Background: A low Apgar score at 5 minutes has been shown to be a risk factor for development of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP).
Aim: To examine the prognostic value of Apgar score at 5 minutes for development and progression of ROP.
Materials and methods: The study included 132 preterm infants who were screened from 4th week of life onward. Of these, 118 newborns were given Apgar score at 5 minutes. The prognostic significance of this index was studied as an absolute value and as a value ≤ 6. The patients were divided into two groups: group I had no evidence of ROP (n=82) and group II had some signs of ROP (n = 36). Group II was further divided into group IIA - spontaneously regressed cases (n=22), and group IIB with cases which progressed to treatment stages (n=14). We investigated 15 maternal and 20 newborn presumable risk factors for development and progression of ROP. Mann-Whitney U test, χ2 or Fisher’s exact test were used in the statistical analysis. Logistic regression was performed to find significant and independent risk factors for manifestation and progression of ROP.
Results: A low 5-minute Apgar score and an Apgar score of 6 or less at 5 minutes were not statistically significant risk factors of ROP (р=0.191, р=0.191, respectively), but were significant risk factors for the manifested ROP to progress to stages requiring treatment (p=0.046, р=0.036, respectively).
Conclusion: An Apgar score at 5 minutes of 6 or less was a significant and independent risk factor for progression of ROP to stages requiring treatment.
If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.
1. Quinn GE, Gilbert C, Darlow BA, et al. Retinopathy of prematurity: an epidemic of the making. Chin Med J (Engl) 2010;123(20):2929-37.
2. Gilbert C. Retinopathy of prematurity: a global perspective of the epidemics, population of babies at risk and implications for control. Early Hum Dev 2008;84(2):77-82.
3. Gilbert C, Fielder A, Gordillo L, et al. Characteristics of infants with severe retinopathy of prematurity in countries with low, moderate, and high levels of development: implications for screening programs. Pediatrics 2005;115(5):e518-e525.
4. Gui-Shuang Y, Graham EQ, Kelly CW, et al. Predictors for development of referral-warranted retinopathy of prematurity in the telemedicine approaches to evaluating acute-phase retinopathy of prematurity (e-ROP) study. JAMA Ophthalmol 2015;133(3):304-11.
5. Eckert GU, Fortes Filho JB, Maia M, et al. A predictive score for retinopathy of prematurity in very low birth weight preterm infants. Eye 2012(26):400-6.
6. Binenbaum G, Ying GS, Quinn GE, et al. The CHOP postnatal weight gain, birth weight, and gestational age retinopathy of prematurity risk model. Arch Ophthalmol 2012;130(12):1560-5.
7. Binenbaum G, Ying GS, Quinn GE, et al. Premature infants in need of transfusion study group. A clinical prediction model to stratify retinopathy of prematurity risk using postnatal weight gain. Pediatrics 2011;127(3):e607-e614.
8. Ke XY, JU RH, Zhang JQ, et al. Risk factors for severe retinopathy of prematurity in premature infants: a single center study. J South Med Univ 2011;31(12):1963-7.
9. Motta MM, Fortes Filho JB, Coblentz J, et al. Multiple pregnancies and its relationship with the development of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). Clinical Ophthalmology 2011;5:1783-7.
10. Yang CY, Lien R, Yang PH, et al. Analysis of incidence of risk factors of retinopathy of prematurity among very-low-birth-weight infants in North Taiwan. Pediatrics and neonatology 2011;52:321-6.
11. Fortes Filho JB, Eckert GU, Valiatti FB, et al. The influence of gestational age on the dynamic behavior of other risk factors associated with retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2010;248(6):893-900.
12. Garcia-Serrano JL, Ramirez-Garcia MC, Pinar- Molina R. Retinopathy of prematurity in multiple births: risk analysis for plus disease. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol 2009;84:191-8.
13. Fortes Filho JB, Dill JC, Ishizaki A, et al. Score for neonatal acute physiology and perinatal extension II as a predictor for retinopathy of prematurity: study in 304 very-low-birth-weight preterm infants. Ophthalmologica 2009;223:177-82.
14. Hagadorn JI, Richardson DK, Schmid CH, et al. Cumulative illness severity and progression from moderate to severe retinopathy of prematurity. Journal of Perinatology 2007;27:502-9.
15. Akkoyun I, Oto S, Yilmaz G, et al. Risk factors in development of mild and severe retinopathy of prematurity. J AAPOS 2006;10:449-53.
16. Yang MB, Donovan EF, Wagge JR. Race, gender, and clinical risk index for babies (CRIB) score as predictors of severe retinopathy of prematurity. J AAPOS 2006;10:253-61.
17. Karna P, Muttineni J, Angel L, et al. Retinopathy of prematurity and risk factors: a prospective cohort study. BMC Pediatrics 2005;5:18: Available at http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2431/5/18.
18. Slancheva B, Vakrilova L, Emilova Z, et al. Retinopathy of prematurity - incidence and risk factors. Obstetrics and gynecology 2002;41:10-4. [Bulgarian]
19. Cvetkova S, Chernookova V, Kontrova E, et al. [Retinopathy of prematurity. Retinopathy-related risk factors. Screening.] Obstetrics and gynecology; 2000:39:9-12. [Bulgarian]
20. National Conference of retinopathy of prematurity. International participation - Screening and treatment programme. July, 20-22, 2009, Varna, Bulgaria.
21. International committee for the classifi cation of retinopathy of prematurity. The international classification of retinopathy of prematurity revisited. Arch Ophthalmol 2005;123:991-9.
22. Qui X, Lee SK, Tan K, et al. Comparison of singleton and multiple-birth outcomes of infants born before 32 weeks of gestation. Obstet Gynecol 2008;111:365-71.
23. The committee for the classifi cation of retinopathy of prematurity. An international classifi cation of retinopathy of prematurity. Arch Ophthalmol 1984;102(8):1130-4.