The aim of this paper is to analyze in chronological terms the idea for the construction of Morava-Vardar canal and the contemporary geopolitical consequences of this project along with its economic, environmental and social impacts. Through critical readings of different contributions and reports made by scientific community, other institutions and media we have presented the idea in chronological terms from the late years of the 19th century until recent years. Continental geographical position Serbs have, has always been considered as an obstacle for their overall development. Through participation in unsustainable geopolitical formations they have continuously managed to develop any kind of connections to the sea. Even though part of various political entities over the time the effort to reach the direct contact to the sea was not successful. For this reason, Serbs raised idea and developed a project to connect their continental state with the sea through construction of the Morava-Vardar water canal. Except economic and environmental consequences, construction of this canal would have geopolitical implications in Balkan Peninsula known as very unstable geopolitical region.
Crompton, G (2004) “The Tortoise and the Economy’: Inland Waterway Navigation in InternationalEconomic History,” Journal of Transport History 25, no. 2, 1-22.
Cvijić J (1912) Izlazak Srbijena Jadransko More. Glasnik srpskoggeografskog društva 1(2): 192−205.
Cvrtila V (2004) Politička geografija I geopoltika. Sveučilisteu Zagrebu, Fakultet političkih znanosti, Zagreb.
Corres A (2014) The Vardar – Morava – Danube link, Hellenic Institute of Marine Technology, Piraeus.
De P (2006) Trade, Infrastructure and Transaction Costs: The Imperatives for Asian Economic Cooperation. Journal of Economic Integration 21(4): 708−735.
Dimitirijević D (2017) Chinese investments in Serbia – a joint pledge for the future of the New Silk Road. Baltic Journal of European Studies 7(1): 64−83.
Disco C (2011) From Sea to Shining Sea: “Making Ends Meet on the Rhine and the Rhone”. In: Badenoch A, Fickers A (eds) Materializing Europe: Transnational Infrastructures and the Project of Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, pp. 353−397.
Dunčić D (2013) Corridor Danube, Morava, Vardar, Aegean see initiative, Ministry of Natural Resources, Minning and Spatial Planning, Belgrade.
Dunčić D, Lukić J (2013) The project to construct the Danub-Morava-Vardar-Aegean Canal, Danubius, Belgrade.
Dujić I (2009) Corridor X – the challenge for Serbia’s strategy Toward the Mediterranean Sea and the Suez Canal. Medjunarodni Problemi 61(1−2): 74−91.
Ejupi A (2017) Functional transformation of Albanian and Serb settlements in Presheva Valley, Serbia. Environmental and Socio-Economic Studies 5(2): 1−9.
Ejupi A, Ramadani I (2016) Regional differentiantion and the geopolitical and transboundary position of the Presheva Valley. Miscellanea Geographica Polonica 20: 22−28.
Faye LM, McArthur JW, Sachs JD, Snow T (2004) Challenges of land locked developing countries. Journal on Human Development 5(1): 31−68.
Grigoriou C (2007) Landlockedness, infrastructure and trade: new estimates for central Asian countries. Policy Research Working Paper Series 4335, The World Bank.
Grčić M (2000) Politička Geografija, Univerzitet u Beogradu, Geografski Fakultet, Beograd.
Janač J (2013) European coastsofBohemia: Negotiating the Danube-Oder-Elbe Cannal in the Troubled Twentieth Century, Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam.
Janáč J, Vleuten E (2016) Transnational system building across geopolitical shifts: The Danube-Oder-Elbe canal, 1901-1915. Water Alternatives 9(2): 271−291.
Obertries J, Moss T, Mollinga P, Bichsel Ch (2016) Water, Infrastructure and Political Rule: Introduction to the Special Issue, Water Alternatives 9(2): 168-181.
Radovanović M (1983) Prostorne determinate i faktori demografskog razvitka u Srbiji, Statističar, br. 10, Beograd.
Šoškić S, Đekić Z, Kresojević M (2014) Analysis of River – Sea Transport in the Direction of the Danube – Black Sea and the Danube Rhine River River Main. International Journal on Marine Water and Safety of Sea Transportation 8(4): 523−531.