Purpose. While take-off accuracy and approach run velocity are known determinants of long and triple jump performance, the interaction of these factors with step length adjustment (SLA) is not as clear. Methods. The study involved 39 male and 31 female national-level long and triple jumpers. The Optojump Next device was used to analyse jump attempts. Three groups were identified according to maximum variability of footfall placement (HVF - high, MVF - medium, LVF - Low) as well as three groups regarding the onset of step length adjustment (ESLA - early, MSLA - mid, LSLA - late). Results. Take-off accuracy in the LVF and MVF groups was greater compared with the HVF group among females. Among males, the LVF group made significantly (p < 0.05) fewer foul attempts than the HVF group. The ESLA group achieved significantly (p < 0.05) higher velocity during the last five steps of the approach run than the LSLA group in men. Conclusions. Coaches should implement exercises targeting SLA in long and triple jump training exercises to improve performance.
1. Hay J.G., Approach strategies in the long jump. Int J Sport Biomech, 1988, 4 (2), 114-129.
2. Wilson C., Simpson S., Hamill J., Movement coordination patterns in triple jump training drills. J Sports Sci, 2009, 27 (3), 277-282, doi: 10.1080/02640410802482433.
3. Graham-Smith P., Lees A., A three-dimensional kinematic analysis of the long jump take-off. J Sports Sci, 2005, 23 (9), 891-903, doi: 10.1080/02640410400022169.
4. Bridgett L.A., Linthorne N.P., Changes in long jump takeoff technique with increasing run-up speed. J Sports Sci, 2006, 24 (8), 889-897, doi: 10.1080/02640410500298040.
5. Bae Y.-S., Park Y.-J., Park J.-J., Lee J.-S., Chae W.-S., Park S.-B., Sport Biomechanics research project in IAAF World Championships Daegu 2011. Korean Journal of Sport Biomechanics, 2011, 21 (5), 503-510, doi: 10.5103/ KJSB.2011.21.5.503.
6. Hay J.G., Koh T.J., Evaluating the approach in the horizontal jumps. Int J Sport Biomech, 1988, 4 (4), 372-392.
7. Hommel H., Biomechanical analyses of selected events at the 12th IAAF World Championships in Athletics, Berlin 15-23 August 2009. A Project by the German Athletics Federation, Deutscher Leichtathletik-Verband, Darmstadt, Germany 2009.
8. Omura I., Iiboshi A., Koyama H., Muraki Y., Ae M., Influence of the visual control point on the accuracy and the performance of the elite junior long jumper. J Biomech, 2007, 40 (Suppl. 2), S752, doi: 10.1016/S0021-9290(07) 70740-6.
9. Moura N.A., de Paula Moura T.F., Borin J.P., Approach speed and performance in the horizontal jumps: What do Brazilian athletes do? New Studies in Athletics, 2005, 20 (3), 43-48.
10. Campos J., Gamez J., Encarnacion A., Gutierrez-Davila M., Rojas J., Wallace E., Three-dimensional kinematics during the take-off phase in competitive long jumping. Int J Sports Sci Coach, 2013, 8 (2), 395-406, doi: 10.1260/1747-95220.127.116.115.
11. Panteli F.N., Theodorou A., Pilianidis T., Smirniotou A., Locomotor control in the long jump approach run in young novice athletes. J Sports Sci, 2014, 32 (2), 149-156, doi: 10.1080/02640414.2013.810344.
12. Scott M.A., Li F.X, Davids K., Expertise and the regulation of gait in the approach phase of the long jump. J Sports Sci, 1997, 15 (6), 597-605, doi: 10.1080/026404197367038.
13. Theodorou A., Skordilis E., Evaluating the approach run of class F11 visually impaired athletes in triple and long jumps. Percept Mot Skills, 2012, 114 (2), 595-609, doi: 10.2466/05.15.27.PMS.114.2.595-609.
14. Bradshaw E.J., Aisbett B., Visual guidance during competition performance and run through training in long jumping. Sports Biomech, 2006, 5 (1), 1-14, doi: 10.1080/14763141.2006.9628221.
15. Bradshaw E.J., Maulder P.S., Keogh J.W.L., Biological movement variability during the sprint start: Performance enhancement or hindrance? Sports Biomech, 2007, 6 (3), 246-260, doi: 10.1080/14763140701489660.
16. Schoellhorn W.I., Bauer H.U., Identifying individual movement styles in high performance sports by means of selforganizing Kohonen maps. In: Richle H.J., Vieten M. (eds.), Proceedings of the XVI Annual Conference of the International Society for Biomechanics in Sport; 1998 July 7-12, Konstanz, Germany. International Society for Biomechanics in Sport, Universitatsverlag, Konstanz 1998, 574-577.
17. Maraj B., Allard F., Elliott D., The effect of nonregulatory stimuli on the triple jump approach run. Res Q Exerc Sport, 1998, 69 (2), 129-135, doi: 10.1080/02701367.1998.10607678.
18. Maraj B., Evidence for programmed and visually controlled phases of the triple jump approach run. New Studies in Athletics, 1999, 14 (1), 51-56.
19. Galloway M., Connor K., The effect of steering on stride pattern and velocity in long jump. In: Sanders R.H., Gibson B.J. (eds.), Scientific Proceedings of the XVII International Symposium on Biomechanics in Sport. Edith Cowan University, Perth 1999, 41-44.
20. Pereira C.F., Marques I., Okazaki V.H.A., Practice effects on fast and accurate spatially constrained movements. Hum Mov, 2014, 15 (1), 4-11, doi: 10.2478/humo-2013-0046.
21. Niźnikowski T., Sadowski J., Mastalerz A., The effectiveness of different types of verbal feedback on learning complex movement tasks. Hum Mov, 2013, 14 (2), 148-153, doi: 10.2478/humo-2013-0009.