Top-Down and Bottom-Up Urban and Regional Planning: Towards a Framework for The Use of Planning Standards

Open access

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to discuss the ways that the top-down and the bottom-up approaches to planning can be combined in the practice of planning standards. In the first part, the paper examines the utilization of planning standards through time, while in the second part it aims to unravel the relationship between the use of planning standards and the top-down as well as the bottom-up planning approach. In the third part, the paper focuses on the limitations of bottom-up approaches, in order to demonstrate that they can only be used in a certain planning scale, leaving all other scales to top-down approaches. Last but not least, the paper proposes a framework for the use of planning standards in a combined top-down and bottom-up planning approach.

ALEXANDER, E. R. (1997), ‘A Mile or a Millimetre? Measuring the “Planning Theory - Practice Gap”’, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 24 (1), pp. 3-6.

ALEXANDER, E. R. (1999), ‘Response to Commentaries: Planning Theory and Practice - Mixing Them or Minding the Gap’, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 26 (1), pp. 1-4.

ALEXANDER, E. R. (2010), ‘Introduction: Does Planning Theory Affect Practice, and If So, How?’, Planning Theory, 9 (2), pp. 99-107.

ALLMENDINGER, P. (2002), Planning Theory, New York: Palgrave.

ALLMENDINGER, P. and TEWDWR-JONES, M. (1997), ‘Mind the Gap: Planning Theory-Practice and the Translation of Knowledge into Action - A Comment on Alexander’, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 24 (4), pp. 802-806.

ARAVANTINOS, A. I. (1997), Urban Planning: For a Sustainable Development of Urban Space (in Greek), Athens: Symmetria.

CHADWICK, G. (1971, 1978), A Systems View of Planning. Towards a Theory of the Urban and Regional Planning Process, Oxford: Pergamon Press.

CITY OF SACRAMENTO (1988), General Plan: Public Facilities and Services Element, Sacramento.

CITY OF SACRAMENTO (2005), General Plan Update: Technical Background Report - Public Services, Sacramento.

CITY OF SACRAMENTO (2008a), Sacramento 2030 General Plan: Public Review Draft - Land Use and Urban Design, Sacramento.

CITY OF SACRAMENTO (2008b), Sacramento 2030 General Plan: Public Review Draft - Education, Recreation and Culture, Sacramento.

DAVIDOFF, P. (1996), ‘Advocacy and Pluralism in Planning’, [in:] CAMPBELL, S. and FAINSTEIN, S. (eds.), Readings in Planning Theory, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishers (originally published in 1965 in Journal of American Institute of Planners, 31 (4), pp. 331-338).

ERNICKE AND PARTNER (2002), Erläuterungsbericht. Flächennutzungsplan der Stadt Treuenbrietzen, Treuenbrietzen.

FALUDI, A. (1973), Planning Theory, Oxford: Pergamon Press.

FALUDI, A. (1986), Critical Rationalism and Planning Methodology, London: Pion.

FEDER, G. (1939), Die neue Stadt: Versuch der Begründung einer Neuen Stadtplanungskunst aus der Sozialen Struktur der Bevölkerung, Berlin: Springer.

GGG (2004), ‘Ministerial Degree: Approval of Urban Planning Standards and Maximum Population Densities Used in the Preparation of General Urban Plans, Spatial Organization of Open Cities Plans and Urban Plans’ (in Greek), National Printing Office, D (285), March 5.

HARRIS, N. (1997), ‘Orienting Oneself to Practice: A Comment on Alexander’, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 24 (4), pp. 799-801.

HEALEY, P. (1996), ‘Planning Through Debate: The Communicative Turn in Planning Theory’, [in:] CAMPELL, S. and FAINSTEIN, S. (eds.), Readings in Planning Theory, Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishers (originally published in 1992 in Town Planning Review, 63 (2), pp. 143-162).

HEALEY, P. (1997), Collaborative Planning. Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies, Vancouver: UBC Press.

HEALEY, P., MCDOUGALL, G. and THOMAS, M. (1982), ‘Theoretical Debates in Planning Towards a Coherent Dialogue’, [in:] HEALEY, P., MCDOUGALL, G. and THOMAS, M. (eds.), Planning Theory. Prospects for the 1980s, Oxford: Pergamon Press.

HKPD (2010), Hong Kong Planning Standards and Guidelines, Hong Kong: Hong Kong Planning Department.

LAGOPOULOS, A.-Ph. (2009), ‘Urban Planning, Poleology and Land Uses’, [in:] Constantinos Doxiadis and his Work (in Greek), Athens: Technical Chamber of Greece.

LAURIA, M. (2010), ‘Does Planning Theory Affect Practice, and If So, How?’, Planning Theory, 9 (2), pp. 156-159.

MARCH, A. (2010), ‘Practising Theory: When Theory Affects Urban Planning’, Planning Theory, 9 (2), pp. 108-125.

MCLOUGHLIN, J. B. (1969), Urban and Regional Planning. A Systems Approach, London: Faber.

MORONI, S. (2010), ‘Rethinking the Theory and Practice of Land Use Regulation: Towards Monocracy’, Planning Theory, 9 (2), pp. 137-155.

MURRAY, M., GREER, J., HOUSTON, D., MCKAY, S. and MURTAGH, B. (2009), ‘Bridging Top down and Bottom up: Modelling Community Preferences for a Dispersed Rural Settlement Pattern’, European Planning Studies, 17 (3), pp. 441-462.

NÆSS, P. (2001), ‘Urban Planning and Sustainable Development’, European Planning Studies, 9 (4), pp. 503-524.

NEUMAN, P. and THORNLEY, A. (1996), Urban Planning in Europe. International Competition, National Systems and Planning Projects, London: Routledge.

OGRI (1968), ‘Decreto Ministeriale: Limiti inderogabili di densità edilizia, di altezza, di distanza fra i fabbricati e rapporti massimi tra gli spazi destinati agli insediamenti residenziali e produttivi e spazi pubblici o riservati alle attività collettive, al verde pubblico o a parcheggi, da osservare ai fini della formazione dei nuovi strumenti urbanistici o della revisione di quelli esistenti, ai sensi dell’art. 17 della legge n. 765 del 1967’, Official Gazette of the Republic of Italy, 1444, April 2.

ÖTISHEIM and VVM (2006), Begründung. Flächennutzungsplan 2020, Mühlacker.

PISSOURIOS, I. A. (2013a), ‘An Interdisciplinary Study on Indicators: A Comparative Review of Quality-of-Life, Macroeconomic, Environmental, Welfare and Sustainability Indicators’, Ecological Indicators, 34, pp. 420-427.

PISSOURIOS, I. A. (2013b), ‘Whither the Planning Theory-Practice Gap? A Case Study on the Relationship between Urban Indicators and Planning Theories’, Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, 8 (2), pp. 80-92.

SABATIER, P. (1986), ‘Top-down and Bottom-up Approaches to Implementation Research: A Critical Analysis and Suggested Synthesis’, Journal of Public Policy, 6 (1), pp. 21-48.

SFPD (1990), San Francisco General Plan: Community Facilities Element, San Francisco.

SFPD (1997a), San Francisco General Plan, San Francisco.

SFPD (1997b), San Francisco General Plan: Downtown Area Plan, San Francisco.

SFPD (1997c), San Francisco General Plan: Community Safety, San Francisco.

SFPD (2004), San Francisco General Plan: Housing Element, San Francisco.

SFPD (2007), San Francisco General Plan: Recreation and Open Space, San Francisco.

SPFS (2009), Flächennutzungsplan Begründung, Plauen.

TAYLOR, N. (1998), Urban Planning Theory since 1945, London: Sage.

USSR (1962), Regulations and Standards for the Planning and Development of Towns, Boston: National Lending Library for Science and Technology (originally published in Russian in 1958).

WATSON, V. (2008), ‘Down to Earth: Linking Planning Theory and Practice in the “Metropole” and Beyond’, International Planning Studies, 13 (3), pp. 223-237.

European Spatial Research and Policy

The Journal of University of Lodz

Journal Information


CiteScore 2017: 0.44

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.169
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.285

Cited By

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 679 679 98
PDF Downloads 400 400 77