Open educational resources (OER) have been identified as having the potential to extend opportunities for learning to non-formal learners. However, little research has been conducted into the impact of OER on non-formal learners. This paper presents the results of a systematic survey of more than 3,000 users of open educational resources (OER). Data was collected between 2013 and 2014 on the demographics, attitudes and behaviours of users of three repositories. Questions included a particular focus on the behaviours of non-formal learners and the relationship between formal and non-formal study. Frequency analysis shows that there are marked differences in patterns of use, user profiles, attitudes towards OER, types of materials used and popularity of different subjects. The experience of using OER is fairly consistent across platforms in terms of satisfaction and impact on future behaviour. On the whole, non-formal learners surveyed were highly positive about their use of OER and believe they will continue to use them. With regards to this making formal study more likely some degree of polarization was observed: some believed formal study was now more likely, while others felt it made this less likely. On the whole, while non-formal learners are enthusiastic about using free and online resources, the language and concept of OER does not seem to be well understood in the groups surveyed. A range of findings relating to OER selection and use as well as differences between repositories are explored in the discussion.
4. Cofer, D. (2000). Non-formal workplace learning: Practice application brief, NO 10. US Department of Education: Clearinghouse on Adult, Career and Vocational Education.
5. Coffield, F., Moseley, D., Hall, E., & Ecclestone, K. (2004). Learning styles and pedagogy in post-16 learning. A systematic and critical review. London: Learning and Skills Research Centre. Retrieved from http://www.lsda.org.uk/files/PDF/1543.pdf
6. Conrad, D., Mackintosh, W., McGreal, R., Murphy, A. & Witthaus, G. (2013). Report on the Assessment and Accreditation of Learners using Open Education Resources (OER). Commonwealth of Learning. Retrieved from http://oasis.col.org/handle/11599/232
10. Emmanuel, E.J. (2013). Online Education: MOOCs taken by educated few. Nature, 503, 342. doi:10.1038/503342a
11. Farrow, R., Pitt, R. de los Arcos, B., Perryman, L-A., Weller, M., & McAndrew, P. (2015). Impact of OER use on teaching and learning: data from OER Research Hub (2013–2014). British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(5), 972–976.
12. Felstead, A., Fuller, A., Unwin, L., Ashton, D., Butler, P., & Lee, T. (2005). Surveying the scene: learning metaphors, survey design and the workplace context. Journal of Education and Work, 18(4), 359–383. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13639080500327857
14. Friesen, N. (2009). Open Educational Resources: New Possibilities for Change and Sustainability. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(5), 1-13.
15. Glover, I., & Latif, F. (2013). Investigating Perceptions and Potential of Open Badges in Formal Higher Education. In J. Herrington, A. Couros & V. Irvine (Eds.), Proceedings of EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology 2013 (pp. 1398-1402). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
18. Hilton, J. (2014). A Review of Research on the Perceptions, Influence and Cost-Savings of OER: Looking Back and Looking Forward. Paper presented at Open Education 2014. Washington D.C., USA 19th November 2014.
22. Järvelä, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2014). Designing for learning: Interest, motivation, and engagement. In D. Keith Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences (2nd ed.), (pp. 668-685). New York: Cambridge University Press.
23. Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
26. Law, P., Perryman, L-A., and Law, A. (2013). Open educational resources for all? Comparing user motivations and characteristics across The Open University’s iTunes U channel and OpenLearn platform. Proceedings of the Open and Flexible Higher Education Conference 2013, 23-25 October 2013, Paris, France, European Association of Distance Teaching Universities (EADTU), 204–219. Retrieved from http://oro.open.ac.uk/39102/1/eadtu%20annual%20conference%202013%20-%20proceedings.pdf
27. Malcolm, J., Hodkinson, P., & Colley, H. (2004) Informality and Formality in Learning: A Summary of the Report to the Learning and Skills Research Centre. London: Learning and Skills Research Centre. Retrieved from https://kar.kent.ac.uk/4647/
28. McAndrew, P., Farrow, R., & Cooper, M. (2012). Adapting online learning resources for all: planning for professionalism in accessibility. Research in Learning Technology, 20(4), 345–361.
30. Miyazoe, T., & Anderson, T. (2013). Interaction Equivalency in an OER, MOOCS and Non-formal Learning Era. Journal of Interactive Media in Education 2013(2), 9. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/2013-09
38. Sangrà, A., & Wheeler, S. (2013). New Non-formal Ways of Learning: Or Are We Formalising the Non-formal? Universities and Knowledge Society Journal (RUSC), 10(1), 286-293. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.7238/rusc.v10i1.1689
39. Schmid, L., Manturuk, K., Simpkins, I., Goldwasser, M., & Whitfield, K. E. (2015). Fulfilling the promise: do MOOCs reach the educationally underserved? Educational Media International, 52(2), 116-128. doi:10.1080/09523987.2015.1053288
40. Sfard, A. (1998). On Two Metaphors for Learning and the Dangers of Choosing Just One. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4-13.
42. Weller, M. (2014). Battle for Open: How openness won and why it doesn't feel like victory. London: Ubiquity Press. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/bam
43. Wiley, D., Hilton, J. Ellington, S., & Hall, T. (2012). A preliminary examination of the cost savings and learning impacts of using open textbooks in middle and high school science classes. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. 13(3), 261-276.