Do Strategic Alliances, Acquisitions, and R&D Investments Act as Complements or Substitutes?

Open access

Abstract

This paper studies possible complementarities and substitution effects between such strategic choices as alliances, acquisitions and internal R&D investments. The findings indicate that a firm’s absorptive capacity affects the presence of complementarities and substitution effects among those strategic choices. Firms with high absorptive capacity exhibit substitution effects between alliances and acquisitions and between alliances and internal R&D investments. Firms with high absorptive capacity also exhibit complementarities between acquisitions and additional R&D investments. These results were obtained from panel data of large and medium U.S. companies spanning the years 1998-2009. The results are robust to the use of different measures of performance: profitability, market-to-book value, and sales growth. This paper contributes to our understanding of the role of absorptive capacity for the optimal choice of inter-organizational strategy vs. greater internal R&D investments.

[1] Baum J.A.C., Calabrese T., Silverman B.S., 2000. Don't go it alone: Alliance network composition and startups' performance in Canadian biotechnology. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 21, pp.267-294.

[2] Bergh D.D., 1997. Predicting divestiture of unrelated acquisitions: an integrative model of ex ante conditions. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 18, pp.715-731.

[3] Cassiman B., Veugelers R., 2006. In search of complementarity in innovation strategy: internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition. Management science, Vol. 52, pp.68-82.

[4] Cohen W.M., Levinthal D.A., 1990. Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 35, pp.128-152.

[5] Das S., Sen P.K., Sengupta S., 1998. Impact of strategic alliances on firm valuation. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 41, pp.27-41.

[6] Das T.K., Teng B.-S., 2000. A Resource-Based Theory of Strategic Alliances. Journal of Management, Vol. 26, pp.31-61.

[7] de Leeuw T., Lokshin B., Duysters G., 2014. Returns to alliance portfolio diversity: The relative effects of partner diversity on firm's innovative performance and productivity. Journal of Business Research, Vol. 67, pp.1839-1849.

[8] Dussauge P., Garrette B., Mitchell W., 2004. Asymmetric performance: The market share impact of scale and link alliances in the global auto industry. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 25, pp.701-711.

[9] Dyer J.H., Kale P., Singh H., 2004. When to Ally & When to Acquire. Harvard Business Review, Vol. 82, pp.108-115.

[10] Gulati R., 1995. Does Familiarity Breed Trust? The Implications of Repeated Ties for Contractual Choice in Alliances. The Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 38, pp.85-112.

[11] Gulati R., 1998. Alliances and Networks. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 19, pp.293-317.

[12] Heeley M.B., King D.R., Covin J.G., 2006. Effects of firm R&D investment and environment on acquisition likelihood. Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 43, pp.1513-1535.

[13] Jiang R.J., Tao Q.T., Santoro M.D., 2010. Alliance portfolio diversity and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 31, pp.1136-1144.

[14] Kale P., Dyer J.H., Singh H., 2002. Alliance Capability, Stock Market Response, and Long-Term Alliance Success: The Role of the Alliance Function. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 23, pp.747-767.

[15] Kale P., Singh H., 2007. Building firm capabilities through learning: The role of the alliance learning process in alliance capability and firm-level alliance success. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 28, pp.981-1000.

[16] Khanna T., Gulati R., Nohria N., 1998. The Dynamics of Learning Alliances: Competition, Cooperation, and Relative Scope. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 19, pp.193-210.

[17] King D.R., Slotegraaf R.J., Kesner I., 2008. Performance Implications of Firm Resource Interactions in the Acquisition of R&D-Intensive Firms. Organization Science, Vol. 19, pp.327-340.

[18] Koka B.R., Prescott J.E., 2008. Designing alliance networks: The influence of network position, environmental change, and strategy on firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 29, pp.639-661.

[19] Lahiri N., Narayanan S., 2013. Vertical integration, innovation, and alliance portfolio size: Implications for firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 34, pp.1042-1064.

[20] Lane P.J., Lubatkin M., 1998. Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 19, pp.461-477.

[21] Lavie D., 2006. The competitive advantage of interconnected firms: An extension of the resource-based view. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 31, pp.638-658.

[22] Lavie D., 2007. Alliance portfolios and firm performance: A study of value creation and appropriation in the U.S. software industry. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 28, pp.1187-1212.

[23] Lavie D., Miller S.R., 2008. Alliance portfolio internationalization and firm performance. Organization Science, Vol. 19, pp.623-646.

[24] Lin Z., Yang H., Arya B., 2009. Alliance partners and firm performance: resource complementarity and status association. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 30, pp.921-940.

[25] Mowery D.C., Oxley J.E., Silverman B.S., 1998. Technological overlap and interfirm cooperation: implications for the resource-based view of the firm. Research Policy, Vol. 27, pp.507-523.

[26] Oum T.H., Park J.H., Kim K., Yu C.Y., 2004. The effect of horizontal alliances on firm productivity and profitability: evidence from the global airline industry. Journal of Business Research, Vol. 57, pp.844-853.

[27] Park S.H., Ungson G.R., 2001. Interfirm Rivalry and Managerial Complexity: A Conceptual Framework of Alliance Failure. Organization Science, Vol. 12, pp.37-53.

[28] Reuer J.J., Lahiri N., 2014. Searching for Alliance Partners: Effects of Geographic Distance on the Formation of R&D Collaborations. Organization Science, Vol. 25, pp.283-298.

[29] Singh H., Montgomery C.A., 1987. Corporate acquisition strategies and economic performance. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 8, pp.377-386.

[30] Stettner U., Lavie D., 2014. Ambidexterity under scrutiny: Exploration and exploitation via internal organization, alliances, and acquisitions. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 35, pp.1903-1929.

[31] Stuart T.E., 2000. Interorganizational alliances and the performance of firms: A study of growth and innovation rates in a high-technology industry. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 21, pp.791-811.

[32] Tanriverdi H., 2006. Performance effects of information technology synergies in multibusiness firms. MIS Quarterly, pp.57-77.

[33] Tsai W., 2001. Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 44, pp.996-1004.

[34] Vandaie R., Zaheer A., 2014. Surviving bear hugs: Firm capability, large partner alliances, and growth. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 35, pp.566-577.

[35] Wooldridge J.M., 2010. Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT press

[36] Yamakawa Y., Yang H.B., Lin Z.A., 2011. Exploration versus exploitation in alliance portfolio: Performance implications of organizational, strategic, and environmental fit. Research Policy, Vol. 40, pp.287-296.

[37] Zollo M., Reuer J.J., Singh H., 2002. Interorganizational Routines and Performance in Strategic Alliances. Organization Science, Vol. 13, pp.701-713.

Foundations of Management

The Journal of Warsaw University of Technology

Journal Information


CiteScore 2017: 0.28

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.198
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.159

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 193 193 27
PDF Downloads 77 77 7