Admission of Extrinsic Evidence for Contract Interpretation: The International Arbitration Culture in Light of the Traditional Divisions

Open access


Mergers and acquisition (M&A) operations generally follow wide due-dil­igence and investigation works. This suggests that a lot of elements outside of the final contract could help the judge or arbitrator interpret the intent of the parties. Yet, the common law tradition usually includes a so-called ‘parol evidence rule’ (PER) that pro­hibits the use of such evidence to this end, among numerous exceptions. Other legal tradition such as the civil law don’t include such rule. As transnational M&A operations now generally use international commercial arbitration (ICA) as a way to solve potential disputes, parties can wonder if these extrinsic evidence can be used in an ICA context, given its multicultural legal habits. To answer this question, this article analyses the cultural roots that explain the existence or absence of the PER, and matches them with the specificities of ICA. There are two main explanations for the distinction between common law and civil law regarding the PER. One is substantial and regards the con­tractual interpretation approach. The second depends on the culture regarding evidence and the existence of exclusionary rules. These two explanations don’t survive in ICA. Moreover, the specificities of ICA tend to encourage the admission of extrinsic evidence in contractual interpretation.

Aubry Charles, Rau Charles, Cours De Droit Civil Français. D’après La Méthode De Zacha­riae. 4th Ed., Paris 1869, Tome IV

Audit Mathias, Bollée Sylvain, Callé Pierre, Droit Du Commerce International Et Des Investissements Étrangers, 2016, LGDJ

Blackaby Nigel, Partasides Constantine, Redfern Alan, Hunter Martin, Red­fern And Hunter On International Arbitration, 2015, Oxford University Press, No. 6.01

Beeley M.J., The Little Differences: A Comparative Analysis Of Contractual Interpreta­tion Under The Laws Of England, India And New York, Transnational Dispute Manage­ment, Vol. 2, Issue 5; November 2005

Bell John, Boyron Sophie, Whittaker Simon, Principles Of French Law, Oxford University Press, 2007

Besson Sébastien, Dupeyron Carine, L’interprétation Du Contrat Et L’arbitrage, À La Lumière De La Réforme Du Droit Français Des Obligations, Revue De l’Arbitrage, 2017-1

Calleo Peter J., The Inapplicability Of The Parol Evidence Rule To The United Nations Convention On Contracts For The International Sale Of Goods, Hofstra Law Review, 2000, Vol. 28-3, Article 8.

CISG, Article 8 (3), Available At: Http://Www.Uncitral.Org/Pdf/English/Texts/Sales/Cisg/V1056997-CISG-E-Book.Pdf Accessed: April 5th 2018

Coates, John C. Managing Disputes Through Contract: Evidence From M&A, Harvard Business Law Review 295, 2012Cole Tony, The Parol Evidence Rule: A Comparative Analysis And Proposal, Unsw Law Journal Volume 26-3, 2003

Corbin Arthur L., The Parol Evidence Rule, The Yale Law Journal, Volume 53, Number 4, September 1944

Couret Alain, Les Cessions De Droits Sociaux, Revue De L’arbitrage, 2013, Issue 3

Derains Yves, Notes Under ICC Case No. 2291 Of 1975 JDI 1976

Ehle Bernd D., Arbitration As A Dispute Resolution Mechanism In Mergers And Acquisi­tions, Comparative Law Yearbook Of International Business, 2005, Volume 27

Epstein David And Baldwin Charles S., IV, International Litigation A Guide To Juris­diction, Practice And Strategy, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2010

Fathallah Raëd, Portwood Tim, Arbitrage Et Garantie De Passif, Questions De Preuve Et De Procédure, Droit Et Patrimoine 2008, No. 166

Fauvarque Cosson Bénédicte, L’interprétation Du Contrat: Observations Compara­tives, Revue Des Contrats, April 2007, N°2

Ferreri Silvia, Le Juge National Et L’interprétation Des Contrats Internationaux, Revue Internationale De Droit Comparé, Vol. 53 No. 1, 2001

Flour Jacques, Aubert Jean-Luc, Savaux Eric, Les Obligations, 1. L’acte Juridique, Dalloz Editions, 2014

Gaillard Emmanuel, Aspects Philosophiques Du Droit De L’arbitrage International, 2008, ADI Poche, Martinus NijhoffGessel-Kalinowska Vel Kalisz Beata, Representations And Warranties In Cross Border Mergers And Acquisitions: The Challenges Of Cultural Diversity, ICC Interna­tional Court Of Arbitration Bulletin, 2013, Vol. 24 No. 1

Hausmann Christian, Torre Philippe, Les Garanties De Passif, Les Éditions EFE, 2012International Chamber Of Commerce, ICC Rules, Last Edition, 2017, [Online], Available At Accessed: April 5th 2018

International Chamber Of Commerce, ICC Arbitral Awards On The Interpretation Of Con­tracts, ICC Bulletin, 25-1 2014

Karton Joshua D. H., The Arbitral Role In Contractual Interpretation, Queens’ Univer­sity Faculty Of Law, Research Paper Series, 2015-012, March 2015, [Online]. Available At: Https://Ssrn.Com/Abstract=2535160 (Accessed: 05.04.2018).

Karton Joshua D. H., International Commercial Arbitrators’ Approaches To Contrac­tual Interpretation ; International Business Law Journal, 2012

London Court Of International Arbitration, LCIA Rules, Last Edition, 2014, [Online], Available At : Accessed: April 5th 2018

Loquin Eric, L’arbitrage Du Commerce International, Lextenso Éditions 2015

Lévy Laurent, Robert-Tissot Fabrice, L’interprétation Arbitrale, Revue De l’Arbitrage, 2013-4

Lew Julian D.M., Mistelis Loukas A., Kröll Stefan, Comparative International Com­mercial Arbitration, Kluwer Law International 2003

Marild Erik, Oral Presentation Of Evidence And The Application Of The Parol Evidence Rule In International Arbitration, The American Review Of International Arbitration, 2013, Vol. 4, No. 2

Menon Sundaresh, Transnational Commercial Law: Realities, Challenges And A Call For Meaningful Convergence, Singapore Journal Of Legal Studies, 2013

Merlin, Répertoire Universel Et Raisonné De Jurisprudence, 4th Ed., 1812, Vol. 3

Moreau Bertrand, L’arbitrage Et L’efficacité De La Garantie De Passif, Revue De Jurispru­dence Commerciale, 2006, No. 1

Panhard Maxime, When Contractual Good Faith Meets A Controversial M&A Issue : The Sandbagging Practice In International Arbitration, The International Lawyer, 2018, Vol. 51, No. 1

Perillo Joseph M., The Origins Of The Objective Theory Of Contract Formation And Interpretation, Fordham Law Review, Volume 69, Issue 2, 2000

Posner Eric A., The Parol Evidence Rule, The Plain Meaning Rule, And The Principles Of Contractual Interpretation, University Of Pennsylvania Law Review, 1998, Vol. 146

Poudret Jean François, Besson Sébastien, Droit Comparé De L’arbitrage International, LGDJ, 2002

Racine Jean Baptiste, Droit De L’arbitrage, PUF 2016

Rosengren Jonas, Contract Interpretation In International Arbitration, Journal Of International Arbitration 1, 2013

Sandifer Durward V., Evidence Before International Tribunals, University Press Of Vir­ginia, 1975

Seraglini Christophe; Ortscheidt Jérôme: Droit De L’arbitrage Interne Et Interna­tional, Montchrestien 2013

Solan Lawrence, Rosenblatt Terri, Osherson Daniel, False Consensus Bias In Contract Interpretation, Columbia Law Review Vol. 107 November 2007 No. 7

Spigelman James, Contractual Interpretation: A Comparative Perspective,Paper Presented At The Third Judicial Seminar On Commercial Litigation, Sydney 23 March 2011, P. 3, [Online]. Available At: Accessed April 5th 2018

Steiner Eva, French Law, A Comparative Approach, Oxford University Press, 2010Unidroit Principles, 2016, [Online]. Available At: Accessed: April 5th 2018

Vergès Etienne, Vial Géraldine, Leclerc Olivier, Droit De La Preuve, Puf, 2015

Viandier Alain, Arbitrage Et Garanties De Passif, Revue De l’Arbitrage, 1994 Issue 3.

Journal Information

Target Group researchers and experts in the field of International law and EU Law


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 97 97 27
PDF Downloads 59 59 26