The aim of our study was to compare the growth rates of lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta Dougl.) with those of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and Norway spruce (Picea abies L.) in plantations. The experimental plots were established in 1988, 1989 and 1994 in the southern part of the Leningrad region. In 2014, the condition of the plants on those plots was examined and their linear parameters were measured. The comparison of Scots pine with lodgepole pine of the same age growing in similar soil conditions has shown that Scots pine has only an insignificant advantage over lodgepole pine in the growth rate. In the mixes of Norway spruce and lodgepole pine, Norway spruce considerably suppresses the growth of lodgepole pine.
Lodgepole pine has successfully adapted to the climatic conditions of the Leningrad region of Russia, which is easy to see from the well-preserved plantations and their annual bearing. No significant damage because of either diseases or insect pests has been revealed.
It is for the first time that the volume yield of lodgepole pine was determined in 20-to 26-year-old experimental plantations in the Leningrad region of Russia.
Alekseev, V.M. 2009. Silvicultural tests of perspective introduced species in the territory of Novgorod region (in Russian). PhD Dissertation, Saint Peters-burg.
Botenkov, V.P., Panova, V.E. 1997. Introduction of highly productive conifer species in Siberia (in Russian). Lesnoe Khozyaistvo, 5, 44.
Girgidov, D.Ya. 1955. Introduction of arboreal species in the North-West part of the USSR (in Russian). Goslesbumizdat, Moscow–Leningrad.
Girgidov, D.Ya. 1952. The lodgepole pine and the red oak in the North-West regions of the USSR (in Russian). Lesnoe Khozyaistvo, 7, 8–13.
Gurskii, A.V. 1957. The main results of the woody plant introduction in the USSR (in Russian). Moscow-Leningrad: AN SSSR.
Gutiy, L.N., Fedorkov, A.L. 2016 Experimental plantations of lodgepole pine in the Syktyvkar forestry in the Komi republic (in Russian). Lesnoj Zhurnal, 1, 48–54.
Demidova, N.A. 2016. Growth and development of the lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta Loud. var. latifolia S. Wats) in a northern boreal forest (in Russian). Proceedings of the Saint-Petersburg Forestry Research Institute, 2, 45–59.
Drozdov, Yu.I. 2008. Lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta) on test plantations of MSFU (in Russian). Lesnoj Vestnik, 1, 188–192.
Elfving, B., Ericsson, T., Rosvall, O. 2001. The introduction of lodgepole pine for wood production in Sweden – a review. Forest Ecology and Management, 141, 15–29.
Elfving, B., Norgren, O. 1993. Volume yield superiority of lodgepole pine compared to Scots pine in Sweden. Pinus contorta from untamed forests to domesticated crop: Proceedings of the IUFRO Meeting and Frans Kempe Symposium 1992, on Pinus contorta provenances and breeding (ed.: D. Lindgren). Department of Forest Genetics and Plant Physiology, Swedish University of Agricultural Science, Umea. Report 11, 69–80.
Ericsson, T. 1994. Lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta var. latifolia) breeding in Sweden – results and prospects based on early evaluations. Dissertation Sweden University of Agricultural Sciences, Umea.
Fedorkov, A.L., Turkin, A.A. 2010. Test of shore pine in the Republic of Komi (in Russian). Lesovedenie, 1, 70–74.
Feklistov, P.A., Biryukov, S.Yu. 2006. Seasonal growth of shore pine in Northern taiga subzone (in Russian). Lesnoj Zhurnal, 6, 24–29.
Johnstone, J.F., Chapin, F.S. 2003. Non-equilibrium succession dynamics indicate continued northern migration of lodgepole pine. Global Change Biology, 9 (10), 1401–1409.
Kutsevalov, M.A. 1977. Forest cultures of lodgepole pine in the European part of the USSR (in Russian). PhD Dissertation, Leningrad.
Lapin, P.I., Kaluckij, K.G., Kaluckaja, O.N. 1979. Introduction of forest species (in Russian). Lesnaja Promyslennost, Moscow.
Markova, I.A., Zhigunov, A.V. 1999. Silvicultural tests of perspective introduced species in the North-West part of Russia (in Russian). Izv. SPbGLTA, Vol. 165, 20–28.
Methodical recommendations on the study of the forest plantations with introduced species (in Russian). 1984. Vsesoiuz. akad. s.-kh. nauk im. V.A. Lenina, Moscow.
Moiseev, V.S. 1971. Forest valuation of young forest: Textbook (in Russian). Leningrad.
Raevskii, B.V. 1997. Growth and productivity of the lodgepole pine in the early stages of their ontogenesis (in Russian). Lesnoe Khozyaistvo, 5, 45–47.
Raevskii, B.V. 2015. Selection and seed growing of the Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and the lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta Dougl. ex Loud. var. latifolia Engelm) in the North-West part of the Russian taiga zone (in Russian). DCs Dissertation, Petrozavodsk.
Shirnin, V.K. 1999. Selection for wood quality (by the example of English oak and other species in zernozem soils of Central Russia) (in Russian). PhD dissertation, Voronezh.
Shkutko, N.V. 1970. Conifer exotic species and their significance for economy (in Russian). Nauka i Technika, Minsk.
Sutton, A., Staniforth, R.J., Tardif, J. 2002. Reproductive ecology and allometry of red pine (Pinus resinosa) at the northwestern limit of its distribution range in Manitoba, Canada. Canadian Journal of Botany, 80 (5), 482–493.
Zhigunov, А.V., Маrkоvа, I.А., Bоndаrеnkо, А.S. 2002. Statistical processing of the research materials on forest plantations: Training manual. SPbGLTА, SPbNIILKh, Saint Petersburg.