How to Stay Ahead of the Pack: Optimal Road Cycling Strategies for two Cooperating Riders

Open access


Within road-cycling, the optimization of performance using mathematical models has primarily been performed in the individual time trial. Nevertheless, most races are 'mass-start' events in which many riders compete at the same time. In some special situations, e.g. breakaways from the peloton, the riders are forced to team up. To simulate those cooperative rides of two athletes, an extension of models and optimization approaches for individual time trials is presented. A slipstream model based on experimental data is provided to simulate the physical interaction between the two riders. In order to simulate real world behavior, a penalty for the difference in the exertion levels of the two riders is introduced. This means, that even though both riders aim to be as fast as possible as a group, neither of them should have an advantage over the other because of significantly different levels of fatigue during the ride. In our simulations, the advantage of cooperation of two equally trained athletes adds up to a time gain of about 10% compared to an individual ride.

Aftalion, A., & Fiorini, C. (2015). A two-runners model: optimization of running strategies according to the physiological parameters. arXiv preprint arXiv:1508.00523.

Barry, N., Sheridan, J., Burton, D., & Brown, N. A. (2014). The effect of spatial position on the aerodynamic interactions between cyclists. Procedia Engineering, 72, 774-779.

Dahmen, T., Byshko, R., Saupe, D., Röder, M., & Mantler, S. (2011). Validation of a model and a simulator for road cycling on real tracks. Sports Engineering, 14(2-4), 95-110.

Dahmen, T., & Saupe, D. (2014). Optimal pacing strategy for a race of two competing cyclists. Journal of science and cycling, 3(2), 12.

Dahmen, T., Wolf, S., & Saupe, D. (2012). Applications of mathematical models of road cycling. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 45(2), 804-809.

Gordon, S. (2005). Optimising distribution of power during a cycling time trial. Sports Engineering, 8(2), 81-90.

Kyle, C. R. (1979). Reduction of wind resistance and power output of racing cyclists and runners travelling in groups. Ergonomics, 22(4), 387-397.

Martin, J. C., Milliken, D. L., Cobb, J. E., McFadden, K. L., & Coggan, A. R. (1998). Validation of a mathematical model for road cycling power. Journal of applied biomechanics, 14, 276-291.

Martin, J. C., Davidson, C. J., & Pardyjak, E. R. (2007). Understanding sprint-cycling performance: the integration of muscle power, resistance, and modeling. International journal of sports physiology and performance, 2(1), 5-21.

Monod, H., & Scherrer, J. (1965). The work capacity of a synergic muscular group. Ergonomics, 8(3), 329-338.

Morton, R. H. (1996). A 3-parameter critical power model. Ergonomics, 39(4), 611-619.

Morton, R. H. (1986). A three component model of human bioenergetics. Journal of mathematical biology, 24(4), 451-466.

Olds, T. (1998). The mathematics of breaking away and chasing in cycling. European journal of applied physiology and occupational physiology, 77(6), 492-497.

Patterson, M. A., & Rao, A. V. (2014). GPOPS-II: A MATLAB software for solving multiple-phase optimal control problems using hp-adaptive Gaussian quadrature collocation methods and sparse nonlinear programming. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software (TOMS), 41(1), 1.

Pitcher, A. B. (2009). Optimal strategies for a two-runner model of middle-distance running. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 70(4), 1032-1046.

Sundström, D., Carlsson, P., & Tinnsten, M. (2014). Comparing bioenergetic models for the optimisation of pacing strategy in road cycling. Sports Engineering, 17(4), 207-215.

Journal Information

CiteScore 2018: 0.71

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.355
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.462


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 342 164 6
PDF Downloads 170 123 17