Managing Organizational Conflicts: A Study among Organizations in Kosovo

Open access

Abstract

Organizations and managers during their organizational activities, not rarely face different conflicts. Managers, depending on their gender, use different ways to resolve these conflicts while this reflects on their subordinates. The purpose of this study is to analyse the most common approaches applied to resolve conflicts in organizations in Kosovo and the impact of gender on the choice of style to handle conflicts. The study employs a quantitative approach whilst convenience sampling method is used for the purpose of selecting respondents. The study is conducted in ten largest companies in Kosovo in which hundred employees and fifty managers were included. A structured questionnaire is used to collect primary data and necessary tests were conducted through SPSS. Results reveal that managers use the integrative style more than other styles during the conflict management process; gender partially affects the choice of the style and the style of conflict management affects the likelihood of managers among employees. The study suggests that the field of conflict management among organizations in Kosovo needs more academic research.

Al-Ajmi, R. (2007). The effect of personal characteristics on conflict management style: A study among public sector employees in Kuwait. Competitive Review: An International Business Journal, 181-192.

Augsburger, D. W. (1992). Conflict Mediation Across Cultures: Pathways and Patterns. Louisville, Kentucky: Westminster John Knox Press.

Baron, R. A. (1989). Personality and organizational conflict: Type A behavior pattern and self-monitoring. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 281–297.

Bauer, T., & Erdogan, B. (2012). Organizational Behavior. FWK Online Book.

Blake, R., & Mouton, J. (1964). The managerial grid. Houston, TX: Gulf.

Borisoff, D., & Victor, A. (1998). Conflict Management: A Communication Skills Approach. Needham Heights: Allyn & Bacon, AViacom Company.

Carter, C. (1999). Conflict mediation at school: the influence of student characteristics. Dissertation Abstract International.

Coser, L. (1957). Social Conflict and the Theory of Social Change.

Coser, L. (1967). Continuities in the study of social conflict. University of Michigan: Free Press.

Deutsch, M. (1949). A Theory of Cooperation and Competition. Human Relations, 129-151.

Deutsch, M. (1973). The Resolution of Conflict: Constructive and Destructive Processes. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.

Field, A. (2005). Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. London: SAGE Publications.

Fleetwood, K. (1987). The Conflict Management Styles and Strategies of Educational Managers. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Delaware, Newark.

George, D. &. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple.. (4th ed.)... Boston.

Green, C. (2012). Examples of Four Types of Conflict. Human Resources.

Hafcrkamp, C. (1991). Orientation to conflict: gender, attributions, resolution strategies, and self-monitoring. Current Psychology, 227-240.

Hignite, M., Margavio, T., & Chin, J. (2002). Assessing the conflict resolution profiles of emerging information systems professionals. Journal of Information Systems Education, 315-324.

Jaffe, D. (2000). Organizational theory: Tension and change. New York: McGraw Hill.

Jargon, J., Karnitschnig, M., & Lublin, J. S. (2008). How Hershey went sour. Wall Street Journa.

Jones, G., & George, J. (2008). Contemporary Management. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies.

K.W, Thomas, G., & Schaubhut, N. (2008). Conflict styles of men and women at six organization levels. International Journal of Conflict Management, 148-166.

Kenrick, D., & Funder, D. (1991). The person-situation debate: Do personality traits really exist? In Personality: Contemporary theory and research (pp. 149-173). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.

Kinicki, A., & Kreitner, R. (2008). Organizational Behavior: Key Concepts, Skills & Best Practices. New York: The McGraw - Hill Companies.

Konovsky, M., Jaster, F., & McDonald, M. (1998). Using parametric statistics to explore the construct validity of the Thomas-Kilmann conflict mode survey. Management Communication Quarterly, 268-291.

Korabik, K., Baril, G., & Watson, C. (1993). Managers’ conflict management styles and leadership effectiveness: the moderating effects of gender. Sex Roles, 405-420.

Krumov, K., Ilieva, S., & Karabeliova, S. (1997). Conflict resolution strategies in transition to market economy. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 65-77.

McKenna, S., & Richardson, J. (1995). Business values, management and conflict handling: issues in contemporary Singapore. Journal of Management Development, 56-70.

Rahim. (2002). Toward a theory of managing organizational conflict. International Journal of Conflict Management, 206-235.

Rahim, M. (1983a). A measure of styles of handling interpersonal conflict. Academy of Management Journal, 368-376.

Rahim, M. (1983b). Rahim organizational conflict inventory-II: Forms A, B, and C. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

Rahim, M., & Bonoma, T. (1979). Managing organizational conflict: A model for diagnosis and intervention. Psychological Reports.

Reysen, S. (2005). Construction of a new scale: The Reysen Likeability Scale. Social Behavior and Personality, 201-208.

Taylor, W. (1991). The logic of global business: An interview with ABB’s Percy Barnevik. Harvard Business Review, 90–105.

Thomas, G., & Schaubhut, N. (2008). Conflict styles of men and women at six organization levels. International Journal of Conflict Management, 148-166.

Thomas, K. (1976). Conflict and conflict management. In Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 889-935). Chicago: Rand-McNally.

Thomas, K., & Kilmann, R. (1974). The Thomas-Kilmann Conflict MODE Instrument. Tuxedo, NY: Xicom. Thomas, K., Thomas, G., & Schaubhut, N. (2008). Conflict styles of men and women at six organization levels. International Journal of Conflict Management, 148-166.

Journal Information

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 103 103 22
PDF Downloads 35 35 12