Articulation and Liars

Open access

Abstract

Jamie Tappenden was one of the first authors to entertain the possibility of a common treatment for the Liar and the Sorites paradoxes. In order to deal with these two paradoxes he proposed using the Strong Kleene semantic scheme. This strategy left unexplained our tendency to regard as true certain sentences which, according to this semantic scheme, should lack truth value. Tappenden tried to solve this problem by using a new speech act, articulation. Unlike assertion, which implies truth, articulation only implies non-falsity. In this paper I argue that Tappenden’s strategy cannot be successfully applied to truth and the Liar.

References

  • Eklund, Matti. 2001. Supervaluationism, vagueifiers, and semantic overdetermination. Dialectica 55: 363-378.

  • Field, Hartry. 2003. The semantic paradoxes and the paradoxes of vagueness. In Liars and Heaps, New Essays on Paradox. Edited by J.C. Beall. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Field, Hartry. 2008. Saving Truth from Paradox. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Fine, Kit. 1975. Vagueness, truth and logic. Synthese 30: 265-300.

  • Graff Fara, Delia. 2000. Shifting sands. Philosophical Topics 28: 45-81.

  • Gupta, Anil and Nuel Belnap. 1993. The Revision Theory of Truth. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

  • Hyde, Dominic. 2013. Are the sorites and liar paradox of a kind? In Paraconsistency: Logic and Applications. Edited by Francesco Berto et al. Logic, Epistemology and the Unity of Science 26: 349-366.

  • Keefe, Rosanna. 2000. Theories of Vagueness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Kremer, Michael. 1988. Kripke and the logic of truth. Journal of Philosophical Logic 17: 225-278.

  • Kripke, Saul A. 1975. Outline of a theory of truth. Journal of Philosophy 72: 690-716.

  • McGee, Vann 1991. Truth, Vagueness, and Paradox. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.

  • Oms, Sergi. 2010. Truth-functional and penumbral intuitions. Theoria 25: 137-147.

  • Priest, Graham. 1994. The structure of the paradoxes of self-reference. Mind 103: 25-34.

  • Priest, Graham. 2002. Beyond the Limits of Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Priest, Graham. 2010. Inclosures, vagueness, and self-reference. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 51: 69-84.

  • Soames, Scott. 1999. Understanding Truth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Tappenden, Jamie. 1993. The liar and sorites paradoxes: toward a unified treatment. Journal of Philosophy 60: 551-577.

  • Tarski, Alfred. 1983. The concept of truth in formalized languages.In Logic, Semantics, Metamathematics. Edited by John Corcoran. Translated by J. H. Woodger. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.

  • Visser, Albert. 1989. Semantics and the liar paradox. In Handbook of Philosophical Logic 4:617-706.

Disputatio

International Journal of Philosophy

Journal Information

Metrics

All Time Past Year Past 30 Days
Abstract Views 0 0 0
Full Text Views 14 14 14
PDF Downloads 5 5 5