Rouhani’s and Obama’s Persian New Year messages: A systemic functional grammar perspective

Open access


This study investigated Nowruz (Persian New Year) messages by Presidents Hassan Rouhani and Barack Obama in March 2016. The study critically analyzed the discourse of these two presidential messages and uncovered the hidden aspects of their ideologies, policies, and background worldviews. In doing so, an integrated version of Halliday’s systemic functional grammar (SFG) and critical discourse analysis (CDA) was used. The analysis of data included various linguistic dimensions (e.g. processes, modality, transitivity) of the messages and their statistics. Although results suggested that Obama intended to build a more intimate situation, both presidents tried to inspire a spirit of action, development and effort in their respective governments. The messages did not reveal considerable thematic differences, except some discoursal religious features expressed in Rouhani’s message.

Bayram, Fatih (2010). Ideology and political discourse: A critical discourse analysis of Erdogan’s political speech. Arecls 7: 23-40.

Brown, Gillian, George Yule (1983). Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Coffin, Caroline (2006). English Grammar in Context: Book 3 - Getting Practical (Evaluating Everyday Texts). The Open University.

Fairclough, Isabela, Norman Fairclough (2013). Political Discourse Analysis: A Method for Advanced Students. London: Routledge.

Halliday, Michael (1994). Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.

Halliday, Michael (1970). Functional diversity in language as seen from a consideration of modality and mood in English. Foundations of Language 6(3): 322-361.

Halliday, Michael, Christian Matthiessen (2004). An Introduction to Functional Grammar (3rd edn.). London: Edward Arnold.

Karami, Arash (2014). ‘We’re Worried’ conference against nuclear deal stirs backlash. (last access 01/05/2016).

Karimnia, Amin, Leila Barbareh (2017). Moves, poetic types, poetic schemes, and cultural themes in Iranian obituaries. Journal of Multicultural Discourses 12: 290-305.

Mahdavi, Seyedamir Hossein (2014). Worried or valiant? The dialectic between Iran’s nuclear negotiations and its domestic politics. Middle East Brief, Brandeis University, Crown Center for Middle East Studies 8: 1-8.

O’Halloran, Kieran (2006). English Grammar in Context, Book 2: Getting Inside English. Milton Keynes: The Open University.

Renkema, Jan (2009). Discourse, of Course: An Overview of Research in Discourse Studies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Saragih, Amrin (2010). Introducing Systemic Functional Grammar of English. Medan: FBS UNIMED

Stojičić, Violeta, Nikoleta Momčilović (2016). Verbal derivatives and process types in transitivity configurations of English and German clauses. Linguistics and Literature 14(1): 15-24.

Tavakoli, Mahboobeh, Amin Karimnia (2017). Dominant and gender-specific tendencies in the use of discourse markers: Insights from EFL learners. World Journal of English Language 7(2): 1-9.

Titscher, Stefan, Michael Meyer, Ruth Wodak, Eva Vetter (2000). Methods of Text and Discourse Analysis: In Search of Meaning. UK: Sage Publications.

Wodak, Ruth. (2001). The discourse-historical approach. Wodak, Ruth, Michael Mayer, eds. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage, 63-94.

Yarmohammadi, Lotfollah (2007). ?ertebatat ?æz mænzær-e gofteman shenasi-ye ?enteqadi (Communications from Critical Discourse Perspective). Tehran: Hermes.

Zhuanglin, Hu (1988). A Course of Linguistics. Beijing: Peking University Press.


Explorations in English Language and Linguistics

Journal Information


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 149 149 18
PDF Downloads 68 68 15