Norms for an Isometric Muscle Endurance Test

Open access

Abstract

Musculoskeletal performance assessment is critical in the analysis of physical training programs in order to prioritize goals for decreasing injury risk and focusing performance goals. Abdominal endurance as part of this analysis is often assessed with techniques that have validity that has been debated in literature. The purpose of this study was to develop normative sex- and athlete-specific percentiles for a trunk stabilization and muscular endurance by using a prone forearm plank test in college-aged students. A second purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of habitual physical activity and the reason for test termination. There were 471 participants (means [xxx] SE; males: n = 194, age 20.4 [xxx] 0.2 years, body height 179.4 [xxx] 0.5 cm, body mass 81.1 [xxx] 1.2 kg; females: n = 277, age 20.2 [xxx] 0.2 years, body height 165.7 [xxx] 0.4 cm, body mass 63.9 [xxx] 0.7 kg) who performed this test to volitional or technique failure. Males produced significantly higher test durations than females (means [xxx] SD; 124 [xxx] 72 seconds vs. 83 [xxx] 63 seconds) and athletes produced significantly longer test durations than non-athletes (123 [xxx] 69 s vs. 83 [xxx] 63 s) but no interaction effects were seen in the variables of sex and athletic status. The activity level was found to have a threshold of influence (>3 times/week) on abdominal endurance that is dose-specific where greater than 5 times/week showed the greatest influence. The fatigue of the abdominals was the termination reason producing the lowest test duration and there was no sex effect on reason for test termination. These normative percentiles for abdominal endurance suggest that the abdominal plank test can now be used as an alternative to other abdominal assessments in college students, but further investigation is warranted prior to confirmation and generalization to other populations.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Aggarwal A Kumar S Kumar D. Effect of core stabilization training on the lower back endurance in recreationally active individuals. J Musculoskelet Res 2010; 13: 167-176

  • Akuthota V. Core strengthening. Arch Phys Med Rehab 2004; 85: S86-S92

  • Andersson EA Nilsson J Ma Z Thorstensson A. Abdominal and hip flexor muscle activation during various training exercises. Eur J Appl Physiolo 1997; 75: 115-123

  • Baxter RE Moore JH Pendergrass TL Crowder TA Lynch S. Improvement in sit-up performance associated with 2 different testing regimens. J Ortho Sports Phys 2003; 33: 40-47

  • Bird M Fletcher KM Koch AJ. Electromyographic comparison of the ab-slide and crunch exercises. J Strength Cond Res 2006; 20: 436-440

  • Bliss LS Teeple P. Core stability: The centerpiece of any training program. Curr Sport Med Report 2005; 4: 179-183

  • Childs JC Teyhen DS Casey PR McCoy-Singh KA Feldtmann AW Wright AC Dugan JL Wu SS George SZ. Effects of traditional sit-up training versus core stabilization exercises on short-term musculoskeletal injuries in us army soldiers: A cluster randomized trial. Phys Ther 2010; 90: 1404-1412

  • Diener MH Golding LA Diener D. Validity and reliability of a one-minute half sit-up test of abdominal strength and endurance. Sports Med Train Rehab 1995; 6: 105-119

  • Ekstrom RA Donatelli RA Carp KC. Electromyographic analysis of core trunk hip and thigh muscles during 9 rehabilitation exercises. J Ortho Sport Phys Ther 2007; 37: 754-762

  • Escamilla RF Babb E DeWitt R Jew P Kelleher P Burnham T Busch J D'Anna K Mowbray R Imamura RT.

  • Electromyographic analysis of traditional and nontraditional abdominal exercises: Implications for rehabilitation and training. Phys Ther 2006; 86: 656-671

  • Faries MD Greenwood M. Core training: Stabilizing the confusion. Strength Cond J 2007; 29: 10-25

  • Hall GL Hetzler RK Perrin D Weltman A. Relationship of timed sit-up tests to isokinetic abdominal strength. Res Q Exercise Sport 1992; 63: 80-84

  • Hussain I Sharma K Ashan M. Electromyographic comparison of concentric and eccentric contraction phase in abdominal exercises. S Afr J Res in Sport Phys Educ Recreation 2007; 29: 59-66

  • Jette M Sidney K Cicutti N. A critical analysis of sit-ups: A case for the partial curl-up as a test of abdominal muscular endurance. Can Assoc Health Phys Educ Recreation J 1984; 51: 4-9

  • Joynt RL Findley TW Boda W Daum MC. Therapeutic exercise. Philadelphia PA: Lippincott Company; 1993

  • Juker D McGill S Kropf P Steffen T. Quantitative intramuscular myoelectric activity of lumbar portions of psoas and the abdominal wall during a wide variety of tasks. Med Sci Sport Exer 1998; 30: 301-310

  • Kibler WB Press J Sciascia A. The role of core stability in athletic function. Sports Med 2006; 36: 189-198

  • Knudson D. Issues in abdominal fitness: Testing and technique. J Phys Educ Rec Dance 1999; 70: 49-64

  • Knudson D Johnston D. Validity and reliability of a bench trunk-curl test of abdominal endurance. J Strength Cond Res 1995; 9: 165-169

  • Lieber R. Skeletal muscle physiology. In T. Julet (Ed.) Skeletal muscle structure function and plasticity. Philadelphia PA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins 45-112; 2002

  • Liemohm W Snodgrass LB Sharpe GL. Unresolved controversies in back management - a review. J Ortho Sport Phys 1988; 9: 239-244

  • McGill SM. The mechanics of torsof lexion: Situps and standing dynamic flexion manoeuvres. Clin Biomech 1995; 10: 184-192

  • Moraes AC Pinto RS Valamatos MJ Valamatos MJ Pezarat-Correia PL Okano AH Santos PM Cabri JM.

  • Emg activation of abdominal muscles in the crunch exercise performed with different external loads.Phys Ther Sport 2009; 10: 57-62

  • Nachemson A Elfstrom G. Intravital dynamic pressure measurements in lumbar discs. Scand J Rehabil Med Supp 1970; 1: 1-40

  • Nadler SF Malanga GA Feinberg JH Rubanni M Moley P Foye P. Functional performance deficits in athletes with previous lower extremity injury. Clin J Sport Med 2002; 12: 73-78

  • Nordin M Frankel VH. Basic biomechanics of the musculoskeletal system (3rd ed.). Baltimore MD: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2001

  • Putnam CA. Sequential motions of body segments in striking and throwing skills. J Biomech 1993; 26: 125-135

  • Richardson CA Jull GA. Muscle control - pain control. What exercises would you prescribe? Manual Ther 1995; 1: 2-10

  • Schellenberg KL Lang JM Chan KM Burnham RS. A clinical tool for office assessment of lumbar spine stabilization endurance. Am J Phys Med Rehab 2007; 86: 380-386

  • Sternlicht E Rugg S. Elctromyographic analysis of abdominal muscle activity using portable abdominal exercise devices and a traditional crunch. J Strength Cond Res 2003; 17: 463-468

  • Thomas S Reading J Shephard R. Revision of the physical activity readiness questionnaire (par-q). Can J Sport Sci 1992; 14: 338-345

  • Tsai YS Sell TC Myers JB. The relationship between hip muscle strength and golf performance. Med Sci Sport Exer 2004; 36: S9

  • Warden SJ Wajswelner H Bennell KL. Comparison of abshaper and conventionally performed abdominal exercises using surface electromyography. Med Sci Sport Exer 1999; 31: 1656-1664

  • Watkins RG Uppal GS Perry J Pink M Dinsay JM. Dynamic electromyographic analysis of trunk musculature in professional golfers. Am J Sport Med 1996; 24: 535-538

Search
Journal information
Impact Factor


IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 1,414
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1,858

CiteScore 2018: 1.60

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.644
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.941

Cited By
Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 2035 1517 60
PDF Downloads 1161 945 19