Accessibility of Local Food Production to Regional Markets – Case of Berry Production in Northern Ostrobothnia, Finland

Open access


Consumers and institutional kitchens, as well as traders, have shown increasing interest towards local food. This is particularly due to the transparency and traceability characteristic of a short supply chain and social aspects related to food origins. The trend has been increasingly common during the past decade in Europe and North America, and it is strongly evident in the case area of this study in Northern Ostrobothnia, Finland. In general, ease of access to food is highly important for consumers and crucial for institutional kitchens, in addition to quality aspects and price. However, regardless of proximity, poor accessibility is one of the key issues preventing the further growth of local food markets. Due to scale economics in food value chain, food transport is presently organised mainly by centralised, large-scale logistics companies directed via hubs serving millions of consumers. Accordingly, production volumes required to enter large-scale markets are often unattainable for disjointed small-scale local food producers. In this study, geographic information system (GIS)-based accessibility analyses are applied for analysing potential for integral networking of local food production and transport companies. Berry production was selected as a case study because it has a relatively strong role in Northern Ostrobothnia, while its logistics are notably underdeveloped. Spatial data of primary production volumes consists of register records of farm-specific cultivation areas and average yields in Northern Ostrobothnia and Finland. Accessibility computations are based on the digital model of the Finnish road network, Digiroad. Two surveys were also implemented to farmers and food processing companies to seek views on food processing, sales, logistics and procurements regarding local food. Data from the surveys was used in accessibility analysis, which enables exploration of opportunities for establishing ‘local food’ clusters integrating small producers into a more effective and competitive network. Information about favourable conditions for cooperative networks in the local food sector may help in establishing companies and their growth. Again, successful networking may increase scale economies in local production in transport, processing and marketing.

[1] Baldacci, R., Toth, P. & Vigo, D. (2010). Exact algorithms for routing problems under vehicle capacity constraints. Annals of Operations Research 175(1): 213-245. DOI: 10.1007/s10479-009-0650-0.

[2] Beckie, M., Huddart Kennedy, E. & Wittman, H. (2012). Scaling up alternative food networks: farmers’ markets and the role of clustering in western Canada. Agriculture and Human Values 29(3), 333-345. DOI: 10.1007/s10460-012-9359-9.

[3] Berti, G. & Mulligan, C. (2016). Competitiveness of small farms and innovative food supply chains: The role of food hubs in creating sustainable regional and local food systems. Sustainability 8(7), 616. DOI: 10.3390/su8070616.

[4] Blanquart, C., Gonçalves, A., Vandenbossche, L., Kebir, L., Petit, C. & Traversac, J.-B. (2010). The logistics leverages of short food supply chains performance in terms of sustainability [Author manuscript]. 12th World Conference on Transport Research, Lisbonne, Portugal.

[5] Bloom, J. D. & Hinrichs, C. C. (2011). Moving local food through conventional food system infrastructure: Value chain framework comparisons and insights. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 26 (1), 13-23. DOI: 10.1017/S1742170510000384.

[6] Bosona, T. G. & Gebresenbet, G. (2011). Cluster building and logistics network integration of local food supply chain. Biosystems engineering 108(4), 293-302. DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2011.01.001.

[7] Bosona, T., Nordmark, I., Gebresenbet, G. & Ljungberg, D. (2013). GIS-based analysis of integrated food distribution network in local food supply chain. International Journal of Business and Management 8(17), 13-34. DOI: 10.5539/ijbm.v8n17p13.

[8] Brown, C. (2003). Consumers’ preferences for locally produced food: A study in southeast Missouri. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 18(4), 213-224. DOI: 10.1079/AJAA200353.

[9] Brunori, G., Galli, F., Barjolle, D., van Broekhuizen, R., Colombo, L., Giampietro, M., Kirwan, J., Lang, T., Mathijs, E., Maye, D., de Roest, K., Rougoor, C., Schwarz, J., Schmitt, E., Smith, J., Stojanovic, Z., Tisenkopfs, T. & Touzard, J.-M. (2016). Are Local Food Chains More Sustainable than Global Food Chains? Considerations for Assessment. Sustainability 8(5), 449. DOI: 10.3390/su8050449.

[10] Campbell, J. F. (1996). Hub location and the p-hub median problem. Operations Research, 44(6), 923-935. DOI: 10.1287/opre.44.6.923.

[11] Csapó, J. & Wetzl, V. (2016). Possibilities for the Creation of Beer Routes in Hungary: A Methodological and Practical Perspective. European Countryside 8:3, 250-262. DOI: 10.1515/euco-2016-0018.

[12] Day-Farnsworth, L., MacCown, B., Miller, M. & Pfeiffer, A. (2009). Scaling Up: Meeting the Demand for Local Food. Madison: University of Wisconsin.

[13] Donald, B. (2009). Contested Notions of Quality in a Buyer-Driven Commodity Cluster: The Case of Food and Wine in Canada. European Planning Studies 17(2), 263-280. DOI: 10.1080/09654310802553522.

[14] Edward-Jones, G., Milà i Canals, L., Hounsome, N., Truninger, M., Koerber, G., Hounsome, B., Cross, P., York, E. H., Hospido, A., Plassmann, K., Harris, I. M., Edwards, R. T., Day, G. A. S., Tomos, A. D., Cowell, S. J. & Jones, D. L. (2008). Testing the assertion that ‘local food is best’: the challenges of an evidence-based approach. Trends in Food Science & Technology 19(5), 265-274. DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2008.01.008.

[15] Feldmann, C. & Hamm, U. (2015). Consumers’ perceptions and preferences for local food: A review. Food Quality and Preference, 40/A, 152-164. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.09.014.

[16] Forsman, S. (2004). How do small food-processing forms compete? A Resource-based approach to competitive strategies. Agricultural and Food Science in Finland, 13(Supplement).

[17] Halweil, B. (2002). Home Grown. The Case for Local Food in a Global Market. Washington, DC: Worldwatch Institute.

[18] Harris, E. M. (2010). Eat Local? Constructions of Place in Alternative Food Politics. Geography Compass 4(4), 355-369. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-8198.2009.00298.x.

[19] Miller, H. J. & Shaw, S. L. (2001). Geographic information systems for transportation: principles and applications. Geography Compass 9(4), 180-189. DOI: 10.1111/gec3.12204.

[20] Isoniemi, M., Mäkelä, J., Arvola, A., Forsman-Hugg, S., Lampila, P., Paananen, J. & Roininen, K. (2006). Kuluttajien ja kunnallisten päättäjien näkemyksiä lähi- ja luomuruoasta. Helsinki: Kuluttajatutkimuskeskus.

[21] Järvelä, M., Jokinen, P., Huttunen, S. & Puupponen, A. (2009). Local food and renewable energy as emerging new alternatives of rural sustainability in Finland. European Countryside 1(2), 113-124. DOI: 10.2478/v10091/009-0010-8.

[22] Klose, A. & Drexl, A. (2005). Facility location models for distribution system design. European Journal of Operational Research 162(1), 4-29. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2003.10.031.

[23] Kneafsey, M., Venn, L., Schmutz, U., Balázs, B., Trenchard, L., Eyden-Wood, T., Bos, E., Sutton, G. & Blackett, M. (2013). Short Food Supply Chains and Local Food Systems in the EU. A State of Play of their Socio-Economic Characteristics. Sevilla: European Commission, Joint Research Centre.

[24] Kotavaara, O., Korhonen, K., Miettinen, M., Lehtinen, U., Muilu, T., Juga, J. & Rusanen, J. (2014). Lähi- ja luomuruoan saavutettavuus Pohjois-Pohjanmaalla. Helsinki: MTT.

[25] Kurunmäki, S., Ikäheimo, I., Syväniemi, A.-M. & Rönni, P. (2012). Lähiruokaselvitys. Ehdotus lähiruokaohjelman pohjaksi 2012-2015. Helsinki: Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry.

[26] Lagnevik, M., Sjoholm, I., Lareke. A. & Ostberg, J. (2003). The dynamics of innovation clusters: A study of the food industry. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

[27] Lawson, R., Guthrie, J., Cameron, A. & Fischer, W. C. (2008). Creating value through cooperation: An investigation of farmers’ markets in New Zealand. British Food Journal 110(1), 11-25. DOI: 10.1108/00070700810844768.

[28] Marsden, T., Banks, J. & Bristow, G. (2000). Food supply chain approaches: exploring their role in rural development. Sociologia Ruralis 40(4), 424-438. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9523.00158.

[29] Mononen, T. (2006). Yhteiskuntatieteellisen elintarviketutkimuksen linjoja. In Mononen, T. & Silvasti, T., eds., Ruokakysymys. Näkökulmia yhteiskuntatieteelliseen elintarviketutkimukseen (pp. 26-52). Helsinki: Gaudeamus Kirja / Oy Yliopistokustannus University Press.

[30] Morgan, K. (2008). Greening the realm: sustainable food chains and the public plate. Regional Studies 42(9), 1237-1250. DOI: 10.1080/00343400802195154.

[31] Muilu, T., Jansik, C., Wuori, O. & Lehtonen, O. (2016). Suomen keskittyvä elintarviketeollisuus. Maaseudun uusi aika 3, 39-52.

[32] Nagy, G. & Salhi, S. (2007). Location-routing: Issues, models and methods. European Journal of Operational Research 177(2), 649-672. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2006.04.004.

[33] Norberg-Hodge, H., Merrifield, T. & Gorelick, S. (2002). Bringing the food economy home - Local alternatives to global agribusiness. London: Zed Books.

[34] Páez, A., Scott, D. M. & Morency, C. (2012). Measuring accessibility: positive and normative implementations of various accessibility indicators. Journal of Transport Geography 25, 141-153. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.03.016.

[35] Piilo, T. (2003). Sujuva logistiikka ratkaisee pk-yrityksen menestyksen. Kehittyvä elintarvike 6, 22-23.

[36] Porter, M. (1985). Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. New York NY. The Free Press.

[37] Porter, M. (1998). On competition. New York: HBS.

[38] Puoskari, S., Wuori, O., Korhonen, K. & Muilu, T. (2013). Lähiruoan lisääminen kuntien julkisissa hankinnoissa Kainuussa ja Pohjois-Pohjanmaalla. Helsinki: MTT.

[39] Renting, H., Marsden, T. K. & Banks, J. (2003). Understanding alternative food networks: exploring the role of short food supply chains in rural development. Environment and Planning A 35(3), 393-411. DOI: 10.1068/a3510.

[40] Saito, H. & Saito, Y. (2013). Motivations for Local Food Demand by Japanese Consumers: A Conjoint Analysis with Reference-Point Effects. Agribusiness 29(2), 147-161. DOI: 10.1002/agr.21315.

[41] Seppänen, L., Aro-Heinilä, E., Helenius, J., Hietala-Koivu, R., Ketomäki, H., Mikkola, M., Risku-Norja, H., Sinkkonen, M. & Virtanen, H. (2006). Paikallinen ruokajärjestelmä: ympäristö- ja talousvaikutuksia sekä oppimishaasteita. Helsinki: Helsingin yliopisto.

[42] Spiekermann, K., Wegener, M., Květoň, V., Marada, M., Schürmann, C., Biosca, O., Segul, A. U., Antikainen, H., Kotavaara, O., Rusanen, J., Bielańska, D., Fiorello, D., Komornicki, T., Rosik, P. & Stepniak, M. (2015). TRACC, Transport Accessibility at Regional/Local Scale and Patterns in Europe TRACC Accessibility Indicator Factsheets [Final Report. Vol 4]. Luxembourg: ESPON.

[43] Seyfang, G. (2006). Ecological citizenship and sustainable consumption: Examining local organic food networks. Journal of Rural Studies 22(4), 383-395. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2006.01.003.

[44] Viitaharju, L., Määttä, S., Hakala, O. & Törmä, H. (2014). Työtä ja hyvinvointia! Lähiruoan käytön aluetaloudelliset vaikutukset Suomen maakunnissa. Helsinki: Helsingin Yliopisto.

[45] Virtanen, M., Heikkilä, L. & Eerikäinen, H. (2014). Arvoketju ja liiketoimintamahdollisuuksien kehittäminen. In Heikkilä, L., eds., Ruoka lähellä, kuluttaja kaukana? Näkökulmia lähiruoan kysynnän ja tarjonnan kohtaamiseen (pp. 40-49). Helsinki: MTT.

[46] Vänttinen, R. & Korpi-Vartiainen, J.-P. (2010). Lähiruoan käyttö julkisen sektorin ammattikeittiöissä. Suonenjoki: Sisä-Savon Seutuyhtymän julkaisuja.

[47] Wolfe, D. A. & Gertler, M. S. (2006). Local antecedents and trigger events: Policy implications of path dependency for cluster formation. In Braunerheim, P. & Feldmand, M., eds., Cluster genesis: Technology-based industrial development (pp. 243-263). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

[48] EPRS (2016). Short food supply chains and local food systems in the EU. Briefing September 2016. European Parliamentary Research Service.

[49] ESRI (2010). Algorithms used by Network Analyst

[50] ETL (2016). Forkful of facts - Finnish food industry statistics 2016. Ruokatieto. (EU) No 807/2014

[51] European Commission (2001). Study on the impact of community agricultural policies on economic and social cohesion.

[52] European Commission (2012). National GPP action plans (policies and guidelines).

[53] EUROSTAT (2016).

[54] Finland’s 72nd government (2013). Local Food - But of Course! Government Programme on Local Food and development objectives for the local food sector to 2020. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry.

[55] Green public procurement (2008). Europa, Summaries of EU legislation.

[56] Huomisen ruoka (2010). Esitys kansalliseksi ruokastrategiaksi. Ruokastrategian valmistelun johtoryhmä.

[57] Korhonen, K. & Muilu, T. (2015). Developing local food cooperation and public procurement in Oulu South region, Finland. Proceedings of the conference. Agriculture in an urbanizing society, 14-17 September 2015, Rome, Italy (pp. 527-528).

[58] MTK (Maa- ja metsätaloustuottajain Keskusliitto) (2011). Lähiruoalle määritelmä. 31.5.2011.

[59] Maaseutupolitiikan yhteistyöryhmä (2000). Lähiruoan mahdollisuudet. Lähiruokatyöryhmän loppura portti. Maaseutupolitiikan yhteistyöryhmän julkaisu 6/2000. Sisäministeriön monistamo. Helsinki.

[60] OECD (2014). Competition issues in the food chain industry. The OECD Competition Committee.

[61] Piilo, T. (2007). Food Logistics - Providing local food through individual transport and distribution solutions.

[62] Ruoka-Suomi (2013). Elintarvikeyritykset kokoluokittain 6/2013.

[63] Valtioneuvosto (2010). Valtioneuvoston selonteko ruokapolitiikasta 14.10. 2010.

[64] Valtioneuvosto (2017). Food2030: Finland feeds us and the world. Government report on food policy.

[65] Valtioneuvoston kanslia (2015). Pääministeri Juha Sipilän hallituksen strateginen ohjelma. 29.5.2015.

European Countryside

The Journal of Mendel University in Brno

Journal Information

CiteScore 2017: 0.78

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.265
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.607

Cited By


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 313 313 29
PDF Downloads 152 152 14