Semiotic evaluation of Lithuania military air navigation charts

Open access

Abstract

Research of semiotic aspects Lithuanian military air navigation charts was based on the semantic, graphic and information load analysis. The aim of semantic analysis was to determine how the conventional cartographical symbols, used in air navigation charts, correspond with carto-linguistic and carto-semiotic requirements. The analysis of all the markings was performed complex and collected by questionnaire were interviewed various respondents: pilots, cartographers and other chart users.

The researches seek two aims: evaluate information and graphical load of military air navigation charts. Information load evaluated to calculate all objects and phenomenon, which was in 25 cm² of map. Charts analysis showed that in low flight charts (LFC) average information load are 4 - 5 times richer than in the operational maps. Map signs optimization on LFC has to be managed very carefully, choosing signs that can reduce the load of information and helps for the information transfer process. Graphical load of maps evaluated of aeronautical maps is not great (5 - 12%) and does not require reduction the information load and generalization of charts. Air navigation charts analysis pointed that not all air navigation sings correspond carto-semiotic requirements and must be improved. The authors suggested some new sings for military air navigation chart, which are simpler, equivalent to human psychophysical perception criteria, creates faster communication and less load on the chart.

Dumbliauskienė, M. (2002). Fundaments of Cartographic Comunacation. Vilnius: Vilnius University Press (in Lithuanian).

Dumbliauskienė, M. & Bautrėnas A. (2005). Colour perception and recovery study in cartographic design. Geografi ja 41(2): 42-50 (in Lithuanian).

Dumbliauskienė M., Ročiūtė I. (2009). Semiotic aspects of signs system in economical maps of school atlases. Geodesy and Cartography. 35 (4): 144-151.

Ratajski L. (1973) The research structure of theoretical cartography. International Yearbook of Cartography, Vol. XIII, p. 219 -224.L.

Ratajski L. (1989). Metodyka kartografi i społeczno-gospodarczej. Warszawa. PPWK.

Sobczyński, E., Pietruszka J. (2004). Mapy lotnicze (przewodnik). Warzsawa: Ministerstwo Obrony Narodowej, Sztab Generalny Wojska Polskiego.

Sobczyński, E., Pietruszka J. (2002). Wojskowe mapy lotnicze (przewodnik). Warszawa: Ministerstwo Obrony Narodowej, Sztab Generalny Wojska Polskiego.

Sobczyński, E., Tomaszewski Z., Sielecki J., (2000). Polskie wojskowe mapy w standardach NATO (przewodnik). Warsawa: Ministerstwo Obrony Narodowej, Sztab Generalny Wojska Polskiego. 1518/2000. 137 p.

STANAG. (1989). 2215 IGEO. Evaluation of land maps, aeronautical charts and digital topographic data. http://www.spatial-accuracy.org/system/files/Afonso2006accuracy.pdf

STANAG. (1993). 3408 IGEO. Position reference system for aeronautical charts.

STANAG. (1972). 3409. MC. Projection for aeronautical charts.

STANAG (1989). 3412 IGEO. Aeronautical information on aeronautical charts.

STANAG. (1989). 3591 IGEO. Criteria for maximum elevation fi gure for aeronautical charts.

STANAG. (1979). 3600 IGEO. Topographic Land Maps, Aeronautical Charts 1:250 000 for Joint Operations.

STANAG. (1987). 3676 IGEO. Marginal information on land maps, aeronautical charts and photomaps.

STANAG. (1986). 3677 IGEO. Standard scales for land maps and aeronautical charts.

STANAG. (1998). 7164 IGEO. Special Aeronautical Charts.

Geodesy and Cartography

The Journal of Committee on Geodesy of Polish Academy of Sciences

Journal Information

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 188 135 10
PDF Downloads 79 58 6