Subjective Well-Being and Job Types: New Evidence From China

Open access


Research purpose. The job types might be potential determinants of subjective well-being (SWB), which is seldom investigated in the current literature. This article examines this relationship by collecting data from the Chinese Household Income Project in 2013 to explore this relationship.

Approach. In line with existing studies on SWB, we apply the ordered probit model and further estimate the effects of different job types on SWB.

Findings. This article demonstrates that individuals employed by Sino-foreign joint enterprises tend to have the lowest SWB. On the contrary, those employed by the public sector and private enterprises are more likely to acquire higher satisfaction.

Practical implications. To conclude, job types are closely linked with SWB and job types should be incorporated as a crucial factor when further analysing the SWB.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Ahuvia A. C. (2002). Individualism/collectivism and cultures of happiness: A theoretical conjecture on the relationship between consumption culture and subjective well-being at the national level. Journal of Happiness Studies 3(1) 23-36.

  • Antinyan A. (2016). Reference group income and subjective well-being: Empirical evidence from low-income transition economies. Social Indicators Research 127(3) 1333-1348.

  • Cai S. & Park A. (2016). Permanent income and subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 130 298-319.

  • Eggers A. Gaddy C. & Graham C. (2006). Well-being and unemployment in Russia in the 1990s: Can society's suffering be individuals’ solace?. The Journal of Socio-Economics 35(2) 209-242.

  • Fujiwara D. & Campbell R. (2011). Valuation techniques for social cost-benefit analysis: stated preference revealed preference and subjective well-being approaches: a discussion of the current issues. HM Treasury.

  • Fujiwara D. & Lawton R. N. (2016). Happier and more satisfied? Creative occupations and subjective wellbeing in the United Kingdom. Psychosociological Issues in Human Resource Management 4(2) 50.

  • Goerke L. & Pannenberg M. (2015). Direct evidence for income comparisons and subjective well-being across reference groups. Economics Letters 137 95-101.

  • Guven C. & Sørensen B. E. (2012). Subjective well-being: Keeping up with the perception of the Joneses. Social Indicators Research 109(3) 439-469.

  • Headey B. & Wooden M. (2004). The effects of wealth and income on subjective well-being and ill-being. Economic record 80 S24-S33.

  • Hudders L. & Pandelaere M. (2012). The silver lining of materialism: The impact of luxury consumption on subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies 13(3): 411-437.

  • Iyer R. & Muncy J. A. (2009). Purpose and object of anti-consumption. Journal of Business Research 62(2) 160-168.

  • Litchfield J. Reilly B. & Veneziani M. (2012). An analysis of life satisfaction in Albania: A heteroscedastic ordered probit model approach. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 81(3) 731-741.

  • Luttmer E. F. (2005). Neighbors as Negatives: Relative Earnings and Well-Being. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 963-1002.

  • Ye Y. & Lin L. (2015). Examining relations between locus of control loneliness subjective well-being and preference for online social interaction. Psychological reports 116(1) 164-175.

Journal information
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 122 122 39
PDF Downloads 55 55 16