The Post-Literary Era, Leonardo’s Paradigm From Comparative Cultural Studies to Post-literary Study. Gilles Deleuze and Central-European Thought. Post-literature.

Open access


The idea to write this essay came after I studied, almost in the same period, the works of two major contemporary philosophers: the US-American Michael Heim, known as the best theorist of virtual reality, and the French Gilles Deleuze. At the beginning of the new millennium, I have noticed many challenging transformations in art and literature, influenced by the emerging of the new technologies and the self-transformation that it is currently undergoing. This was the major reason I tried to launch a new concept, post-literarure, in order to describe the complex forms of art in the contemporary culture. The concept of post-literature defines metamorphoses and tensions in the world of contemporary creativity, the co-existence, even merging of fields with autonomous profiles in the past.

In my opinion the changes are so radical and quick that we can already talk about a new cultural paradigm in this post-literary epoch, with so many amazing projects imagined by kinetic and temporary organizations, focused on interdisciplinary work and hybridization, on substitution of confrontation between interfering disciplines by dialogue and cohabitation among them, on interchangeability and virtual textualism.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Bohm D. (1992). Thought as a System. London: Routledge.

  • Chomsky N. (1991). Problems of Knowledge and Freedom. New York: Pantheon Books.

  • Codrescu A. (2001). interview by Lidia Vianu

  • Connor S. (1999). Cultura postmoderna. O introducere in teoriile contemporane. Trad. Mihaela Oniga. Bucuresti: Meridiane Bucuresti.

  • Curci Luca:

  • Deleuze G. Guattari F. (1998). Ce este filosofia?. Trad. Magdalena Marculescu-Cojocea. Targoviste : Editura Pandora.

  • Foarta S. Orizont Timisoara nr. 43 1991.

  • Harvey D. (1990). The Condition of Postmodernity. Cambridge: Blackwell MA&Oxford UK.

  • Heim M. (1993). The Metaphysics of Virtual Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Heim M. (1998). Virtual Realism. Oxford University Press.

  • Kessler J. (2002). “Between Alpha and Omega”. Anthology of the XXIInd World Congress of Poets. Iasi Romania October 2002.

  • Lash S. (1988). “Post-modernism as a Regime for Significations. Theory Culture and Society. 5:2-3.

  • Manolescu I. (1995). “La prose postmoderniste et le textualisme mediatique”. Euresis-cahiers roumains d’etudes litteraires. nr. 1-2.

  • Marino A. (2000). Biografia ideii de literatura. vol. 6. partea IV. Cluj-Napoca : Dacia.

  • Nemoianu V. (1995). “Notes sur l’etat de postmodernite”. Euresis-cahiers roumains d’etudes litteraires nr. 1-2/1. 17-19.

  • Novak M. (1991). Cyberspace: First Steps. edited by Michael Benedikt. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

  • Pfohl S. (1992). Death at the Parasite Cafe: Social Sciences (Fictions) and the Postmodern. Basingstoke and London: Macmillan.

  • Puica G. (2002). “Forta conceptului I”. Obiectiv-Arte. supliment cultural al cotidianului Obiectiv-Vocea Sucevei. Suceava 6 March.

  • Rae L. One Zero One-a magazine-rhizome”

  • Rorty R. (1998). Contingenta ironie si solidaritate. Bucuresti : ALL Bucuresti.

  • Spiridon M. (2002). “Post-modernismul: o batalie cu povestiri”. Observator cultural. Bucuresti nr. 129.

  • Yviet B.

  • Watanabe M. S. (2002). Induction Design. Birkhauser

  • Wittgenstein L. (2001). Tractatus logico-philosophicus. translation by Mircea Dumitru and Mircea Flonta Bucuresti: Humanitas.

Journal information
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 413 283 6
PDF Downloads 183 146 8