Bridging the gap between university and upper secondary school English studies: The ULE project

Open access

Adolphs, Svenja and Norbert Schmitt. 2003. Lexical coverage of spoken discourse. Applied Linguistics 24 (4): 425–438. doi:10.1093/applin/24.4.425

Allan, Rachel. 2010. Concordances versus dictionaries: Evaluating approaches to word learning in ESOL. In R. Chacón-Beltrán, C. Abello-Contesse, M. Mar Torreblanca-López and M. Dolores López-Jiménez (eds.). Further insights into non-native vocabulary teaching and learning, 112–125. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

Berggren, Jessica. 2015. Learning from giving feedback: A study of secondarylevel students. ELT Journal 69 (1): 58–70. doi:10.1093/elt/ccu036

Brown, Dale. 2010. What aspects of vocabulary knowledge do textbooks give attention to? Language Teaching Research 15 (1): 83–97. doi:10.1177/1362168810383345

Cobb, Tom. 1997. Is there any measurable learning from hands-on concordancing? System 25 (3): 301–15.

Cobb, Tom. Compleat Lexical Tutor [website]. Accessed 1 May 2017 at

Cobb, Tom. Compleat Web VP! [computer program]. Accessed 1 May 2017 at

Cobb, Tom. Text Lex Compare v.3 [computer program]. Accessed 1 May 2017 at

Corder, Stephen Pit. 1967. The significance of learner’s errors. IRAL–International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 5 (4), 161–170.

Council of Europe. 2001. Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Dubiner, Deborah. 2017. Using vocabulary notebooks for vocabulary acquisition and teaching. ELT Journal 71: 456–466. doi:10.1093/elt/ccx008

Engber, Cheryl. 1995. The relationship of lexical proficiency to the quality of ESL compositions. Journal of Second Language Writing 4: 139–155.

English Profile. 2012. English Vocabulary Profile [website]. Accessed 1 May 2017 at

Johansson, Christine and Christer Geisler. 2009. The Uppsala Learner English Corpus: A new corpus of Swedish high school students’ writing. In A. Saxena and Å. Viberg (eds.). Multilingualism: Proceedings of the 23rd Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics: Uppsala University, 1–3 October 2008, 181–190. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.

Johansson, Christine and Christer Geisler. 2011. Syntactic aspects of the writing of Swedish L2 learners of English. In J. Newman, H. Baayen and S. Rice (eds.). Corpus-based studies in language use, language learning, and language documentation, 139–155. Amsterdam: Rodopi.

Köhlmyr, Pia. 2003. To err is human... An investigation of grammatical errors in Swedish 16-year-old learners’ written production in English. Göteborg: Göteborg University.

Laufer, Batia. 1990. Words you know: How they affect the words you learn. In J. Fisiak (ed.). Further insights into contrastive analysis, 573–593. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: Benjamins.

Laufer, Batia. 1997. What’s in a word that makes it hard or easy: Some intralexical factors that affect the learning of words. In N. Schmitt and M. McCarthy (eds.). Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy, 140–155. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Laufer, Batia. 2005. Focus on form in second language vocabulary learning. In EUROSLA Yearbook 5: 223–250. doi: 10.1075/eurosla.5.11lau

Laufer, Batia and Geke C. Ravenhorst-Kalovski. 2010. Lexical threshold revisited: Lexical text coverage, learners’ vocabulary size and reading comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language 22 (1): 15–30.

Lundstrom, Kristi and Wendy Baker. 2009. To give is better than to receive: The benefits of peer review to the reviewer’s own writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 18 (1): 30–43. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2008.06.002

Melka, Francine. 1997. Receptive vs. productive aspects of vocabulary. In N. Schmitt and M. McCarthy (eds.). Vocabulary: Description, acquisition, and pedagogy, 84–102. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nation, I. S. P. 2001. Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nation, I. S. P. 2006. How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening? Canadian Modern Language Review 63 (1): 59–82.

Olsen, S. 1999. Errors and compensatory strategies: A study of grammar and vocabulary in texts written by Norwegian learners of English. System 27 (2): 191–205. doi:

Read, John. 2000. Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Rouhi, Afsar and Elnaz Azizian. 2013. Peer review: Is giving corrective feedback better than receiving it in L2 Writing? Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 93: 1349–1354. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.042

Schmitt, Norbert. 2000. Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Schmitt, Norbert. 2008. Instructed second language vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research 12: 329–363. doi:10.1177/1362168808089921

Schmitt, Norbert. 2014. Size and depth of vocabulary knowledge: What the research shows. Language Learning 64 (4): 913–951. doi:10.1111/lang.12077

Schmitt, Norbert and Diane Schmitt. 1995. Vocabulary notebooks: Theoretical underpinnings and practical suggestions. ELT Journal 49 (2): 133–143.

Schmitt, Norbert and Diane Schmitt. 2014. A reassessment of frequency and vocabulary size in L2 vocabulary. Language Teaching 47 (4): 484–503. doi:10.1017/S0261444812000018

Selinker, Larry. 1972. Interlanguage. IRAL – International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 10 (1–4): 209–232. doi:10.1515/iral.1972.10.1-4.209

Stæhr, Lars Stenius. 2008. Vocabulary size and the skills of listening, reading and writing. Language Learning Journal 36 (2): 139–152. doi:10.1080/09571730802389975

Swedish National Agency for Education (Skolverket). 2011a. Curriculum for the English subject at upper secondary school.!/English%20120912.pdf

Webb, Stuart and Michael P. H. Rodgers. 2009. Vocabulary demands of television programs. Language Learning 59 (2): 335–366. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00509.x

Wilcox, Kristen Campbell, Robert Yagelski and Fang Yu. 2014. The nature of error in adolescent student writing. Reading and Writing 27 (6): 1073–1094. doi:10.1007/s11145-013-9492-x

Yu, Guoxing. 2010. Lexical diversity in writing and speaking task performances. Applied Linguistics 31 (2): 236–259.

Journal Information


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 156 156 15
PDF Downloads 104 104 7