Variability in Pavement Design

Open access

Abstract

This paper presents the results of a review on variability of key pavement design input variables (asphalt modulus and thickness, subgrade modulus) and assesses effects on pavement performance (fatigue and deformation life). Variability is described by statistical terms such as mean and standard deviation and by its probability density distribution.

The subject of reliability in pavement design has pushed many highway organisations around the world to review their design methodologies, mainly empirical, to move towards mechanistic-empirical analysis and design which provide the tools for the designer to evaluate the effect of variations in materials on pavement performance. This research has reinforced this need for understanding how the variability of design parameters affects the pavement performance.

This study has only considered flexible pavements. The sites considered for the analysis, all in the UK (including Northern Ireland), were mainly motorways or major trunk roads. Pavement survey data analysed were for Lane 1, the most heavily trafficked lane. Sections 1km long were considered wherever possible.

Statistical characterisation of the variation of layer thickness, asphalt stiffness and subgrade stiffness is addressed. A sensitivity analysis is then carried out to assess which parameter(s) have the greater influence on the pavement life.

The research shows that, combining the effect of all the parameters considered, the maximum range of 15th and 85th percentiles (as percentages of the mean) was found to be 64% to 558% for the fatigue life and 94% to 808% for the deformation life.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Aguiar-Moya J.P. Banerjee A. and Prozzi J.A. (2009) “Sensitivity Analysis of the M-E PDG Using Measured Probability Distributions of Pavement Layer Thickness” 88th Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting.

  • American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (1993) “AASHTO Guide for Design of Pavement Structures” Washington D.C.

  • American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (2008) “Mechanistic–Empirical Pavement Design Guide” Washington D.C.

  • American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (1985) “Proposed AASHTO Guide for Design of Pavement Structures NCHRP Project 20–7/24 Washington DC USA.

  • Collop A.C. (2000) “The Effect of Asphalt Layer Thickness Variations on Pavement Evaluation Using the Falling Weight Deflectometer” School of Civil Engineering Vol.1 (4) pp247-263.

  • Darter M. Hudson W. R. and Brown J. L. (1973) “Statistical variations of flexible pavement properties and their consideration in design” Proceedings Association of Asphalt Technologists Vol.42 pp589-613.

  • George K.P. and Husain S. (1986) “Thickness design for flexible pavement: a probabilistic approach” Transportation Research Record Vol.1095 pp26-36.

  • Highways Agency Design Manual for Roads and Bridges (DMRB) “HD 26 Pavement Design”.

  • Highways Agency Design Manual for Roads and Bridges (DMRB) “HD 29 Data for Pavement Assessment”.

  • Irwin L.H. Yang W.S. and Stubstad R.N. (1989) “Deflection Reading Accuracy and Layer Thickness Accuracy in Backcalculation of Pavement Layer Moduli” American Society for Testing and Materials.

  • Jiménez L.A. and Mrawira D. (2012) “Bayesian Regression in Pavement Deterioration Modeling: Revisiting the AASHO Road Test Rut Depth Model” Infraestructura Vial Nr 25.

  • Kim H. B. and Buch N. (2003) “Reliability-based pavement design model accounting for inherent variability of design parameters” 82nd Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting.

  • Noureldin A.S. Sharaf E. Arafah A. and Al-Sugair F. (1994) “Estimation of Standard Deviation of Predicted Performance of Flexible Pavements using AASHTO Model” Transportation Research Record Vol.1449 pp46-56.

  • Powell W.D. Potter J.F. Mayhew H.C. and Nunn M.E. (1984) “The structural design of bituminous roads” Transport and Road Research Laboratory LR 1132 UK.

  • Prozzi J.A. and Guo R. (2007) “Reliability-based approach for using LTPP and APT test results for estimating fatigue performance” 86th Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting.

  • Tighe S. (2001) “Guidelines for probabilistic pavement life cycle cost analysis” TRB Vol.1769 pp28-38.

  • Tighe S. He Z. and Haas R. (2001) “Environmental deterioration model for flexible pavement design: an Ontario example” 80th Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting.

  • Timm D.H. Newcomb D.E. and Galambos T.V. (2000) “Incorporation of reliability into Mechanistic-Empirical pavement design” Transportation Research Record Vol.1730 pp73-80.

  • TRB’s Transportation Research Circular E-C118 (2007) “Pavement Lessons Learned from the AASHO Road Test and Performance of the Interstate Highway System”.

  • Ullidtz P. (1987) “Pavement analysis” Elsevier.

  • Zollinger D.G. and McCullough B.F. (1994) “Development of Weibull Reliability factors and analysis for calibration of pavement Design Models Using Filed Data” Transportation Research Record Vol.1449 pp18-25.

Search
Journal information
Cited By
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 640 433 17
PDF Downloads 314 223 5