Distribution of static pressure of seeds in a shallow model silo

Open access


The influence of the filling method, the seed size and the aspect ratio on the radial distribution of the vertical pressure on the floor of a shallow model silo and radial distribution of tangent stress within the material was investigated. Three filling methods were applied: central, circumferential and distributed. Seeds of five varieties were used: horse bean, field pea, wheat, vetch, and rapeseed. Vertical pressure on the floor of a shallow bin was found to be influenced by the filling method and the seed size and aspect ratio. A significant dip of vertical pressure in the middle radial location was observed in all tests, except two: central and circumferential filling of rapeseed. Wall friction was mobilized in the highest degree in the case of the central filling, while the lowest was mobilization of friction in the case of the circumferential filling.

ANSI/ASAE EP446.3, 2013. Loads exerted by Irish potatoes in shallow bulk storage structures. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, St. Joseph, Mi, USA.

ANSI/ASAE EP545, 2015. Loads exerted by free-lowing grain on shallow storage structures. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, St. Joseph, Mi, USA.

Balevičius R., Sielamowicz I., Mróz Z., and Kačianauskas R., 2011. Investigation of wall stress and outflow rate in a flatbottomed bin: A comparison of the DEM model results with the experimental measurements. Powder Technol., 214, 322-336.

Brockbank R., Huntley J.M., and Ball R.C., 1977. Contact force distribution beneath a tree-dimensional granular pile. J. Phys. II France, 7, 1521-1532.

Cowin S.C., 1977. The theory of static loads in bins. J. Appl. Mech., 44(3), 409-412.

Drescher A., 1991. Analytical methods in bin-load analysis. Elsevier, Amsterdam-Oxford-New York-Tokyo.

EN 1991-4, 2006. Eurocode 1. Basis of design and actions on structures e Part 4: Actions in silos and tanks. Rue de Stassart 36, B-1050 Brussels: European Committee for Standardization. Central Secretariat.

González-Montellano C., Gallego E., Ramírez-Gómez Á., and Ayuga F., 2012. Three dimensional discrete element models for simulating the filling and emptying of silos: Analysis of numerical results. Comput. Chem. Eng., 40, 22-32.

Horabik J., Parafiniuk P., and Molenda M., 2016. Experiments and discrete element method simulations of distribution of static load of grain bedding at bottom of shallow model silo. Biosyst. Eng., 149, 60-71.

Horabik J.A., Ross I.J., and Schwab C.V., 1988. Effects of spatial orientation on grain load distribution. Trans. ASAE, 31(6), 1787-1793.

Janssen H.A., 1895. Versuche über Getreidedruck in Silozellen. Verein Deutscher Ingenieure, Zeitschrift (Düsseldorf), 39, 1045-1049.

Liffman K., Nguyen M., Metcalfe G., and Cleary P., 2001. Forces in piles of granular material: An analytic and 3D DEM study. Granul. Matter, 3(3), 165-176.

Lvin J.B., 1971. Analytical evaluation of pressures of granular materials on silo walls. Powder Technol., 4, 280-285.

Masson S. and Martinez J., 2000. Effect of particle mechanical properties on silo flow and stress from distinct element simulations. Powder Technol., 109, 164-178.

McBridge W., 2006. Base pressure measurements under a scale model stockpile. Particul. Sci. Technol., 24, 59-70.

Mohsenin N.N., 1986. Physical properties of plant and animal materials. New York, Gordon and Breach Science Press, New York, USA.

Molenda M., Horabik J., and Ross I.J., 1996a. Effect of filling method on load distribution in model grain bins. Trans. ASAE, 39(1), 219-224.

Molenda M., Horabik J., and Ross I.J., 1996b. Pressure distribution and stress ratio in a model grain silo. XIII CIGR World Congress, Madrid, Spain, Paper 96B-008.

Nielsen J., 1983. Load distributions in silos influenced by anisotropic grain behaviour. Int. Conf. Bulk Materials, Storage, Handling and Transportation, Newcastle, NSW, Australia, August 22-24, The Institution of Engineers, Australia.

Nielsen J., 1998. Pressures from flowing granular solids in silos. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A, 356(1747), 2667-2684.

Oda M., 1978. Significance of fabric in granular mechanics. Proc. U.S.-Japan Seminar Continuum Mechanical and Statistical Approaches in the Mechanics of Granular Materials, June 5-9, Tokyo, Japan.

Pieper K., 1969. Investigation of silo loads in measuring models. J. Eng. Industry. Trans. ASME, 91, 365-372.

Roberts A.W., 1998. Particle technology ─ Reflections and horizons: An engineering perspective. Trans. IChemE, 76, Part A, 755-796.

Schwab C.V., Ross I.J., White G.M., and Colliver D.G., 1994. Wheat loads and vertical pressure distribution in a fullscale bin. 1. Filling. Trans. ASAE, 37(5), 1613-1619.

Schwab C.V., Ross I.J., White G.M., and Colliver D.G., 1996. Wheat loads and vertical pressure distribution in a fullscale bin. 2. Detention. Trans. ASAE, 39(3), 1145-1149.

Sykut J., Molenda M., and Horabik J., 2008. Influence of filling method on packing structure in model silo and DEM simulations. Granular Matter, 10, 273-278.

Thompson S.A. and Williams R.A., 1994. The effect of floor flexibility on the vertical pressures in a model grain bin. Trans. ASAE, 37(2), 623-628.

Wambaugh J.F., Harley R.R., and Behringer R.P., 2010. Force networks and elasticity in granular silos. Eur. Phys. J. E, 32(2), 135-145.

Wojnowski D.A. Bernhardt R., 2015. Analysis of Design Standards and Recommended Practices for Agricultural Storage Bins. Forensic Engineering 2015. Performance of the Built Environment, 756-765.

Zhou Ch. and Ooi J.Y., 2009. Numerical investigation of progressive development of granular pile with spherical and non-spherical particles. Mech. Mater., 41, 707-714.

Zhou Z.Y., Zou R.P., Pinson D., and Yu A.B., 2014. Angle of repose and stress distribution of sandpiles formed with ellipsoidal particles. Granular Matter, 16, 695-709.

International Agrophysics

The Journal of Institute of Agrophysics of Polish Academy of Sciences

Journal Information

IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 1.242
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.267

CiteScore 2017: 1.38

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.435
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.849

Cited By


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 233 227 16
PDF Downloads 88 84 7