Comparison of network processes between successful and unsuccessful offensive sequences in elite soccer

Open access


Purpose. The study aimed to compare social network analysis (SNA) general measures and centrality levels of successful and unsuccessful offensive sequences performed by elite national teams in 64 matches of the FIFA World Cup 2014 tournament and to compare the level of centrality between playing positions. Methods. Adjacency matrices of passing sequences within an offensive unit were built and treated in a dedicated SNA software. Results. The main results indicated significantly lower values of total links and network density in successful sequences in comparison with unsuccessful ones in the teams that achieved the round of 8, semifinals, and the final. The comparisons between playing positions revealed that forwards showed the highest values of indegree centrality (balls received) and that midfielders presented the highest values of outdegree centrality (ball passed) in both successful and unsuccessful offensive units. Midfielders also exhibited the highest values of betweenness centrality (intermediation between teammates) in unsuccessful sequences and forwards in successful ones. Conclusions. Greater cooperation among teammates may not be determinant for successful sequences. Forwards are the prominent players to receive the ball and intermediate the passing sequence in offenses that end in a goal.

1. Gréhaigne JF, Godbout P, Zerai Z. How the “rapport de forces” evolves in a soccer match: the dynamics of collective decisions in a complex system. Rev Psicol del Deport. 2011;20(2):747-765.

2. Passos P, Milho J, Fonseca S, Borges J, Araújo D, Davids K. Interpersonal distance regulates functional grouping tendencies of agents in team sports. J Mot Behav. 2011;43(2):155-163; doi:

3. Lago-Peñas C, Lago-Ballesteros J. Game location and team quality effects on performance profiles in professional soccer. J Sport Sci Med. 2011;10(3):465-471.

4. Clemente FM, Martins FML, Kalamaras D, Wong DP, Mendes RS. General network analysis of national soccer teams in FIFA World Cup 2014. Int J Perform Anal Sport. 2015;15(1):80-96.

5. Duch J, Waitzman JS, Amaral LA. Quantifying the performance of individual players in a team activity. PLoS One. 2010;5(6):e10937; doi:

6. Grund TU. Network structure and team performance: the case of English Premier League soccer teams. Soc Networks. 2012;34(4):682-690; doi:

7. Clemente FM, Martins FML, Mendes RS. Social network analysis applied to team sports analysis. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2016.

8. Peña JL, Touchette H. A network theory analysis of football strategies. In: Clanet C (ed.), Sports physics: proceedings of 2012 Euromech physics of sports conference. Palaiseau: Éditions de l’École polytechnique; 2012; 517-528.

9. Clemente FM, Martins FML, Wong DP, Kalamaras D, Mendes RS. Midfielder as the prominent participant in the building attack: a network analysis of national teams in FIFA World Cup 2014. Int J Perform Anal Sport. 2015;15(2):704-722.

10. Cotta C, Mora AM, Merelo JJ, Merelo-Molina C. A network analysis of the 2010 FIFA world cup champion team play. J Syst Sci Complex. 2013;26(1):21-42; doi:

11. Clemente FM, Martins FML, Mendes RS. Analysis of scored and conceded goals by a football team throughout a season: a network analysis. Kinesiology. 2016; 48(1):103-114.

12. Malta P, Travassos B. Characterization of the defenseattack transition of a soccer team [in Portuguese]. Motricidade. 2014;10(1):27-37; doi:

13. Robinson G, O’Donoghue P. A weighted kappa statistic for reliability testing in performance analysis of sport. Int J Perform Anal Sport. 2007;7(1):12-19.

14. Kalamaras D. Social Networks Visualizer (SocNetV): social network analysis and visualization software. Soc Networks Vis. 2014.

15. Clemente FM, Couceiro MS, Martins FML, Mendes RS. Using network metrics in soccer: a macro-analysis. J Hum Kinet. 2015;45(1):123-134; doi:

16. Wasserman S, Faust K. Social network analysis: methods and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1994.

17. Rubinov M, Sporns O. Complex network measures of brain connectivity: uses and interpretations. Neuroimage. 2010;52(3):1059-1069; doi:

18. Ferguson CJ. An effect size primer: a guide for clinicians and researchers. Prof Psychol Res Pract. 2009;40(5): 532-538; doi:

19. Pina TJ, Paulo A, Araújo D. Network characteristics of successful performance in association football. A study on the UEFA Champions League. Front Psychol. 2017; 8:1173; doi:

Human Movement

The Journal of University School of Physical Education, Wroclaw

Journal Information

CiteScore 2016: 0.41

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.208
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.230


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 189 189 25
PDF Downloads 95 95 11