What Students Tell Teachers about Practices that Integrate Subjects with English in a Lower Secondary School in Portugal

Open access

Abstract

CLIL (Content and Language Integrated Learning) is an approach thought to provide, mainly during Content (non-language, subject) classes, a meaningful environment at school for the use and learning of a foreign language (FL), and may also improve conditions and practices of the specific subject. Moreover, CLIL can represent a research context to gauge the importance of language-aware teaching as is the case with the Portuguese “English Plus” project (EP), in which History and Science are taught/ learnt with/in English at lower secondary school. Our doctoral research is designed as a descriptive-explanatory case study on the EP project and its participants (English and Science teachers, former and current students). More specifically, this work focuses on students and shows their relationship with the EP approach and (dis)advantages in learning a subject with a FL. Data were collected through a semi-structured questionnaire and interview, with subsequent content analysis. The importance of “integrated learning” and of diverse strategies used by the teacher to support/scaffold learning is present in students’ perspectives which may further influence teaching practices

Barbero, Teresina. “Insegnare in Lingua Straniera: Quali Sfide? Quali Difficoltà?” CLIL: Un Nuovo Ambiente Di Apprendimento. Sviluppi e Riflessioni Sull’uso Veicolare Di Una Lingua Seconda/ Straniera, edited by Carmel Mary Coonan, Libreria Editrice Cafoscarina, 2006, pp. 105-17.

Beacco, Jean-Claude, et al. Guide for the Development and Implementation of Curricula for Plurilingual and Intercultural Education. Council of Europe, 2010.

Blanchard, Brigitte, et al. “The PROFILES Project Promoting Science Teaching in a Foreign Language.” Science Education International, vol. 25, no. 2, 2014, pp. 78-96. www.icaseonline.net/sei/june2014/p4.pdf. Accessed 11 Feb. 2018.

Bunch, George C., et al. “Documenting the Language Demands of Mainstream Content-Area Assessment for English Learners: Participant Structures, Communicative Modes and Genre in Science Performance Assessments.” Language and Education, vol. 24, no. 3, 2010, pp. 185-214, doi: 10.1080/09500780903518986

Canet Pladevall, Roser, and Natalia Evnitskaya. “Rethink, Rewrite, Remake or Learning to Teach Science Through English.” AICLE – CLIL – EMILE. Educació Plurilingüe: Experiencias, Research & Polítiques, edited by Cristina Escobar Urmeneta et al., Servei de Publicacions de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 2011, pp. 167-77.

Clegg, John. “Analysing the Language Demands of Lessons Taught in a Second Language.” Revista española de lingüística aplicada, vol. 1, 2007, pp. 113-28, dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/ articulo?codigo=2575499. Accessed 11 Feb. 2018.

Council of Europe. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment (CEFR). COE, 2011, rm.coe.int/1680459f97. Accessed 11 Feb. 2018.

Coyle, Do. CLIL Planning Tools for Teachers. School of Education – University of Nottingham, 2005, www.unifg.it/sites/default/files/allegatiparagrafo/20-01-2014/coyle_clil_planningtool_kit.pdf. Accessed 11 Feb 2018.

Coyle, Do. “Listening to Learners: An Investigation into ‘Successful Learning’ across CLIL Contexts.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, vol. 16, no. 3, 2013, pp. 244-66, doi:10.1080/13670050.2013.777384.

Coyle, Do, Philip Hood, and David Marsh. CLIL Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge UP, 2010.

Cummins, Jim. “Bilingualism, Language Proficiency and Metalinguistic Development.” Childhood Bilingualism: Aspects of Linguistic, Cognitive and Social Development, edited by Peter Homel et al., Erlbaum, 1987, pp. 57-73.

Dalton-Puffer, Christiane, and Tarja Nikula. “Pragmatics of Content-Based Instruction: Teacher and Student Directives in Finnish and Austrian Classrooms.” Applied Linguistics, vol. 27, no. 2, 2006, pp. 241-67, doi:10.1093/applin/aml007.

Escobar Urmeneta, Cristina, and Natalia Evnitskaya. “Do You Know Actimel? The Adaptive Nature of Dialogic Teacher-Led Discussions in the CLIL Science Classroom: A Case Study.” The Language Learning Journal, vol. 42, no. 2, 2014, pp. 165-80, doi:10.1080/09571736.2014.889507.

European Commission. Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) at School in Europe. Eurydice Reports, 2006, publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/756ebdaa-f694-44e4-8409-21eef02c9b9b. Accessed 11 Feb. 2018.

European Commission. Civil Society Platform on Multilingualism. COM, 2011, elen.ngo/wp-content/uploads/ 2016/05/report-civil-society_en.pdf. Accessed 11 Feb. 2018.

European Commission. Key Data on Teaching Languages at School in Europe – 2017. Eurydice Reports, 2017, doi:10.2797/12061.

Grandinetti, Maria, et al. “How CLIL Can Provide a Pragmatic Means to Renovate Science Education – Even in a Sub-Optimally Bilingual Context.” International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, vol. 16, no. 3, 2013, pp. 354-74. doi:10.1080/13670050.2013.777390.

Lasagabaster, David, and Juan Manuel Sierra. “Immersion and CLIL in English: More Differences than Similarities.” ELT Journal, vol. 64, no. 4, 2010, pp. 367-75, doi:10.1093/elt/ccp082.

Lin, Angel M. Y. Language Across the Curriculum & CLIL in English as an Additional Language (EAL) Contexts. Theory and Practice. Springer, 2016.

Marsh, David. CLIL/EMILE – The European Dimension. Actions, Trends and Foresight Potential. Continuing Education Centre in Jyväskylä, 2002.

Marsh, David. Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) A Development Trajectory. Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Córdoba, 2012.

Marsh, David, and Gisella Langé, editors. Using Languages to Learn and Learning to Use Languages. University of Jyväskylä, 2000.

Marsh, David, et al. European Framework for CLIL Teacher Education. ECML, 2011, www.ecml.at/Portals/1/documents/ECML-resources/CLIL-EN.pdf?ver=2018-03-21-153925-563. Accessed 11 Feb. 2018.

Mehisto, Peeter. “Criteria for Producing CLIL Learning Material.” Encuentro, vol. 21, 2012, pp. 15-33, files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED539729.pdf. Accessed 11 Feb. 2018.

Milton, James, and Paul Meara. “Are the British Really Bad at Learning Foreign Languages?” Language Learning Journal, vol. 18, no. 1, 1998, pp. 68-76, doi:10.1080/09571739885200291.

Nikula, Tarja, et al. “CLIL Classroom Discourse: Research from Europe.” Journal of Immersion and Content-Based Language, vol. 1, no. 1, 2013, pp. 70-100, doi:10.1075/jicb.1.1.04nik.

Pavón Vázquez, Víctor, and Maria Ellison. “Examining Teacher Roles and Competences in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL).” Lingvarvm Arena, vol. 4, 2013, pp. 65-78, ler.letras.up.pt/uploads/ficheiros/12007.pdf. Accessed 11 Feb. 2018.

Pérez Cañado, María Luisa. “Are Teachers Ready for CLIL? Evidence from a European Study.” European Journal of Teacher Education, vol. 39, no. 2, 2016, pp. 202-21, doi:10.1080/02619768.2016.1138104.

Piacentini, Valentina, et al. “Abordagem Holística no Sistema Educativo Português para Desenvolver a(s) Literacia(s) das Ciências Integradas com o Inglês – Holistic Approach in the Portuguese Education System to Develop Literacies of Science Integrated with English.” Indagatio Didactica, vol. 8, no. 1, 2016, pp. 1975-992. revistas.ua.pt/ index.php/ID/article/view/3981/3663. Accessed 11 Feb. 2018.

Piacentini, Valentina, et al. “The Language Focus of Science Education Integrated with English Learning.” Enseñanza de las Ciencias, vol. Extra, 2017, pp. 399-404, ddd.uab.cat/record/184622. Accessed 11 Feb. 2018.

Roberts, Douglas A., and Rodger W. Bybee. “Scientific Literacy, Science Literacy, and Science Education.” Handbook of Research on Science Education Volume II, edited by Norman G. Lederman and Sandra K. Abell, Routledge, 2014, pp. 545-58.

Scott, Philip H., et al. “The Tension between Authoritative and Dialogic Discourse: A Fundamental Characteristic of Meaning Making Interactions in High School Science Lessons.” Science Education, vol. 90, no. 4, 2006, pp. 605-31, doi:10.1002/sce.20131.

Simões, Raquel A., et al. “The Project English Plus: A CLIL Approach in a Portuguese School.” Indagatio Didatica, vol. 5, no. 4, 2013, pp. 30-51, revistas.ua.pt/index.php/ID/ article/ viewFile/ 2565/2430. Accessed 11 Feb. 2018.

Tedick, Diane J., and Laurent Cammarata. “Content and Language Integration in K-12 Contexts: Student Outcomes, Teacher Practices, and Stakeholder Perspectives.” Foreign Language Annals, vol. 45, no. 51, 2012, pp. S28-S53, doi:10.111/j.1944-9720.2012.01178.x.

Ting, Yen-Ling Teresa. “CLIL Appeals to How the Brain Likes its Information: Examples from CLIL-(Neuro)Science.” International CLIL Research Journal, vol. 1, no. 3, 2010, pp. 3-18, www.icrj.eu/13/article1.html. Accessed 11 Feb. 2018.

Vieira, Rui M., et al. A Educação em Ciências com Orientação CTS. Atividades para o Ensino Básico. Areal Editores, 2011.

Wellington, Jerry, and Jonathan Osborne. Language and Literacy in Science Education. Open UP, 2001.

Wolff, Dieter. “The European Framework for CLIL Teacher Education.” Synergies Italie, vol. 8, 2012, pp. 105-16, gerflint.fr/Base/Italie8/dieter_wolff.pdf. Accessed 11 Feb. 2018.

e-TEALS

an e-journal of Teacher Education and Applied Language Studies

Journal Information

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 34 34 8
PDF Downloads 26 26 8