The Analysis of Firms’ Involvement in Internationalisation And Determinants of its Intensity – An Analysis For Developing and Post-Transition Economies

Open access


The study presents the empirical analysis of firms’ involvement in different forms of internationalisation: export, indirect export, import, indirect import and finally simultaneous exporting and importing. The analysis is based on firm-level data from the World Bank Enterprise Survey (March 2017 release). The empirical part is divided into two stages. Firstly account is taken of firms’ heterogeneity and then a Melitz type analysis of the firms’ likeliness of being involved in international activity is performed. Secondly the sample of firms is limited to only those involved in the internationalisation process and then a regression is carried out with the export/import intensity being the dependent variable. The results indicate that determinants of the foreign markets are different from those connected with trade intensity with the exception of the foreign ownership which is the only one associated in the same way with involvement in internationalisation and with its intensity.


  • Chaney, T. (2008). Distorted gravity: the intensive and extensive margins of international trade. The American Economic Review, 98(4), 1707-1721.

  • Cieślik, A., Michałek, A., & Michałek, J. J. (2014). European integration and firm’s export performance in the new EU member countries. The Poznań University of Economics Review, 14(4), 38-53.

  • Eaton, J., Kortum, S., & Kramarz, F. (2004). Dissecting trade: firms, industries and export destinations. American Economic Review, 94, 150-154.

  • Heckman, J. J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47, 153-161.

  • Hagemejer J. (2015). Productivity spillovers in the GVC. The case of Poland and the New EU Member States (WNE Working Paper No. 42(2015)/190). University of Warsaw, Faculty of Economic Sciences.

  • Helpman, E., Melitz, M., & Rubinstein, Y. (2008). Estimating trade flows: trading partners and trading volumes. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123(2), 441-487.

  • Helpman E., Melitz M. J., Yeaple S. R., (2004). Exports versus FDI with heterogenous firms. American Economic Review, 94, 300-316.

  • Hummels, D., & Klenow, P. J. (2005). The variety and quality of a nation’s exports. The American Economic Review, 95(3), 704-723.

  • Katayama, H., Lu, S., & Tybout, J. R. (2009). Firm-level productivity studies: illusions and a solution. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 27(3), 403-413.

  • Kordalska, A., Wolszczak-Derlacz, J., & Parteka, A. (2016). Global value chains and productivity gains: a cross-country analysis. Collegium of Economic Analysis Annals, 41, 11-28.

  • Krugman, P. (1979). Increasing returns, monopolistic competition, and international trade. Journal of International Economics, 9(4), 469-479.

  • Krugman, P. (1980). Scale economies, product differentiation, and the pattern of trade. American Economic Review, 70(5), 950-959.

  • Levinsohn, J., & Petrin, A. (2003). Estimating production functions using inputs to control for unobservables. Review of Economic Studies, 70(2), 317-341.

  • Martins, P. S., & Yang, Y. (2009). The impact of exporting on firm productivity: a meta- analysis of the learning-by-exporting hypothesis. Review of World Economics, 145(3), 431-445.

  • Melitz, M. (2003). The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica, 71, 1695-1725.

  • Melitz, M. J., & Redding, S. J. (2014). Heterogeneous firms and trade. Handbook of International Economics, 4, 1-54.

  • Michel, B., Rycx, F. (2014). Productivity gains and spillovers from offshoring. Review of International Economics, 22(1), 73-85.

  • OECD. (2001). Measuring productivity: measurement of aggregate and industry-level productivity growth, OECD Manual, Paris: OECD.

  • OECD, and World Bank Group Bank (2015). Inclusive Global Value Chains. Policy options in trade and complementary areas for GVC Integration by small and medium

  • enterprises and low-income developing countries. Retrieved from

  • OECD. (2017). OECD Compendium of Productivity Indicators 2017. OECD Publishing Paris.

  • Ohlin, B. (1933). International and interregional trade. Cambridge: Harvard Economic Studies.

  • Ranjan, P., & Raychaudhuri, J. (2016). The “new-new” trade theory: a review of the literature. In International Trade and International Finance (3-21). Springer India.

  • Ricardo, D. (1821). On the principles of political economy, and taxation. London: John Murray.

  • Schank, T., Schnabel, C., & Wagner, J. (2010). Higher wages in exporting firms: self‑selection, export effect, or both? First evidence from linked employer-employee data. Review of World Economics, 146(2), 303-322.

  • Schworer, T. (2013). Offshoring, domestic outsourcing and productivity: evidence for a number of European countries. Review of World Economics, 149, 131-149.

  • Silva, J. S., Tenreyro, S., & Wei, K. (2014). Estimating the extensive margin of trade. Journal of International Economics, 93(1), 67-75.

  • Singh, T. (2010). Does international trade cause economic growth? A survey. The World Economy, 33(11), 1517-1564.

  • Smith, A. (1776). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations, Vol. 1. London: W. Strahan and T. Cadell.

  • Vogel, A., & Wagner, J. (2010). Higher productivity in importing German manufacturing firms: self-selection, learning from importing, or both?. Review of World Economics, 145(4), 641-665.

  • Wagner, J. (2007). Exports and productivity: a survey of the evidence from firm-level data. The World Economy, 30(1), 60-82.

  • Wagner, J. (2012). International trade, firm performance: a survey of empirical studies since 2006. Review of World Economics/Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 148(2), 235-267.

  • World Bank, (2009). Enterprise Survey and indicator surveys. Sampling methodology:

  • World Bank, (2011). World Bank’s Enterprise Survey understanding the questionnaire.

  • Retrieved from

Journal Information


All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 14 14 14
PDF Downloads 2 2 2