Rural Sanctuaries as ‘Smart Destinations’ – Sustainability Concerns (Mazovia Region, Poland)

Open access

Abstract

The general objective of this paper is to present and discuss the factors that need to be taken into account to ensure that the development and management of religious tourism at rural sites was sustainable from an economic, environmental and socio-cultural point of view. Among other issues, sustainable religious tourism means accessibility to the sanctuaries, protection of cultural and heritage values of the local community, benefits for the local residents and meaningful experience for visitors. Authors were especially interested in the less popular, more remotely located holy sites in Mazovia Region (Poland) and two concerns: readiness to respond the needs of persons with different disabilities and local community opinion on tourists. As was documented by our research outcomes despite the recent numerous improvements, the most popular rural sanctuaries in Mazovia Region, remain only partially accessible for persons with disabilities. As masses of pilgrims have a significant effect on wellbeing and everyday life quality of residents (contributing both to positive and to negative effects), those who accept that tourists are important for economic development, benefit from it, creating ‘smart host area’. These rural communities which are not knowledgeable about positive impacts – see only negative consequences.

[1] Adair J. (1978). The Pilgrim’s Way. London: Thames and Hudson.

[2] Alecu, I.C. (2010). Epistemological aspects of religious tourism in rural areas. International Journal of Business, Management and Social Sciences 2(3), 59-65.

[3] Altenberg, K. (2008). Experiencing Landscape. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell International.

[4] Andereck, K., Valentine, K., Knopf, R. & Vogt, Ch. (2005). Residents’ perceptions of community tourism impacts. Annals of Tourism Research 32(4), 1056-1076. DOI: 10.1016/j.annals.2005.03.001.

[5] Archer, B., Cooper, Ch. & Ruhanem, L. (2005). The Positive and Negative Impacts of Tourism (pp. 75-103). In Theobald William F., ed., Global Tourism. New York: Elsevier.

[6] Blackwell, R. (2001). Motivations for Religious Tourism, Pilgrimage, Festivals and Events (pp. 35-47). In Religious Tourism and Pilgrimage Festivals Management. London: CABI Publishing.

[7] Dallen, J. T. & Olsen, D. H. (2009). Tourism, religion and spiritual journeys. London: Routledge.

[8] Dallen, J. T. & Boyd, S., W. (2003). Heritage Tourism. Harlow: Prentice Hall.

[9] Dąbrówka, U. (2004). Sanktuaria na Mazowszu. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Muza.

[10] Finn, M., Elliott-White, M. & Walton, M. (2000). Tourism and Leisure Research Methods. London: Pearson.

[11] Hall, C. M. (2008). Tourism Planning. Prentice Hall: Pearson Education.

[12] Haley, A. J., Snaith, T. & Miller, G. (2005). The social impacts of tourism a case study of Bath, UK. Annals of Tourism Research 32(3), 647-668. DOI: 10.1016/j.annals.2004.10.009.

[13] Hamilton, S. & Spicer, A. (2005). Defining the Holy Site: Sacred Space in Europe. Aldershot: Ashgate.

[14] Horák, M., Kozumplíková, A., Somerlíková, K., Lorencová, H., Lampartová, I. (2015). Religious Tourism in the South – Moravian and Zlin Regions: Proposal for three New Pilgrimage Routs. European Countryside 7(3), 167-178, DOI: 10.1515/euco-2015-0012.

[15] Inskeep, E. (2001). Tourism Planning: An Integrated and Sustainable Development Approach. London: Willey Publishing.

[16] Kryciński, S., Oziebło, A., Przygoda, K., Sobolewska, M. & Wiśniewski, J. (2015). Drewniane skarby Mazowsza. Warszawa: Centrum Duszpasterstwa Archidiecezji Warszawskiej.

[17] Lomine, L. & Edmunds, J. (2007). Key Concepts in Tourism. New York: Palgrave.

[18] Nolan, M. L. & Nolan, S. (1992). Religious Sites as Tourism Attractions in Europe. Annals of Tourism Research 19(1), 68-78. DOI: 10.1016/0160-7383(92)90107-Z.

[19] Nunkoo, R. & Ramkissoon, H. (2011). Developing a community support model for tourism. Annals of Tourism Research 38(3), 964-988. DOI: 10.1016/j.annals.2011.01.017.

[20] Nunkoo, R. & Gursoy, D. (2012). Resident’s support for tourism. Annals of Tourism Research 39(1), 243-268. DOI: 10.1016/j.annals.2011.05.006.

[21] Pawlikowska-Piechotka, A. (2009). Zagospodarowanie turystyczne i rekreacyjne. Gdynia: Novae Res Publishing.

[22] Pawlikowska-Piechotka, A. (2007). Nachaltige Raumentwicklung von Wallfahrsorten (pp. 213-227). In Banse, G. & Kiepas, A. eds., Nachhaltige Entwicklung in Polen und Deutschland (Landwirtschaft – Tourismus – Bildung). Berlin: Edition Sigma.

[23] Phillimore, J. & Goodson, L. (2004). Qualitative Research in Tourism. New York: Routledge.

[24] Rotherham, I. (2009). Sustaining Tourism Infrastructure for Religious Tourists and Pilgrims within the UK (pp. 64-77). In Religious Tourism and Pilgrimage Festivals Management. London: CABI Publishing.

[25] Rinchede, G. (1992). Forms of religious tourism. Annals of Tourism Research 19(1), 51-67.

[26] Rocznik Statystyczny Rzeczpospolitej Polskiej 2014 (2015). Warszawa: Główny Urząd Statystyczny.

[27] Santos, C. M., Ambrosio, V., Correira, A. & Peres, R. (2013). The importance of religious tourism segmentation for tourism destination management: the case of the island of St. Miguel, Azores. World Review of Enterpreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development 9(2), 166-178. DOI: 10.1504/WREMSD.2013.052357.

[28] Smith, M. K. (2006). Issues in Cultural Tourism Studies. New York: Routledge.

[29] Swatos, W. H. & Tomasi, L. (2002). From Medieval pilgrimage to religious tourism. Chicago: Chicago Praeger Publishers.

[30] Uysal, M., Sirgy, J. M., Woo, E. & Kim, H. (2015). Quality of life (QOL) and well-being research in tourism. Tourism Management 53, 244-261. DOI: 10.1016/j.tourman.2015.07.013.

European Countryside

The Journal of Mendel University in Brno

Journal Information


CiteScore 2018: 0.85

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.288
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.651

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 544 504 57
PDF Downloads 416 400 44