Morphological Features and Plaque Composition in Culprit Atheromatous Plaques of Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes

Open access

Abstract

Background: The independent role of each plaque feature in relation to plaque vulnerability is still the subject of ongoing research. This study aimed to compare the morphologic characteristics of vulnerable atheromatous coronary plaques with the ones of stable, non-vulnerable plaques, and in plaques with different locations in the coronary tree, in order to identify the most relevant imaging-based biomarkers associated with coronary plaque vulnerability.

Material and methods: This was a prospective observational, non-randomized study that included 50 patients with unstable angina who underwent computed tomography angiography for assessment of the entire coronary artery tree followed by complex morphologic analysis of all lesions, divided into two groups: group 1 – 25 patients with vulnerable plaque (VP) and group 2 – 25 age- and gender-matched patients with non-vulnerable plaque (NVP).

Results: Lesions with a stenosis degree >70% were significantly longer than those with a stenosis degree <70% (8.27 ± 2.74 mm vs. 5.56 ± 4.11 mm, p = 0.04). VP presented significantly higher values of plaque thickness (p = 0.0005), plaque burden (p = 0.0004), and higher total plaque volume (p = 0.0005) than NVP. The remodeling index was not significantly different between the groups (p = 0.6), but the eccentricity index was (0.24 ± 0.14 compared to 0.14 ± 0.17, p = 0.023). Linear regression analysis revealed a significant correlation between plaque burden and plaque components in VP (r = 0.76, p <0.0001 for necrotic core; r = 0.62, p = 0.0008 for fibro-fatty tissue; and r = 0.5, p = 0.01 for fibrotic tissue volume). Culprit plaques located in the right coronary artery presented significantly larger plaque burden volumes (91.17 ± 4.88 mm3 vs. 83.35 ± 8.47 mm3, p = 0.04), larger volumes of necrotic core (82.03 ± 47.85 mm3 vs. 45.84 ± 43.72 mm3, p = 0.02) and fibrofatty tissue (53.23 ± 31.92 mm3 vs. 23.76 ± 20.90 mm3, p = 0.02) than the ones situated in the left coronary artery.

Conclusions: VPs from the culprit lesions exhibit a different phenotype than non-vulnerable ones, and vulnerability features are present in a significantly larger extent in VPs from the right coronary artery as compared to those from the left coronary artery.

1. World Health Organisation, Cardiovascular disease (CVDs), 2016. Available from: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs317/en/#.

2. Dubey G, Verma SK, Bahl VK. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST elevation myocardial infarction: Outcomes and determinants of outcomes: A tertiary care center study from North India. Indian Heart J. 2017;69:294-298. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2016.11.322.

3. Choy SY, Mintz GS. What have we learned about plaque rupture in acute coronary syndromes? Curr Cardiol Rep. 2010;12:338-343. doi: 10.1007/s11886-010-0113-x.

4. Finn AV, Nakano M, Narula J, Kolodgie FD, Virmani R. Concept of vulnerable/unstable plaque. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2010;30:1282-1292. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.108.179739.

5. Stone GW, Maehara A, Lansky AJ, et al. A prospective naturalhistory study of coronary atherosclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:226-235. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1002358.

6. Bentzon JF, Otsuka F, Virmani R, Falk E. Mechanisms of plaque formation and rupture. Circ Res. 2014;114:1852-1866. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.114.302721.

7. Stefanadis C, Antoniou CK, Tsiachris D, Pietri P. Coronary Atherosclerotic Vulnerable Plaque: Current Perspectives. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017;6:e005543. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.005543.

8. Benedek T, Gyöngyösi M, Benedek I. Multislice Computed Tomographic Coronary Angiography for Quantitative Assessment of Culprit Lesions in Acute Coronary Syndromes. Can J Cardiol. 2013;29:364-371. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2012.11.004.

9. Giblett JP, Brown AJ, Keevil H, Jaworski C, Hoole SP, West NE. Implantation of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds following acute coronary syndrome is associated with reduced early neointimal growth and strut coverage. EuroIntervention. 2016;12:724-733. doi: 10.4244/EIJV12I6A117.

10. Giannakopoulos TG, Avgerinos ED, Moulakakis KG, et al. Biomarkers for diagnosis of the vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque. Interv Cardiol. 2011;3;223-233.

11. Dalager MG, Bøttcher M, Thygesen J, Andersen G, Bøtker HE. Different Plaque Composition and Progression in Patients with Stable and Unstable Coronary Syndromes Evaluated by Cardiac CT. BioMed Research International. 2015;2015:401357. doi:10.1155/2015/401357.

12. Waxman S, Ishibashi F, Muller JE. Detection and Treatment of Vulnerable Plaques and Vulnerable Patients. Novel Approaches to Prevention of Coronary Events. Circulation. 2006;114:2390-2411. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.540013.

13. Maurovich-Horvat P, Schlett CL, Alkadhi H, et al. The napkin-ring sign indicates advanced atherosclerotic lesions in coronary CT angiography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;5:1243-1252. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.03.019.

14. Kajander OA, Pinilla-Echeverri N, Jolly SS, et al. Culprit plaque morphology in STEMI – an optical coherence tomography study: insights from the TOTAL-OCT substudy. EuroIntervention. 2016;12:716-723. doi: 10.4244/EIJV12I6A116.

15. White SJ, Newby AC, Johnson TW. Endothelial erosion of plaques as a substrate for coronary thrombosis. Thromb Haemost. 2016;115:509-519. doi: 10.1160/TH15-09-0765.

16. Nasu K, Tsuchikane E, Katoh O, et al. Accuracy of in vivo coronary plaque morphology assessment: a validation study of in vivo virtual histology compared with in vitro histopathology. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:2405-2412. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.02.044.

17. Motoyama S, Masayoshi S, Harigaya H, et al. Computed tomographic angiography characteristics of atherosclerotic plaques subsequently resulting in acute coronary syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54:49-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.02.068.

18. Tian J, Ren X, Vergallo R, et al. Distinct morphological features of ruptured culprit plaque for acute coronary events compared to those with silent rupture and thin-cap fibroatheroma: a combined optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:2209-2216. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.01.061.

19. Jang IK. Optical Coherence Tomography or Intravascular Ultrasound? JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2011;4:492-494. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.02.004.

20. Yonetsu T, Lee T, Murai T, et al. Plaque morphologies and the clinical prognosis of acute coronary syndrome caused by lesions with intact fibrous cap diagnosed by optical coherence tomography. Int J Cardiol. 2016;203:766-774. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.11.030

21. Benedek T, Jako B, Benedek I. Plaque quantification by coronary CT and intravascular ultrasound identifies a low CT density core as a marker of plaque instability in acute coronary syndromes. Int Heart J. 2014;55:22-28. doi.org/10.1536/ihj.13-213.

22. Ohayon J, Finet G, Gharib AM, et al. Necrotic core thickness and positive arterial remodeling index: emergent biomechanical factors for evaluating the risk of plaque rupture. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2008;295:H717-H727. doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00005.2008

23. Xie Y, Mintz G, Yang J, et al. Clinical Outcome of Nonculprit Plaque Ruptures in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome in the PROSPECT Study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;7:397-405. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2013.10.010.

24. Benedek I, Bucur O, Benedek T. Intracoronary infusion of mononuclear bone marrow-derived stem cells is associated with a lower plaque burden after four years. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2014;21:217-229. doi.org/10.5551/jat.19745.

25. Maejima N, Hibi K, Saka K, et al. Morphological features of non-culprit plaques on optical coherence tomography and integrated backscatter intravascular ultrasound in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;16:190-197. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeu173.

26. Kato M, Dote K, Sasaki S, et al. Presentations of acute coronary syndrome related to coronary lesion morphologies as assessed by intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography. Int J Cardiol. 2013;165:506-511. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.09.032.

27. Okubo M, Kawasaki M, Ishihara Y, et al. Tissue characterization of coronary plaques: comparison of integrated backscatter intravascular ultrasound with virtual histology intravascular ultrasound. Circ J. 2008;72:1631-1639. doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-07-0936.

28. Burke AP, Kolodgie FD, Farb A, Weber D, Virmani R. Morphological predictors of arterial remodeling in coronary atherosclerosis. Circulation. 2002;105:297-303. doi: https://doi.org/10.1161/hc0302.102610

29. Pasterkamp G, Schoneveld AH, van der Wal AC, et al. Relation of arterial geometry to luminal narrowing and histologic markers for plaque vulnerability: the remodeling paradox. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;32:655-662. doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(98)00304-0.

30. Tian J, Ren X, Vergallo R, et al. Distinct Morphological Features of Ruptured Culprit Plaque for Acute Coronary Events Compared to Those With Silent Rupture and Thin-Cap Fibroatheroma. A Combined Optical Coherence Tomography and Intravascular Ultrasound Study. JACC. 2014;63:2209-2216. doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.01.061.

31. Lee Y, Kim E, Kim BK, Shin JH. A case of successful reperfusion through a combination of intracoronary thrombolysis and aspiration thrombectomy in ST segment elevation myocardial infarction associated with an ectatic coronary artery. BMC Cardiovascular Disorders. 2017;17:94. doi.org/10.1186/s12872-017-0527-0.

32. Carey BC, Blankenship JC. A Sequential Approach to the Management of a Massive Intracoronary Thrombus in ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Case Report. 2007;58:106-111. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0003319706295511.

33. Kang SJ, Nakano M, Virmani R, et al. OCT Findings in Patients With Recanalization of Organized Thrombi in Coronary Arteries. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging. 2012;5:725-732. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.03.012.

34. Benedek T, Bucur O, Pascanu I, Benedek I. Analysis of coronary plaque morphology by 64-multislice computed tomography coronary angiography and calcium scoring in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Acta Endocrinologica. 2011;7:59-68. doi: https://doi.org/10.4183/aeb.2011.59.

Journal Information

Cited By

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 198 198 19
PDF Downloads 146 146 19