 43. Wu KC Zerhouni EA Judd RM et al. Prognostic significance of microvascular obstruction by magnetic resonance imaging in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1998;97:765-772.

  • 44. Friedrich MG Abdel-Aty H Taylor A et al. The salvaged area at risk in reperfused acute myocardial infarction as visualized by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;51:1581-1587.

  • 45. Abdel-Aty H Zagrosek A Schulz-Menger J et al. Delayed enhancement and T2-weighted cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging differentiate acute from chronic myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2004;109:2411-2416.

  • 46. Dall’Armellina E Piechnik SK Ferreira VM et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance by non-contrast T1-mapping allows assessment of severity of injury in acute myocardial infarction. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2012;14:15.

  • 47. Ugander M Oki AJ Hsu LY et al. Extracellular volume imaging by magnetic resonance imaging provides insights into overt and subclinical myocardial pathology. Eur Heart J. 2012;33:1268-1278.

  • 48. West AM Kramer CM. Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Myocardial Infarction Viability and Cardiomyopathies. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2010;35:176-220.

  • 49. Nagel E Lehmkuhl HB Bocksch W et al. Noninvasive diagnosis of ischemia-induced wall motion abnormalities with the use of high dose dobutamine stress MRI: comparison with dobutamine stress echocardiography. Circulation. 1999;99:763-770.

  • 50. Hundley WG Hamilton CA Clarke GD et al. Visualization and functional assessment of proximal and middle left anterior descending coronary stenoses in humans with magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation. 1999;99:3248-3254.

  • 51. Morariu M Bordi L Opincariu D Ratiu M Condrea S Benedek A Benedek T. New Developments in Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Myocardial Diseases – Technical Aspects and Clinical Applications. Journal of Interdisciplinary Medicine. 2017;2:17-21.

  • 52. Barkhausen J Hunold P Jochims M Debatin JF. Imaging of myocardial perfusion with magnetic resonance. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2004;19:750-757.

Journal information
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 320 197 6
PDF Downloads 144 95 4