Zeolite and swine inoculum effect on poultry manure biomethanation

Open access


Poultry manure is an ammonia-rich substrate that inhibits methanogenesis, causing severe problems to the anaerobic digestion process. In this study, the effect of different natural zeolite concentrations on the mesophilic anaerobic digestion of poultry waste inoculated with well-digested swine manure was investigated. A significant increase in methane production was observed in treatments where zeolite was added, compared to the treatment without zeolite.Methane production in the treatment with 10 g dm-3 of natural zeolite was found to be 109.75% higher compared to the treatment without zeolite addition. The results appear to be influenced by the addition of zeolite, which reduces ammonia toxicity in anaerobic digestion and by the ammonia-tolerant swine inoculum.

Angelidaki I., Karakashev D., Batstone D.J., Plugge C.M., andStams A.J.M., 2011. Biomethanation and Its Potential In: Methods in Enzymology (Eds C.R. Amy, W.R. Stephen). Academic Press, San Diego, USA.

APHA, 2005. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. APHA Press, Washington, DC, USA.

Ardic I. and Taner F., 2005. Effects of thermal, chemical and thermochemical pretreatments to increase biogas production yield of chicken manure. FreseniusEnviron. Bull., 14, 373-380.

Boe K., Batstone D.J., and Angelidaki I., 2007. An innovative online VFA monitoring system for the anerobic process, based on headspace gas chromatography. Biotechnol. Bioeng., 96, 712-721.

Bonmatí A. and Flotats X., 2003. Air stripping of ammonia from pig slurry: Characterisation and feasibility as a pre- or posttreatment to mesophilic anaerobic digestion. Waste Manag., 23, 261-272.

Bujoczek G., Oleszkiewicz J., Sparling R., and Cenkowski S.,2000. High Solid Anaerobic Digestion of Chicken Manure. J. Agric. Eng. Res., 76, 51-60.

Chen Y., Cheng J.J., and Creamer K.S., 2008. Inhibition of anaerobic digestion process:Areview. Biores. Technol., 99, 4044-4064.

Jung J.-Y., Chung Y.-C., Shin H.-S., and Son D.-H., 2004. Enhanced ammonia nitrogen removal using consistent biological regeneration and ammonium exchange of zeolite in modified SBR process. Water Res., 38, 347-354.

KotsopoulosT.A.,Fotidis I.A.,TsolakisN., andMartzopoulos G.G.,2009. Biohydrogen production from pig slurry in a CSTR reactor system with mixed cultures under hyper-thermophilic temperature (70°C). Biomass Bioenergy, 33, 1168-1174.

Kotsopoulos T.A., Karamanlis X., Dotas D., and MartzopoulosG.G., 2008. The impact of different natural zeolite concentrations on the methane production in thermophilic anaerobic digestion of pig waste. Biosys. Eng., 99, 105-111.

Kougias P.G., Kotsopoulos T.A., andMartzopoulos G.G., 2010. Anaerobic co-digestion of pig waste with olive mill wastewater under various mixing conditions. Fresenius Environ. Bull., 19, 1682-1686.

Milán Z., Montalvo S., de Las Pozas C., Monroy O., SánchezE., and Borja R., 2011. The effects of hydraulic loading and NaCl concentrations on the regeneration of exhausted homoionic natural zeolite. J. Environ. Sci. Health, 46, 596-600.

Milán Z., Sánchez E., Weiland P., Borja R., Martín A., andIlangovan K., 20011. Influence of different natural zeolite concentrations on the anaerobic digestion of piggery waste. Biores. Technol., 80, 37-43.

Montalvo S.,Díaz F., Guerrero L., Sánchez E., and BorjaR., 2005. Effect of particle size and doses of zeolite addition on anaerobic digestion processes of synthetic and piggery wastes. Process Biochem., 40, 1475-1481.

Montalvo S., Guerrero L., Borja R., Sánchez E., Milán Z.,Cortés I., and Angeles de la laRubiaM., 2012. Application of natural zeolites in anaerobic digestion processes:Areview. Appl. Clay Sci., 58, 125-133.

Montalvo S.,Guerrero L., Borja R., Travieso L., Sánchez E., andDíaz F., 2006. Use of natural zeolite at different doses and dosage procedures in batch and continuous anaerobic digestion of synthetic and swine wastes. Res. Conserv. Recyc., 47, 26-41.

Nakakubo R.,MollerH.B., Nielsen A.M., andMatsuda J., 2008. Ammonia inhibition of methanogenesis and identification of process indicators during anaerobic digestion. Environ. Eng. Sci., 25, 1487-1496.

Nielsen H.B. and Angelidaki I., 2008. Strategies for optimizing recovery of the biogas process following ammonia inhibition. Biores. Technol., 99, 7995-8001.

Ogunwande G.A., Ogunjimi L.A.O., and Fafiyebi J.O., 2008. Effects of turning frequency on composting of chicken litter in turned windrow piles. Int. Agrophysics, 22, 159-165.

Sakar S., YetilmezsoyK., andKocak E., 2009.Anaerobic digestion technology in poultry and livestock waste treatment - A literature review. Waste Manag. Res., 27, 3-18.

Salminen E. and Rintala J., 2002. Anaerobic digestion of organic solid poultry slaughterhousewaste-a review.Biores. Technol., 83, 13-26.

Tzamos E., Kantiranis N., Papastergios G., Vogiatzis D., FilippidisA., and Sikalidis C., 2011. Ammonium exchange capacity of the Xerovouni zeolitic tuffs, Avdella area, Evros Prefecture, Greece. Clay Minerals, 46, 179-187.

Venglovsky J., Sasakova N.,Vargova M., Pacajova Z., Placha I.,Petrovsky M., and Harichova D., 2005. Evolution of temperature and chemical parameters during composting of the pig slurry solid fraction amended with natural zeolite. Biores. Technol., 96, 181-189.

Yilmazel Y.D. and Demirer G.N., 2011. Removal and recovery of nutrients as struvite from anaerobic digestion residues of poultry manure. Environ. Technol., 32, 783-794.

International Agrophysics

The Journal of Institute of Agrophysics of Polish Academy of Sciences

Journal Information

IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 1.242
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.267

CiteScore 2018: 1.44

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.399
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.891

Cited By


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 224 166 12
PDF Downloads 121 103 14