Influence of Information Technology on Organization Strategy

Open access


The exponential development of information technology has presented many opportunities to organizations; however, it has also presented several challenges. A key challenge is how do organizations effectively use information technology and incorporate it into their strategies to make full use of its capabilities as an enabler. The fast-changing nature of information technology has resulted in little empirical evidence on how it influences organization strategy. The Strategic Alignment Model was a popular model created to assist organizations to align their information technology and their business strategy; however, the growth of technology may have made this model irrelevant in this age. Therefore, organizations need to determine what factors drive this alignment. Using hermeneutic phenomenology, 12 in-depth interviews were conducted within IBM South Africa to determine real-life drivers that help create this alignment. The themes derived from the interview texts reveal that consumers are becoming more empowered; therefore, organizations need to be more flexible in their business models and strategies. Furthermore, the integration of cross-functional roles in the organization at the management level allow for improved alignment between information technology and strategy as better integrated roles bring a combination of these two elements.

[1] Adner, R. and Levinthal, D.A., 2002. The Emergence of Emerging Technologies. California Management Review, 58, pp.50-66.

[2] Ajjawi, R. and Higgs, J., 2007. Using Hermeneutic Phenomenology to Investigate How Experienced Practitioners Learn to Communicate Clinical Reasoning. The qualitative report, 12, pp.612-638.

[3] Boell, S.K. and Cecez-Kecmanovic, D., 2010. Literature Reviews and the Hermeneutic Circle. Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 41, pp.129-144.

[4] Bontekoe, R., 1996. Dimensions of the Hermeneutic Circle. Atlantic Highlands, N.J, Humanities Press.

[5] Chou, F.K., Wang, E.T. and Yang, F., 2015. Realizing IT Strategic Alignment and Business Performance: An Integration of Three Perspectives. Journal of Information Technology, 30, pp.101-118.

[6] Cohen, L., Manion, L. and Morrison, K., 2000. Research Methods in Education. Teaching in Higher Education, 41, pp.45-67.

[7] Coltman, T.R., Tallon, P.P., Sharma, R. and Queiroz, M., 2015. Strategic IT Alignment: Twenty-five Years on. Journal of Information Technology, 30, pp.91-100.

[8] Cuenca, L., Boza, A., Bas, Á.O. and Trienekens, J.J., 2014. Business-IT Alignment and Service Oriented Architecture-A Proposal of a Service Oriented Strategic Alignment Model. International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, Porto, Portugal, pp.490-495.

[9] De Haes, S. and Van Grembergen, W., 2015. Enterprise Governance of IT, Alignment and Value. Enterprise Governance of Information Technology. Springer.

[10] Dennis, D. and Walsh, F., 2015. Align Business Strategy with Information Technology. Guidelines of IT Management, 23, pp.1-16.

[11] Englander, M., 2012. The interview: Data Collection in Descriptive Phenomenological Human Scientific Research. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 43, pp.13-35.

[12] Goepp, V. and Avila, O., 2015. An Extended-Strategic Alignment Model for Technical Information System Alignment. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 10, pp.1-16.

[13] Heikkila, J., Heikkila, M. and Bouwman, W., 2015. Business Modelling Agility: Turning Ideas into Business. Bled eConference, Bled, Slovenia. AIS, pp.109-124.

[14] Horlacher, A. and Hess, T., 2016. What Does a Chief Digital Officer Do? Managerial Tasks and Roles of a New C-Level Position in the Context of Digital Transformation. 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), IEEE, pp.5126-5135.

[15] Kafle, N.P., 2013. Hermeneutic Phenomenological Research Method Simplified. Bodhi: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 5, pp.181-200.

[16] Kakkonen, M.-L. 2006. Intuition and Entrepreneurs: A Phenomenological Study of Managerial Intuition of Finnish Family Entrepreneurs. Masters, University of Jyvaskyla.

[17] Kappelman, L., Mclean, E., Johnson, V. and Gerhart, N., 2014. The 2014 SIM IT Key Issues and Trends Study. MIS Quarterly Executive, 13, pp.237-263.

[18] Kart, L. and Heudecker, N., 2015. Survey Analysis: Practical Challenges Mount as Big Data Moves to Mainstream. In: GARTNER (ed.). Stamford: Gartner.

[19] Khan, S.H., 2014. Phenomenography: a Qualitative Research Methodology in Bangladesh. International Journal on New Trends in Education and their Implication, 5, pp.34-43.

[20] Khatri, N. and Ng, H.A., 2000. The Role of Intuition in Strategic Decision Making. Human relations, 53, pp.57-86.

[21] Kvale, S., 1994. Ten Standard Objections to Qualitative Research Interviews. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 25, pp.147-173.

[22] Langdridge, D., 2007. Phenomenological Psychology: Theory, Research and Method. United Kingdom, Pearson Education.

[23] Laverty, S.M., 2003. Hermeneutic Phenomenology and Phenomenology: A Comparison of Historical and Methodological Considerations. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2, pp.21-35.

[24] Luftman, J., 2015. Strategic Alignment Maturity. Handbook on Business Process Management 2. Springer.

[25] Mangematin, V. and Baden-Fuller, C., 2015. Introduction: Business Models and Modelling Business Models. Advances in Strategic Management, 33, pp.11-25.

[26] Palinkas, L.A., Horwitz, S.M., Green, C.A., Wisdom, J.P., Duan, N. and Hoagwood, K., 2015. Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42, pp.533-544.

[27] Preston, R., 2014. CIO worries: Security, talent and (sadly) ‘alignment’. IT Leadership. Information Week.

[28] Ramrathan, D. and Sibanda, M., 2015. Does Information Technology Spend Impact On Company Performance? Evidence From Accounting And Market-Based Measures. International Business & Economics Research Journal (IBER), 14, pp.343-354.

[29] Sahal, D., 1981. Alternative Conceptions of Technology. Research Policy, 10, pp.2-24.

[30] Spence, D., 2016. Supervising for Robust Hermeneutic Phenomenology: Reflexive Engagement Within Horizons of Understanding. Qualitative Health Research, 10, pp.971-980.

[31] Stenfors‐Hayes, T., Hult, H. and Dahlgren, M.A., 2013. A Phenomenographic Approach to Research in Medical Education. Medical Education, 47, pp.261-270.

[32] Trigwell, K., 2000. A Phenomenographic Interview on Phenomenography. Journal of Phenomenography, 5, pp.62-82.

[33] Vandermerwe, S., 2014. Gather and Sustain Momentum. Breaking Through. Springer.

[34] Vogt, H., 2015. Making Change: Mobile Pay in Africa. [online] Wall Street Journal. Available: [Accessed 03 August 2016].

[35] Wallsten, S., 2015. The Competitive Effects of the Sharing Economy: How is Uber Changing Taxis? New York: Technology Policy Institute.

[36] Wu, L. and Chiu, M.-L., 2015. Organizational Applications of IT Innovation and Firm's Competitive Performance: A Resource-Based View and the Innovation Diffusion Approach. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 35, pp.25-44.

Foundations of Management

The Journal of Warsaw University of Technology

Journal Information

CiteScore 2017: 0.28

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.198
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.159


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 2238 2238 424
PDF Downloads 1378 1378 309