Evaluation of Laterality in the Snowboard Basic Position

Open access

Abstract

Purpose. Snowboarding requires a lateral positioning of the body. Moreover, a person must continuously control their balance and use this in order to manoeuvre on the slope applying properly pressure on the lower limb closest to the nose of the board (the leading leg). The present study is an attempt to determine the interdependencies between side preference while snowboarding and laterality when performing other tasks. The dynamic stability in the neutral standing position, as well as in the lateral positions (left or right) was also evaluated.

Methods. The survey participants (100 active snowboarders) answered a set of questions concerning laterality while carrying out basic everyday tasks and while doing sports. The respondents were divided into two groups based on their preferred leading side in snowboarding. Additionally, in the case of 34 people, muscle torques values of the lower limbs were measured under static conditions and the postural stability was evaluated using AccuSway AMTI platform and Biodex Balance System platform.

Results. Over 90% of the participants declared right-handedness and right-footedness. However, with regard to snowboarding, only 66% indicated their right leg as leading. No significant dependence was found between the directional stance on the board and the leading hand, dominant leg, or leading eye. The stability measurements revealed statistically significant differences between the neutral stance and the lateral positioning.

Conclusions. Based on the study results, it may be assumed that the declared directional stance on the snowboard is not contingent on the person’s basic laterality, and that the lateral stance on the board significantly affects the posture control.

1.

LeMaster R., Ultimate Skiing. Human Kinetics, Champaign, 2010.

2.

Spörri J., Kröll J., Schwameder H., Schiefermüller C., Müller E., Course setting and selected biomechanical variables related to injury risk in alpine ski racing: an explorative case study. Br J Sports Med, 2012, 46 (15), 1072–1077, .

3.

Grimshaw P., Lees A., Fowler N., Burden A., Sport & Exercise Biomechanics (BIOS Instant Notes). Taylor & Francis Group, London 2006.

4.

DiStefano L.J., Clark M.A., Padua D.A., Evidence supporting balance training in healthy individuals: a systemic review. J Strength Cond Res, 2009, 23 (9), 2718–2731, .

5.

Klous M., Müller E., Schwameder H., Three-dimensional lower extremity joint loading in a carved ski and snowboard turn: a pilot study. Comput Math Methods M, 2014, 1–13, .

6.

Platzer H.P., Raschner C., Patterson C., Lembert S., Comparison of physical characteristics and performance among elite snowboarders. J Strength Cond Res, 2009, 23 (5), 1427–1432, .

7.

Noé F., Paillard T., Is postural control affected by expertise in alpine skiing? Br J Sports Med, 2005, 39 (11), 835–837, .

8.

Delorme S., Tavoularis S., Lamontagne M., Kinematics of the ankle joint complex in snowboarding. J Appl Biomech, 2005, 21 (4), 394–403.

9.

McAlpine P., Kurpiers N., Kersting U., Determan J., Borrani F., Biomechanical analyses of snowboard jump landings. Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference on Biomechanics in Sports, 2–6 July 2012 Melbourne, pp. 105–108. Available from: https://ojs.ub.uni-konstanz.de/cpa/article/view/5172.

10.

Badau D., Relationship between space orientation and manual laterality. Annals of the University Dunarea de Jos of Galati: Fascicle XV: Physical Education & Sport Management, 2011, 2, 12–16.

11.

Danielsson T., Asymmetry in elite snowboarders. A study comparing range of motion in the hip and spine, power in lower extremities and circumference of thigh. Student thesis, Halmstad University School of Business and Engineering, Halmstad 2010, .

12.

Macedo L.G., Magee D.J., Differences in range of motion between dominant and nondominant sides of upper and lower extremities. J Manipulative Physiol Ther, 2008, 31 (8), 577–582, .

13.

Ilnicka L., Trzaskoma Z., Wiszomirska I., Wit A., Wychowański M., Lower limb laterality versus foot structure in men and women. Biomed Hum Kinetics, 2013, 5 (1), 28–42, .

14.

Straton A., Ene Voiculescu C., Straton C., Gidu D., Laterality – determinant factors influences. Sci Mov Health, 2012, 12 (2 Suppl), 491–495. Available from: http://www.analefefs.ro/anale-fefs/2012/issue-2-s/pe-autori/39.pdf.

15.

Vařeka I., Vařeková R., Lehnert M., Kolář P., Stejskal D., The effect of foot type and laterality on ankle sprain in elite female volleyball athletes. Kinesiology, 2009, 41 (2), 164–171. Available from: http://hrcak.srce.hr/index.php?show=clanak&id_clanak_jezik=70897.

16.

Yoon T.L., Cynn H.S., Choi S.A., Choi W.J., Lee J.H., Asymmetrical trunk muscle activities and kinematics during dominant and nondominant leg lifts in subjects with lumbar rotation with flexion syndrome. Isokinet Exerc Sci, 2014, 22 (2), 145–151, .

17.

Voyer D., Doyle R.A., Response format, magnitude of laterality effects, and sex differences in laterality. Laterality, 2012, 17 (3), 259–274, .

18.

Štochl J., Croudace T.J., On the measurement level of handedness scores. AUC Kinanthropologica, 2012, 48 (2), 179–188. Available from: http://www.cupress.cuni.cz/ink2_stat/index.jsp?include=AUC_cislo&predkl=0&zobrazAll=1&zalozka=0&id=3283&casopis=89.

19.

Giglia G., Brighina F., Zangla D., Bianco A., Chiavetta E., Palma A., Fierro B., Visuospatial attention lateralization in volleyball players and in rowers. Percept Mot Skills, 2011, 112 (3), 915–925, .

20.

Vaverka F., Vodickova S., Laterality of the lower limbs and carving turns. Biol Sport, 2010, 27, 129–134.

21.

Jandová S., Charousek J., Laterality of lower limbs during V2 Alternate in Nordic combined athletes. Hum Mov, 2013, 14 (3), 217–220, .

22.

Fischer S.L., Picco B.R., Wells R.P., Dickerson C.R., The roles of whole body balance, shoe-floor friction, and joint strength during maximum exertions: searching for the “weakest link”. J Appl Biomech, 2013, 29 (1), 1–11.

23.

Hiroshige K., Mahbub M.H., Harada N., Effects of whole-body vibration on postural balance and proprioception in healthy young and elderly subjects: a randomised crossover study. J Sports Med Phys Fitness, 2014, 54 (2), 216–224.

24.

Myer G.D., Ford K.R., Brent J.L., Hewett T.E., The effects of plyometric vs. dynamic stabilization and balance training on power, balance, and landing force in female athletes. J Strength Cond Res, 2006, 20 (2), 345–353.

25.

Sgrò F., Licari D., Coppola R., Lipoma M., Assessment of balance abilities in elderly people by means of a clinical test and a low-cost force plate. Kinesiology, 2015, 47 (1), 33–43. Available from: http://hrcak.srce.hr/140249.

26.

Gorman P.P., Butler R.J., Rauh M.J., Kiesel K., Plisky P.J., Differences in dynamic balance scores in one sport versus multiple sport high school athletes. Int J Sports Phys Ther, 2012, 7 (2), 148–153.

27.

Lynn S.K, Padilla R.A., Tsang K.K., Differences in static- and dynamic-balance task performance after 4 weeks of intrinsic-foot-muscle training: the short-foot exercise versus the towel-curl exercise. J Sport Rehabil, 2012, 21 (4), 327–333.

Human Movement

The Journal of University School of Physical Education, Wroclaw

Journal Information


CiteScore 2016: 0.41

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.208
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.230

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 231 231 22
PDF Downloads 84 84 9