Correlates of rural development: A case study of Sadar development block of Pratapgarh District in Uttar Pradesh, India

Open access


Rural development aims at improving the quality of life of rural people, and in the process infrastructure variables play a crucial role. India is the second most populous country in the world and the majority of its population lives in rural areas. Rural development has been India’s prime concern ever since the time of independence, and several strategies and plans were implemented from time to time to achieve a better level of development. However, neither top-down, nor bottom-up strategies of development could bring the desired changes. This article attempts to identify some correlates of rural development and tries to understand why the desired level and pattern of development could not be achieved even after seven decades of the planning process. The study analyses the case of ‘Sadar’ development block of Pratapgarh district in Uttar Pradesh. The analysis of 10 selected variables reveals that there is a vast disparity in the level of development in the study area. However, the study shows that lack of basic education, health and credit facilities is the cause of this disparity and poor level of development. In view of the findings the author suggests that a ‘local resource-oriented development strategy’ should be adopted to ensure the holistic development of the rural areas.

If the inline PDF is not rendering correctly, you can download the PDF file here.

  • Allmendinger P. Haughton G. 2012. Post-political Spatial Planning in England: A Crisis of Consensus? Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 37: 89–103.

  • Banerjee S. 1992. Disparities in Development of Socio-Economic Infrastructure in Rural Areas of Selected Districts of Uttar Pradesh. Geographical Review of India 54 1: 31–36.

  • Berry B.J.L. 1964. Approaches to Regional Analysis-A Synthesis. Annals of Association of American Geographers 54 1: 2–11.

  • Bhat L.S. et. al. (eds) 1982. Regional Inequalities in India: An Inter-State and Intra-State Analysis. Society for the Study of Regional Disparities New Delhi.

  • Dholakia R.H. 2003. Regional Disparity in Economic and Human Development in India. Economic and Political Weekly 38 39: 4166–4172.

  • Diwakar D.M. 2009. Intra-Regional Disparities Inequality and Poverty in Uttar Pradesh. Economic and Political Weekly 44: 264–273.

  • Goodwin M. 1998. The Governance of Rural Areas: Some Emerging Research Issues and Agendas. Journal of Rural Studies 14 1: 5–12.

  • Gulati S.C. 2012. District Level Development Indices: A Factor Analytical Approach. [in:] A. Shukla (ed.) Measurement of Regional Disparities. Deep & Deep Publications New Delhi: 255–273.

  • Harris N. Hooper A. 2004. Rediscovering the ‘Spatial’ In Public Policy and Planning: An Examination of The Spatial Content of Sectoral Policy Documents. Planning Theory & Practice 5 2: 147–169.

  • Healey P. 2004. The Treatment of Space and Place in the New Strategic Spatial Planning of Europe. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 28 1: 45–67.

  • Krishnan G. 1984. Regional Disparities in India. [in:] K.J. Rice (ed.) Geographical Perspective on Development in India. Department of Social Science Education The University of Georgia: 15–37.

  • Kumar A. (ed.) 1990. Planning Development and Disparities in Rural India. Commonwealth Publishers New Delhi.

  • Kundu A. Raza M. 1982. Indian Economy: The Regional Dimension. Centre for the Study of Regional Development JNU New Delhi.

  • Misra R.P. Prakasa Rao V.L.S. 1974. Regional Development Planning in India: A New Strategy. Vikas Publishing House Delhi.

  • Mitra A. 1967. Levels of Regional Development in India. Indian Statistical Institute New Delhi.

  • Naseer Y. 2004. Levels of Development: A Case Study of Western Plain of Uttar Pradesh. Geographical Review of India 65.

  • Nath V. 1979. Regional Development Policies. Economic and Political Weekly 6.

  • Ramchandra R. Raghu G.V. 1987. Regional Disparities in Chittoor District Andhra Pradesh. The Indian Geographical Journal 62 2: 79–90.

  • Ray C. 1999. Endogenous Development in Era of Reflexive Modernity. Journal of Rural Studies 15 3: 257–267.

  • Roberts D. 2003. The Economic Base of Rural Areas: A SAM-based Analysis of the Western Isles. Environment and Planning A 35 1: 95–111.

  • Shortall S. Shucksmith M. 1998. Integrated Rural Development: Issues Arising from the Scottish Experience. European Planning Studies 6 1: 73–88.

  • Shucksmith M. 2000. Endogenous Development Social Capital and Social Inclusion: Perspectives from LEADER in the UK. Sociologia Ruralis 40 2: 208–218.

  • Smith D.M. 1979. Where the Grass is Greener-Living in an Unequal World. The John Hopkins University Press Baltimore.

  • Sundaram K.V. 1983. Geography of Underdevelopment. Concept Publishing House New Delhi.

  • Terluin I. 2003. Differences in Economic Development in Rural Regions of Advanced Countries: An Overview and Critical Analysis of Theories. Journal of Rural Studies 19: 327–344.

Journal information
All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 235 203 4
PDF Downloads 173 135 4