Transboundary spatial planning axes: Discontinuities and suggestions for harmonisation in the Elbe/Labe Euroregion

Open access


Spatial planning axes are an important instrument of spatial planning to help connect urban areas and ensure the accessibility of rural areas and their development. The planning of such axes can steer population and traffic flows, decisions on the locations of economic developments as well as infrastructures such as cable networks. In this paper, current spatial planning axes and their continuity are analysed regarding their suitability to promote sustainable cross-border European development. Two neighbouring regions are investigated as examples, namely the Regional Planning Authority Oberes Elbtal/Osterzgebirge (Germany, Saxony) and the Ústí nad Labem Region (Czechia). The overarching research question is how transboundary spatial planning axes can be harmonised? This can be broken down into the following three sub-questions: (1) Which differences exist between the Saxon and Czech planning systems? (2) How is the need for harmonisation assessed by planning practitioners? (3) Which transboundary recommendations can be given from a scientific perspective? To answer these research questions, expert interviews were conducted with relevant stakeholders from spatial planning authorities as well as scientific and political institutions.

Act on regional development support (Zákon o podpoře regionálního rozvoje), No. 248/2000 Sb.

Albrechts L, Coppens T (2003) Megacorridors: striking a balance between the space of flows and the space of places. Journal of Transport Geography 11(3): 215−224.

Albrechts L, Tasan-Kok T (2009) Corridor and axis development. In: International Encyclopedia of Human Geography: Vol. 2. Elsevier, Oxford, pp. 298−304.

Baugesetzbuch (BauGB) as amended and promulgated on 23 September 2004 (BGBl. I p. 2414), last amended by Law of 20 July 2017 (BGBl. I p. 2808).

Blažek J, Netrdová P (2009) Can development axes be identified by socio-economic variables? The case of Czechia. Geografie 114: 245−262.

Blažek J, Uhlíř D (2011) Teorie regionálního rozvoje: nástin, kritika, implikace. Karolinum, Praha.

Boudeville J R (1966) Problems of regional economic planning. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.

Building Act (Zákon o územním plánování a stavebním řádu) of 14 March 2006, No. 183/2006 Sb.

Chapman D, Pratt D, Larkham P, Dickins I (2003) Concepts and definitions of corridors: evidence from England’s Mid-lands. Journal of Transport Geography 11(3): 179−191.

Christaller W (1933) Die zentralen Orte in Süddeutschland. Eine ökonomisch-geographische Untersuchung über die Gesetzmäßigkeit der Verbreitung und Entwicklung der Siedlungen mit städtischer Funktion. Jena.

Friedmann J (1966) Regional economic policy: a case study of Venezuela. MIT, Cambridge (MA).

Gesetz zur Raumordnung und Landesplanung des Freistaates Sachsen (Landesplanungsgesetz - SächsLPlG) of 11 June 2010 (SächsGVBl. p. 174), last amended by law of 13 December 2016 (SächsGVBl. p. 652).

Geyer HS (1987) The development axis as a development instrument in the Southern African development area. De-velopment Southern Africa 4: 271−300.

Hilhorst JGM (1973) Development axes and the diffusion of innovation. Inaugural paper at the Institute of Social Stud-ies, Hague.

Kistenmacher H (2005) Achsenkonzepte. In: Ritter EH (ed) Handwörterbuch der Raumordnung. Akademie für Raumforschung und Landesplanung, Hannover, pp. 18-25.

Murray A (2009) Location theory. In: Kitchin R, Thrift N (eds) International Encyclopedia of Human Geography. Elsevier, Oxford, pp. 270−276.

Ortner A, Albrecht J, Bartel S, Hruška V, Rybová K (2018) Untersuchung der Passfähigkeit der grenzüberschreitenden Achsen in der Euroregion Elbe/Labe − Výzkum návaznosti přeshraničních rozvojových os v Euroregionu Elbe/Labe. Ústi nad Labem.

Parr JB (1999a) Growth-pole strategies in regional economic planning: A retrospective view: Part 1. Origins and advocacy. Urban Studies 36(7): 1195−1215.

Parr JB (1999b) Growth-pole strategies in regional economic planning: a retrospective view: part 2. Implementation and outcome. Urban Studies 36(8): 1247−1268.

Perroux F (1950) Note sure la notion de pôle de croissance. Économie Appliquee 7: 307−320.

Pottier P (1963) Axes de communication et développement économique. Revue économique 14: 58−132.

Principles of spatial planning (ZÚR, Zásady územního rozvoje), 2011.

Priemus H, Zonneveld W (2003) What are corridors and what are the issues? Introduction to special issue: the governance of corridors. Journal of Transport Geography 11(3): 167−177.

Raumordnungsgesetz (ROG) of 22 December 2008 (BGBl. I p. 2986), last amended by Law of 20 July 2017 (BGBl. I p. 2808).

Spatial Development Policy (PÚR, Politika územního rozvoje ČR), 2015.

SMI – Sächsisches Staatsministerium des Innern - et al. (2016). CROSSDATA: Raumplanung im Freistaat Sachsen und der Tschechischen Republik. First revised version July 2016. Dresden.

Witte PA (2014) The corridor chronicles. Integrated perspectives on European transport corridor development. Doc-toral dissertation, Eburon Academic Publishers.

Witte PA, Spit T (2016) Challenges for corridors: Future perspectives on European corridor development. In: Integrated spatial and transport infrastructure development. Springer, Cham, pp. 99−114.

Zamrazilová E (2007) Přímé zahraniční investice v české ekonomice: rizika duality a role trhu práce. Politická ekonomie 5: 579−602. Ženka J, Pavlík A, Slach O (2017) Resilience of metropolitan, urban and rural regions: a Central European perspective. Geoscape 11(1): 25–40.


The Journal of Jan Evangelista Purkyne University in Ústí nad Labem

Journal Information


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 71 71 25
PDF Downloads 61 61 22