The Appropriateness of the Helical Axis Technique and Six Available Cardan Sequences for the Representation of 3-D Lead Leg Kinematics During the Fencing Lunge

Open access

Cardan/Euler angles represent the most common technique for the quantification of segmental rotations. Cardan angles are influenced by their ordered sequence, and sensitive to planar-cross talk from the dominant rotation plane, which may affect the angular parameters. The International Society of Biomechanics (ISB) currently recommends a sagittal, coronal, and then transverse (XYZ) ordered sequence, although it has been proposed that when quantifying non-sagittal rotations this may not be the most appropriate technique. This study examined the influence of the helical and six available Cardan sequences on lower extremity three-dimensional (3-D) kinematics of the lead leg during the fencing lunge. Kinematic data were obtained using a 3-D motion capture system as participants completed simulated lunges. Repeated measures ANOVAs were used to compare discrete kinematic parameters, and intraclass correlations were also utilized to determine evidence of planar crosstalk. The results indicate that in all three planes of rotation, peak angle and range of motion angles using the YXZ and ZXY sequences were significantly greater than the other sequences. It was also noted that the utilization of the YXZ and ZXY sequences was associated with the strongest correlations from the sagittal plane, and the XYZ sequence was found habitually to be associated with the lowest correlations. It appears that for accurate representation of 3-D kinematics of the lead leg during the fencing lunge, the XYZ sequence is the most appropriate and as such its continued utilization is encouraged.

Areblad M, Nigg BM, Ekstrand J, Olsson O, Ekström H. Three-dimensional measurement of rearfoot motion during walking. J Biomech, 1990; 23: 933-940

Bell AL, Brand RA, Pedersen DR. Prediction of hip joint centre location from external landmarks. Hum MovSci, 1989; 8: 3-16

Cappozzo A, Catani F, Leardini A, Benedet, MG, Della CU. Position and orientation in space of bones during movement: Anatomical frame definition and determination. Clin Biomech, 1995; 10: 171-178

Cappozzo A, Cappello A, Croce U, Pensalfini F. Surface-marker cluster design criteria for 3-D bone movement reconstruction. IEEE T Bio-Med Eng, 1997; 44: 1165-1174

Hamill J, Selbie WS. Three-dimensional kinematics: In Robertson GM, Hamill J, Caldwell G, Kamen G, Whittlesey S. Ed: Research Methods in Biomechanics. Human Kinetics, 222-225; 2004

Kadaba MP, Ramakrishnan HK, Wootten ME. Measurement of lower extremity kinematics during level walking. J Orthopaed Res, 1990; 8: 383-392

Novacheck TF. The biomechanics of running. Gait and Posture, 1998; 7: 77-95

Paul S, Miller W, Bottoms L, Beasley P Epee Fencing: A Step-By-Step Guide to Achieving Olympic Gold with No Guarantee You'll Get Anywhere Near it. Wellard Publishing, UK, 50-74; 2011

Schache AG, Wrigley TV, Blanch PD, Star R, Rath DA, Bennell KL. The effect of differing Cardan angle sequences on three dimensional lumbo-pelvic angular kinematics during running. Med Eng and Phys, 2001; 23: 493-501

Sinclair J, Taylor PJ, Edmundson CJ, Brooks D, Hobbs SJ. Influence of the helical and six available Cardan sequences on 3-D ankle joint kinematic parameters. Sports Biomech, 2012; 11: 430-437

Thewlis D, Richards J, Hobbs SJ. The appropriateness of methods used to calculate joint kinematics. JBiomech, 2008; 41: S320

Woltring H, Huiskes R, De Lange A, Veldpaus F. Finite centroid and helical axis estimation from noisy human landmark measurements in the study of human joint kinematics. J Biomech, 1985; 18: 379-389

Wu G, Cavanagh PR. ISB recommendations for standardization in the reporting of kinematic data. J Biomech, 1995; 28: 1257-1261

Journal of Human Kinetics

The Journal of Academy of Physical Education in Katowice

Journal Information


IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 1.174
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.634

CiteScore 2017: 1.31

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.516
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.906

Cited By

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 122 122 13
PDF Downloads 42 42 3