The aim of this paper is to provide a geographical urban policy perspective on the strategy of Smart Cities in the specific context of Czechia. Considering that the implementation of the Smart Cities (SC) concept is still relatively young in Czechia, it is highly relevant to examine the time-space diffusion of this concept in Czechia in the geographical lens: where the first initiative to build a smart city started, when the process was started and by whom; in other words, to provide basic empirical evidence of understanding the policy mobility and implementation of smart city policy into the urban development strategies. In the first of our approach, we evaluate the implementation of the term “smart city” in strategic city documents. The next step is the analysis of the strategic urban (city) and smart city documents by distinguishing conceptually distinct pillars of the SC concept and an overview of actors and policy-makers who initiate and support individual pillars of the concept of SC in Czechia. The results of the analysis highlight the differences between the implemented SC topics into city strategies which are caused by fragmented policy mobility, its modifications and influence of key actors who have found the opportunity to participate in policy-making processes at the certain spatial level.
Albino V, Berardi U, Dangelico RM (2015) Smart cities: Definitions, Dimensions, Performance and Initiatives. Journal of Urban Technology 22: 3−21.
Anthopoulos L, Janssen M, Weerakkody V (2016) A Unified Smart City Model (USCM) for smart city Conceptualization and Benchmarking. International Journal of Electronic Government Research 12(2): 77−93.
Barthel S, Colding J (2017) An urban ecology critique on the Smart City model. Journal of Cleaner Production 164: 95−101.
Clarke N (2012) Urban policy mobility, anti-politics, and histories of the transnational municipal movement. Progress in Human Geography 36(1): 25−43.
Giffinger R, Fertner C, Kramar H, Kalasek R, Pichler-Milanović N, Meijers E (2007) Smart cities - Ranking of European mediumsized cities, Vienna University of Technology. Vienna.
Hollands RG (2008) Will the real smart city please stand up? City 12(3): 303−320.
Kitchin R (2014) The real-time city? Big data and smart urbanism. GeoJournal 79(1): 1−14.
Kitchin R, Coletta C, Evans L, Heaphy L, Mac Donncha D (2017) Smart cities, urban technocrats, epistemic communities and advocacy coalitions. The Programmable City Working Paper 26: 1−22.
Lombardi PL, Vanolo A (2015) Smart City as a Mobile Technology: Critical Perspectives on Urban Development Policies. Transforming City Governments for Successful Smart Cities. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp. 147−161.
Peck J, Theodore N (2010) Mobilizing policy: Models, methods, and mutations. Geoforum 41: 169−174.
Pereira GV, Cunha MA, Lampoltshammer TJ, Parycek P, Testa MG (2017) Increasing collaboration and participation in smart city governance: a cross-case analysis of smart city initiatives. Information Technology for Development 23: 526−553.
Pozdniakova AM (2018) Smart City Strategies London-Stockholm-Vienna-Kyiv: In search of common ground and best practices. Acta Innovations 27: 31−45.
Russo F, Rindone C, Panuccio P (2014) The process of smart city definition at an EU level. In: Sustainable City 9: 979−989.
Shelton T, Zook M, Wiig A (2014) The ‘actually existing smart city. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 8: 13−25.
Schäfer M, Wendort G, Keppler D, Hempel L (2017) Smart City: Zur Bedeutung des aktuellen Diskurses für die Arbeit am Zentrum Technik und Gesellschaft, Unpublished. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.31614.38721.
Smigiel C (2018) Urban political strategies in time of crisis: A multiscalar perspective on smart cities in Italy. European Urban and Regional Studies, 2018 : 1−13.
Temenos C, McCann E (2013) Geographies of Policy Mobilities. Geography Compass 7: 344−357.
Vanolo A (2014) Smartmentality: The Smart City as Disciplinary Strategy. Urban Studies, 2014 : 51: 883−898.
Wiig A (2015) IBM’s smart city as techno-utopian policy mobility. City 19: 258−273.