Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL), an educational approach in which an additional language is used to teach school subjects, has become increasingly widespread within state schools across Europe since the acronym was coined in the mid-nineties. This now includes Portugal where CLIL activity across educational levels has been growing in recent years. Like other national contexts in Europe, this has also been through the grassroots initiatives of individual schools keen to influence positive change in educational practices and reap the benefits which CLIL is purported to bring about. One such case is the GoCLIL project at Escola Secundária Dr. Joaquim Gomes Ferreira Alves in Valadares, Vila Nova de Gaia, which has been operating a CLIL programme through English since the academic year 2013-2014. This article outlines fundamentals of implementing CLIL in schools and provides an overview of the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats (SWOT) of the case. It uses data collected from questionnaires administered to teachers, pupils and parents, lesson observations, pupil focus groups, and teacher reflections obtained during the ongoing monitoring process led by the Faculty of Arts and Humanities of the University of Porto. The data contribute to the rich description of the project from which it has been possible to identify and compare findings across years, as well as factors which have contributed to its sustainability. Insights gained from this case study will be interesting and potentially useful for schools which are considering setting up a project of this kind.
Baetens Beardsmore, Hugo. “The significance of CLIL/EMILE.” CLIL/EMILE The European Dimension : Action, Trends and Foresight Potential, edited by David Marsh, European Commission, 2002, pp. 24-26.
Bonnet, Andreas. “Towards an Evidence Base for CLIL: How to Integrate Qualitative and Quantitative as well as Process, Product and Participant Perspectives in CLIL Research.” International CLIL Research Journal, vol. 1, no. 4, 2012, pp. 66-78, www.icrj.eu/14/article7.html. Accessed 27 Jan 2017.
Bruton, Anthony. “Is CLIL so Beneficial, or Just Selective? Re-Evaluating Some of the Research.” System, vol. 39, no. 4, 2011, pp. 523-32.
Cenoz, Jasone, et al. “Critical Analysis of CLIL: Taking Stock and Looking Forward.” Applied Linguistics, vol. 35, no. 3, 2013, pp. 243-62.
Costa, Manuela, and Manuela Lopes. “Boas Práticas na Aprendizagem Integrada de Conteúdos e de Língua: Uma Experiência.” Educação Bilingue e Bilinguismo, organised by ILTEC, Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian, 20-21 Junho, 2011.
Council of Europe. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment, 2001, www.coe.int/lang-CEFR. Accessed 14 December 2017.
Coyle, Do, et al. CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge UP, 2010.
Coyle, Do, et al. Towards an Integrated Curriculum – CLIL National Statement and Guidelines. The Languages Company, 2009.
Dalton-Puffer, Christiane, et al. “You Can Stand under My Umbrella: Immersion, CLIL and Billingual Education: A Response to Cenoz, Genesse and Gorter (2013).” Applied Linguistics, vol. 35, no. 2, 2014, pp. 212-18.
Dobson, Alan, et al. Bilingual Education Project Spain: Evaluation Report. Ministério de Educación de España and British Council, 2010.
Duff, Patricia, and Tim Anderson. “Case-Study Research.” The Cambridge Guide to Research in Language Teaching and Learning, edited by James Dean Brown and Christine Coombe, Cambridge UP, 2015, pp.112-18.
Duff, Patricia. “How to Carry out Case Study.” Research Methods in Second Language Acquisition. A Practical Guide, edited by Alison Mackey and Susan. M. Gass, Wiley-Blackwell, 2012, pp. 95-116.
Ellison, Maria. CLIL as a Catalyst for Developing Reflective Practice in Foreign Language Teacher Education. (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Faculty of Arts and Humanities, University of Porto, 2014.
Ellison, Maria. “CLIL: The Added Value to Foreign Language Teacher Education for Young Learners.” Linguarum Arena, vol. 6, 2015, pp. 59-69.
Ellison, Maria. “(De)Constructing CLIL in the Primary Context: Primary Practice Revisited and Reconsidered.” APPINEP Bulletin, vol. 22, 2010, pp. 8-11.
Friedman, Debra. “How to Collect and Analyze Qualitative Data.” Research Methods in Second Language Acquisition. A Practical Guide, edited by Alison Mackey and Susan. M. Gass, Wiley-Blackwell, 2012, pp.180-200.
Key Data on Teaching Languages at School in Europe 2012. Eurydice, 2012.
Key Data on Teaching Languages at School in Europe 2017. Eurydice, 2017.
Ludbrook, Geraldine. “CLIL: The Potential of Multilingual Education.” Dos Algarves, vol. 3, no. 17, 2008, pp. 18-27.
Marsh, David. CLIL/EMILE the European Dimension : Action, Trends and Foresight Potential. European Commission, 2002.
Marsh, David, et al. The European Framework for CLIL Teacher Education. European Centre for Modern Languages (ECML), 2010.
Massler, Ute, et al. “Effective CLIL Teaching Techniques.” Guidelines for CLIL Implementation in Primary and Pre-Primary Education, edited by Sophie Ioannou-Georgiou and Pavlos Pavlou, European Commission, 2011, pp. 66-97.
Mehisto, Peeter. “CLIL Counterweights: Recognizing and Decreasing Disjuncture in CLIL.” International CLIL Research Journal, vol. 1, no. 1, 2008, pp. 93-119, www.icrj.eu/11/article8.html. Accessed 18 December 2017.
Mehisto, Peeter. “Criteria for Producing CLIL Learning Material.” Encuentro, vol. 21, 2012, pp. 15-33.
Mehisto, Peeter, et al. Uncovering CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning in Bilingual and Multilingual Education. Macmillan, 2008.
Navés, Teresa. “Effective Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) Programmes.” Content and Language Integrated Learning: Evidence from Research in Europe, edited by Yolanda Ruiz de Zarobe, Multilingual Matters, 2009, pp. 22-41.
Pavón, Victor, and Maria Ellison. “Examining Teacher Roles and Competences in Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL).” Linguarum Arena, vol. 4, 2013, pp. 65-78.
Pavón, Victor, and Fernando Rubio. “Teachers’ Concerns and Uncertainties about the Introduction of CLIL Programmes.” Porta Linguarum, vol. 14, 2010, pp. 45-58.
Pérez Cañado, Maria Luisa. “From CLIL Craze to the CLIL Conundrum: Addressing the Current CLIL Controversy.” Bellaterra Journal of Teaching and Learning Language and Literature, vol. 9, no. 1, 2016, pp. 9-31.
Piacentini, Valentina, et al. “Abordagem Holística no Sistema Educativo Português para Desenvolver a(s) Literacia(s) das Ciências Integradas com o Inglês.” Desenvolvimento Curricular e Didática – Indagatio Didactica, vol. 8, no. 1, 2016, pp. 1975-92.
Simões, Ana Raquel, et al. “The Project English Plus: a CLIL Approach in a Portuguese School.” Desenvolvimento Curricular e Didática – Indagatio Didactica, vol. 5, no. 4, 2013, pp. 30-51.
Soler, David, et al. “What Makes CLIL Leadership Effective? A Case Study.” English Language Teaching Journal, vol. 71, no. 4, 2017, pp. 478-90.
Sudhoff, Julian. “CLIL and Intercultural Communicative Competence: Foundations and Approaches towards a Fusion.” International CLIL Research Journal, vol. 1, no. 3, 2010, pp. 30-37, www.icrj.eu/13/article3.html. Accessed 22 January 2018.
Yin, Robert. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Sage, 1994.