Social Infrastructure Services for Promoting Local Community Wellbeing in Lithuania

Open access


Social infrastructure is largely related to various services for community, facilities and public spaces, relationships and networks among local community members. It is therefore obvious that social infrastructure could be viewed as an important factor for creating better opportunities for integration and participation in society, fostering functional capabilities of a community, acknowledging human rights, improving judgements related to overall life satisfaction. The links between social infrastructure services and focus on local community wellbeing in Lithuanian’s social science discourse has not been substantiated sufficiently yet. Consequently, this article aims at disclosing the importance of social infrastructure services in promotion of local community wellbeing. The research question of this article is formulated as follows: how social infrastructure services contribute and could promote wellbeing of local community. The methodological background is based on both theoretical and empirical findings pertaining to the topic. The research results have suggested that the need of local community for social infrastructure services should be evaluated more carefully in the context of wellbeing. These services have been found to play significant role in reaching a certain level of wellbeing in view of the place where people live, how they feel and how to evaluate the future of their living.

[1] Antonyuka, V. S., Danilova, I. V., Mitelman, S. A. & Bulikeyeva, A. Zh. (2015). Regional Social Infrastructure Management in the System of Tools Used for Improving the Quality of Life for Regional Population. R-Economy 1(3), 395-407. DOI: 10.15826/recon.2015.3.003.

[2] Atkočiūnienė, V. (2000). Lietuvos kaimo socialinė infrastruktūra; ekonominis vertinimas ir plėtra: daktaro disertacija [PhD Thesis]. Akademija: Lietuvos žemės ūkio universitetas.

[3] Atkočiūnienė, V., Vaznonienė, G. & Pakeltienė, R. (2015). Aim of the Development of Rural Social Infrastructure: a Sustainable Community. Transformations in Business & Economics

14(2A), 509-528.

[4] Cattell, V., Dines, N., Gesler, W. & Curtis, S. (2008). Mingling, observing, and lingering: Everyday public spaces and their implications for well-being and social relations. Health & Place 14(3), 544-561. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2007.10.007.

[5] Cavaye, J. M. (2001). Rural Community Development: New Challenges and Enduring Dilemmas. The Journal of Regional Policy Analysis, 31(2), 109-124.

[6] Clarence, E. & Gabriel, M. (2014). People Helping People: the future of public services. London: Nesta.

[7] Engle, M. & Altschuld, J. W. (2014). Needs assessment: The perspective from the public sector. In Altschuld, J. W. & Watkins, R., eds., Needs assessment: Trends and a view toward the future. New Directions for Evaluation (pp. 33-45). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

[8] Haybron, D. M. (2011). Central Park: Nature, context, and human wellbeing. International Journal of Wellbeing, 1(2), 235-254. DOI: 10.5502/ijw.v1i2.6.

[9] Gopalakrishna, B. V. & Leelavathi, D. S. (2011). Infrastructure and Human development in India: An Interstate comparison. Journal of Global Economy, 7(4), 225-244.

[10] Kuliešis, G. & Vidickienė, D. (2008). Lietuvos kaimo gyventojų nuomonės tyrimai dėl kaimo infrastruktūros gerinimo. Akademija, 12(1), 92-100.

[11] Magee, L., Scerri, A. & James, P. (2012). Measuring Social Sustainability: A Community- Centred Approach. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 7(3), 239-261. DOI: 10.1007/s11482-012-9166-x.

[12] Martens, H. (2011). The role of public services in enhancing growth and well-being. In: Andor, L. et al., eds., Growth, well-being and social policy in Europe: trade-off or synergy? (pp. 27-33). Brussel: European Policy Center.

[13] McGregor, J. A. (2006). Researching Wellbeing: from Concepts to Methodology [WeD Working Paper 20]. University of Bath.

[14] McGregor, J. A., Camfield, L. & Woodcock, A. (2009). Needs, Wants and Goals: Wellbeing, Quality of Life and Public Policy. Applied Research Quality Life, 4(2), 135-154. DOI: 10.1007/s11482-009-9069-7.

[15] Mensah, C. A., Andres, L., Perera, U. & Roji, A. (2016). Enhancing quality of life through the lens of green spaces: A systematic review approach. International Journal of Wellbeing, 6(1), 142-163. DOI: 10.5502/ijw.v6i1.6.

[16] Pichardo-Muñiz, A. (2011). The Role of Diseconomies of Transportation and Public Safety Problems in the Measurement of Urban Quality of Life. Applied Research Quality Life, 6(4), 363-386. DOI: 10.1007/s11482-010-9134-2.

[17] Rothman, L. (2005). The Role of Community Infrastructure in Building Strong Neighbourhoods [Final Report]. Toronto: Family Service Association.

[18] Schuessler, K. F. & Fisher, G. A. (1985). Quality of Life Research and Sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 11, 129-149. DOI: 10.1146/

[19] Shannon, H., Rogers, S. H., John, M., Halstead, J. M., Gardner, K. H. & Carlson, C. H. (2011). Examining Walkability and Social Capital as Indicators of Quality of Life at the Municipal and Neighborhood Scales. Applied Research Quality Life. 6(2), 201-213. DOI: 10.1007/s11482-010-9132-4.

[20] Suharto, T., Tan, Y. & Severine, M. (2011). Social infrastructure planning and sustainable community: example from south east Queensland, Australia. In: Jahan, N., ed., Proceedings of the Business and Social Science Research Conference 2011 (pp. 1-12). Berwick: World Business Institute Australia.

[21] Swanson, L. (1992). Rural social infrastructure. In: Reid, J. N., ed., Foundations of Rural Development Policy, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

[22] Vaznonienė, G. (2015). The role of rural community enhancing rural social infrastructure changes. In: Treija, S. & Skujeniece, S., eds., Annual 21st International Scientific Conference: "Research for Rural Development" Volume 2, Jelgava, Latvia, 13-15 May 2015 (pp. 176-182). Jelgava: Latvian University of Agriculture.

[23] White, S. C. & Ellison, M. A. (2007). Wellbeing, livelihoods and resources in social practice. In Gough, A. & McGregor, J. A, eds., Wellbeing in Developing Countries: New Approaches and Research Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 157-175.

[24] Woodcraft, S., Bacon, N., Caistor-Arendar, L. & Hackett, T. (2012). Design for social sustainability. A framework for creating thriving new communities. London: Young Foundation.

[25] Yonk, R. M. & Reilly, S. (2012). Citizen Involvement & Quality of Life: Exit, Voice and Loyalty in a Time of Direct Democracy. Applied Research Quality Life, 7(1), 1-16. DOI: 10.1007/s11482-011-9142-x.

[26] Yu Chia-Pin, Cole, S. T. & Chancellor, Ch. (2016). Assessing Community Quality of Life in the Context of Tourism Development. Applied Research Quality Life, 11(1), 147-162. DOI: 10.1007/s11482-014-9359-6.

[27] Žalimienė, L. (1993). Lietuvos kaimo socialinės infrastruktūros pertvarkymo mechanizmas [PhD Thesis]. Vilinius: Institute of Philosophy, Sociology and Law of Lithuanian Academy of Sciences.

[28] Boldero, N. (2006). Strong Communities. Social Infrastructure Plan for Voluntary and Community Action in the Milton Keynes & South Midlands Growth Area. Voluntary and Community Action South Bedfordshire. Available from:

[29] Campbell, A. (2011). Commission on the Future Delivery of Public Services. Produced by APS Group Scotland DPPAS11647 (06/11), 102. Available from:

[30] Gasper, D. (2007). Human Well-being: Concepts and Conceptualizations. In McGillivray, M., ed., Human Well-Being. Studies in Development Economics and Policy (pp. 23-64). London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI: 10.1057/9780230625600_2.

[31] Law on the territorial administrative units and their boundaries. 2010. As last amended on 30 March 2010 - No XI-709. Vilnius: Republic of Lithuania.

[32] Measuring Well-being for Development. (2013). 2013 OECD Global Forum on Development. Discussion Paper for Session 3.1. Available from internet:

[33] Planning for social infrastructure and community services for urban growth areas. (2012). Implementation Guide. Available from internet:

[34] Role of social infrastructure in local and regional economic development. (2012). RDSA Regional Infrastructure Summit. Department of Planning Western Australia. Available from internet:

[35] Rural Development Programme (2014-2020). 2015. The Ministry of Agriculture of the Republic of Lithuania. Available from:

[36] Social cohesion and well-being in the EU. 2014. Bertelsmann Stiftung, Eurofound. Available from:

[37] Well-being in 2030. (2011). Aggregate report. Eurobarometer Qualitative studies. Available from:

[38] Well-being in 2030. (2011). Aggregate report. Eurobarometer Qualitative studies. Available from internet:

[39] Zizys, T., Kosny, M. & Bonnell, J. (2004). A Review of Social Planning Activities in the City of Toronto. Toronto: Social Development and Administration Division of Community Neighbourhood Services Department of the City of Toronto.

European Countryside

The Journal of Mendel University in Brno

Journal Information

CiteScore 2017: 0.78

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.265
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.607


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 58 58 44
PDF Downloads 52 52 42