Anthropometric Profile of Male Amateur vs Professional Formula Windsurfs Competing at the 2007 European Championship

Open access

Anthropometric Profile of Male Amateur vs Professional Formula Windsurfs Competing at the 2007 European Championship

This study aimed to describe the current anthropometric profile of Formula Windsurf competitors during the 2007 European Championships and establish a set of reference values useful for future investigations on player selection, talent identification, and training programme development. Fourty-five male participants (mean age 30±9.77 years; body height 182.04±6.3 cm; body mass 81.67±7.35 kg) were selected for the anthropometric profile, including 15 which the International Windsurf Association had defined as professionals. The anthropometric profiles included measurements of skinfolds, segment lengths, breadths, and girths. Somatotype measurements were also calculated into the equation. The male professional windsurfers had larger length, breadth, and girth measurements than their amateur counterparts. The three somatotype components showed that both groups were predominantly mesomorphic, but the professionals were more ectomorphic than endomorphic, whereas the amateurs were slightly more endomorphic than ectomorphic. The descriptive analysis of the anthropometric data provide relevant information concerning the morphological indicators of competitive success in this sporting discipline.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Ackland T. R. Ong K. B. Kerr D. A. & Ridge B. Morphological characteristics of Olympic sprint canoe and kayak paddlers. J Sci Med Sport 2003; 6: 285-294.

  • Buchanan M. Cunningham P. Dyson R. J. & Hurrion P. D. Electromyographic activity of beating and reaching during simulated boardsaling. J Sport Sci 1996; 14 (2): 131-137.

  • Campillo P. Leszczynski B. Marthe C. & Hespel J. M. Electromyographic analysis on a windsurfing simulator. J Sports Sci & Med 2007; 6: 135-141.

  • Carter J. E. L. & Yuhasz M. S. Skinfolds and body composition of Olympic athletes. In Carter (Ed). Physical Structure of Olympic Athletes. Part II: Kinanthropometry of Olympic Athletes. Karger San Diego Calif. 1984.

  • Carter J. E. L. The Heath-Carter anthropometric somatotype. Instruction manual. San Diego State University San Diego CA 2002.

  • Dyson R. J. Buchanan M. Farrington T. A. & Hurrion P. D. Electromyographic activity during windsurfing on water. J Sport Sci 1996; 14 (2): 125-130.

  • Gualdi-Russo E. & Zaccagni L. Somatotype role and performance in elite volleyball players. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 2001; 2: 256-262.

  • Lee R. C. Wang Z. Heo M. Ross R. Janssen I. & Heymsfield. S. B. Total-body skeletal muscle mass: development and cross-validation of anthropometric prediction models. Am J Clin Nutr 2000; 72: 796-803.

  • Marfell-Jones M. Kinanthropometric assessment. Guidelines for athlete assessment in New Zealand sport. Sport Science New Zealand Wellington New Zeeland 1991.

  • Marfell-Jones M. J. Olds T. Stewart A. D. & Carter L. International Standards for Anthropometric Assessment. International Society for the Advancement of Kinanthropometry (ISAK) Potchefstroom South Africa 2006.

  • Porcella P. Succa V. & Vona G. Windsurfer somatotypes. Anthropol Anz 1992; 50 (4): 327-334.

  • Winner K. Windsurfing. Human kinetics Champaign IL 1995.

  • Withers R. T. Norton K. I. Craig N. P. Hartland M. C. & Venables W. The relative body fat and anthropometric prediction of body density of South Australian females aged 17-35 years. Eur J Appl Physiol 1987; 56 (2): 181-190.

Search
Journal information
Impact Factor


IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 1,414
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1,858

CiteScore 2018: 1.60

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.644
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.941

Metrics
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 117 78 1
PDF Downloads 57 46 1