Assessment of work ability is an important aspect of occupational medical services, the main goal being to maintain employees’ health, well-being and efficiency. The aim of the study was to evaluate and compare the work ability of workers employed by two machinery factories. We used the Work Ability Index (WAI) questionnaire to assess 165 workers of an iron casting factory A and 166 workers in a press-forging plant B. The data obtained were evaluated and compared based on gender, age, length of service and occupation. Mean WAI for the two factories were almost identical (43.3±4.9 for Factory A and 43.3±4.6 for Factory B), both indicating good overall work ability. The lowest mean WAI (37.7) was registered for the crane operators from Factory B, and the highest (47.2) - for the molders in Factory A. The female production workers in Factory A had a significantly lower WAI as compared to their male counterparts (p=0.001). WAI also varied significantly between different age groups and occupations in the two plants. Significant negative correlations were found between work ability and length of service, as well as between psychological resources and gender (Factory A) and the length of service (Factory B). WAI is a useful tool in finding vulnerable workers who need more attention from occupational health specialists.
1. Ilmarinen J, von Bonsdorff M. Work Ability. In: Wiley J, Sons, editors. The encyclopedia of adulthood and aging. Hoboken: Wiley- Blackwell; 2007. p. 1-5.
2. Ilmarinen J. Towards a longer worklife! Ageing and the quality of worklife in the European Union. Helsinki: Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Ministry of Social Affairs and Health; 2005.
3. Gould R, Ilmarinen J, Järvisalo J, Koskinen S, editors. Dimensions of work ability - results of the Health 2000 Survey. Helsinki: Finnish Centre for Pensions, The Social Insurance Institution, National Public Health Institute, Finnish Institute of Occupational Health; 2008.
4. Ebener M, Freude G, Hasselhorn H. Why WAI? Der Work Ability Index im Einsatz für Arbeitsfähigkeit und Prävention Erfahrungsberichte aus der Praxis. Dortmund: Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin; 2013. German.
5. Ilmarinen J. The Work Ability Index (WAI). Occup Med. 2007;57:160.
6. Bethge M, Radoschewski FM, Gutenbrunner C. The Work Ability Index as a screening tool to identify the need for rehabilitation: longitudinal findings from the second German sociomedical panel of employees. J Rehabil Med. 2012;44(11):980-7.
7. Roelen CAM, Heymans MW, Twisk JWR, van der Klink JJL, Groothoff JW, van Rhenen W. Work Ability Index as tool to identify workers at risk of premature work exit. J Occup Rehabil. 2014;24(4):747-54.
8. Coomer K, Houdmont J. Occupational health professionals’ knowledge, understanding and use of work ability. Occup Med. 2013;63(6):405- 9.
9. Kavaldzhieva B, Dimitrova T. [Assessment of work capacity of subjects from different professional groups by the Work Ability Index]. Scr Scien Med. 2011;43(7):77-9. Bulgarian.
10. Vangelova K, Dimitrova I, Tzenova B. Assessment of workability of teachers. Bulg J Public Health. 2014;6(1):19-28.
11. Vangelova K, Dimitrova I, Stanchev V. Risk factors for health and work ability of judicial clerks. Bulg J Public Health. 2014;6(4):10-20.
12. National Institute of Statistics. [Internet] Export, import and trade balance in Bulgaria by sectors of the Standard International Trade Classification (SITC, rev. 4) in 2014 and 2015. Sofia: National Institute of Statistics; 2016 [cited 2016 Sep 25]. Available from http://www.nsi.bg/bg/content/7512.
13. General Labor Inspectorate Executive Agency. [Health and safety profile of economic sectors “Manufacture of machinery and equipment for general and special purpose” and “Manufacture of metal products except machinery and equipment”]. Sofia: General Labor Inspectorate Executive Agency; 2013. Bulgarian.
14. Tuomi K, Ilmarinen J, Jahkola A, Katajarinne L, Tulkki A. Work Ability Index. 2nd revised ed. Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki; 1998.
15. Mincheva L, Vangelova K. [Work ability: determination using the Work Ability Index]. Sofia: National Center of Public Health and Analyses; 2008. Bulgarian.
16. Kujala V, Remes J, Ek E, Tammelin T, Laitinen J. Classification of Work Ability Index among young employees. Occup Med. 2005;55(5):399- 401.
17. McGonagle AK, Fisher GG, Barnes-Farrell JL, Grosch JW. Individual and work factors related to perceived work ability and labor force outcomes. J Appl Psychol. 2015;100(2):376-98.
18. Van den Berg TIJ, Elders LAM, de Zwart BCH, Burdorf A. The effects of work-related and individual factors on the Work Ability Index: a systematic review. Occup Environ Med. 2009;66:211-20.
19. El Fassi M, Bocquet V, Majery N, Lair ML, Couffignal S, Mairiaux P. Work ability assessment in a worker population: comparison and determinants of Work Ability Index and Work Ability Score. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:305.
20. Airila A, Hakanen J, Punakallio A, Lusa S, Luukkonen R. Is work engagement related to work ability beyond working conditions and lifestyle factors? Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2012;85(8):915-25.
21. Alavinia SM, van Duivenbooden C, Burdorf A. Influence of work-related factors and individual characteristics on work ability among Dutch construction workers. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2007;33(5):351-7.
22. Costa G, Sartori S. Ageing, working hours and work ability. Ergonomics. 2007;50(11):1914- 30.
23. Mazloumi A, Rostamabadi A, Saraji GN, Foroushani AR. Work Ability Index (WAI) and its association with psychosocial factors in one of the petrochemical industries in Iran. J Occup Health. 2012;54(2);112-8.
24. Lee YJ, Chang SR. A study on the Work Ability Index by the type of business, age and job. J Ergon Soc Korea. 2010;29(1):101-5.